Stem cell transplantation in traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating condition that causes substantial morbidity and mortality and for which no treatments are available. Stem cells offer some promise in the restoration of neurological function. We used systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression to study the impact...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ana Antonic, Emily S Sena, Jennifer S Lees, Taryn E Wills, Peta Skeers, Peter E Batchelor, Malcolm R Macleod, David W Howells
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/45f5956858734163946af93f4ac91320
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:45f5956858734163946af93f4ac91320
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:45f5956858734163946af93f4ac913202021-11-18T05:37:41ZStem cell transplantation in traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies.1544-91731545-788510.1371/journal.pbio.1001738https://doaj.org/article/45f5956858734163946af93f4ac913202013-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24358022/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1544-9173https://doaj.org/toc/1545-7885Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating condition that causes substantial morbidity and mortality and for which no treatments are available. Stem cells offer some promise in the restoration of neurological function. We used systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression to study the impact of stem cell biology and experimental design on motor and sensory outcomes following stem cell treatments in animal models of SCI. One hundred and fifty-six publications using 45 different stem cell preparations met our prespecified inclusion criteria. Only one publication used autologous stem cells. Overall, allogeneic stem cell treatment appears to improve both motor (effect size, 27.2%; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 25.0%-29.4%; 312 comparisons in 5,628 animals) and sensory (effect size, 26.3%; 95% CI, 7.9%-44.7%; 23 comparisons in 473 animals) outcome. For sensory outcome, most heterogeneity between experiments was accounted for by facets of stem cell biology. Differentiation before implantation and intravenous route of delivery favoured better outcome. Stem cell implantation did not appear to improve sensory outcome in female animals and appeared to be enhanced by isoflurane anaesthesia. Biological plausibility was supported by the presence of a dose-response relationship. For motor outcome, facets of stem cell biology had little detectable effect. Instead most heterogeneity could be explained by the experimental modelling and the outcome measure used. The location of injury, method of injury induction, and presence of immunosuppression all had an impact. Reporting of measures to reduce bias was higher than has been seen in other neuroscience domains but were still suboptimal. Motor outcomes studies that did not report the blinded assessment of outcome gave inflated estimates of efficacy. Extensive recent preclinical literature suggests that stem-cell-based therapies may offer promise, however the impact of compromised internal validity and publication bias mean that efficacy is likely to be somewhat lower than reported here.Ana AntonicEmily S SenaJennifer S LeesTaryn E WillsPeta SkeersPeter E BatchelorMalcolm R MacleodDavid W HowellsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleBiology (General)QH301-705.5ENPLoS Biology, Vol 11, Iss 12, p e1001738 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
spellingShingle Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ana Antonic
Emily S Sena
Jennifer S Lees
Taryn E Wills
Peta Skeers
Peter E Batchelor
Malcolm R Macleod
David W Howells
Stem cell transplantation in traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies.
description Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating condition that causes substantial morbidity and mortality and for which no treatments are available. Stem cells offer some promise in the restoration of neurological function. We used systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression to study the impact of stem cell biology and experimental design on motor and sensory outcomes following stem cell treatments in animal models of SCI. One hundred and fifty-six publications using 45 different stem cell preparations met our prespecified inclusion criteria. Only one publication used autologous stem cells. Overall, allogeneic stem cell treatment appears to improve both motor (effect size, 27.2%; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 25.0%-29.4%; 312 comparisons in 5,628 animals) and sensory (effect size, 26.3%; 95% CI, 7.9%-44.7%; 23 comparisons in 473 animals) outcome. For sensory outcome, most heterogeneity between experiments was accounted for by facets of stem cell biology. Differentiation before implantation and intravenous route of delivery favoured better outcome. Stem cell implantation did not appear to improve sensory outcome in female animals and appeared to be enhanced by isoflurane anaesthesia. Biological plausibility was supported by the presence of a dose-response relationship. For motor outcome, facets of stem cell biology had little detectable effect. Instead most heterogeneity could be explained by the experimental modelling and the outcome measure used. The location of injury, method of injury induction, and presence of immunosuppression all had an impact. Reporting of measures to reduce bias was higher than has been seen in other neuroscience domains but were still suboptimal. Motor outcomes studies that did not report the blinded assessment of outcome gave inflated estimates of efficacy. Extensive recent preclinical literature suggests that stem-cell-based therapies may offer promise, however the impact of compromised internal validity and publication bias mean that efficacy is likely to be somewhat lower than reported here.
format article
author Ana Antonic
Emily S Sena
Jennifer S Lees
Taryn E Wills
Peta Skeers
Peter E Batchelor
Malcolm R Macleod
David W Howells
author_facet Ana Antonic
Emily S Sena
Jennifer S Lees
Taryn E Wills
Peta Skeers
Peter E Batchelor
Malcolm R Macleod
David W Howells
author_sort Ana Antonic
title Stem cell transplantation in traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies.
title_short Stem cell transplantation in traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies.
title_full Stem cell transplantation in traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies.
title_fullStr Stem cell transplantation in traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies.
title_full_unstemmed Stem cell transplantation in traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies.
title_sort stem cell transplantation in traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of animal studies.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/45f5956858734163946af93f4ac91320
work_keys_str_mv AT anaantonic stemcelltransplantationintraumaticspinalcordinjuryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofanimalstudies
AT emilyssena stemcelltransplantationintraumaticspinalcordinjuryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofanimalstudies
AT jenniferslees stemcelltransplantationintraumaticspinalcordinjuryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofanimalstudies
AT tarynewills stemcelltransplantationintraumaticspinalcordinjuryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofanimalstudies
AT petaskeers stemcelltransplantationintraumaticspinalcordinjuryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofanimalstudies
AT peterebatchelor stemcelltransplantationintraumaticspinalcordinjuryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofanimalstudies
AT malcolmrmacleod stemcelltransplantationintraumaticspinalcordinjuryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofanimalstudies
AT davidwhowells stemcelltransplantationintraumaticspinalcordinjuryasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofanimalstudies
_version_ 1718424845963755520