Cloning from the Perspective of Theology and Jurisprudence

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cloning is one of the achievements in the field of experimental science in contemporary time, which is associated with many questions, serious challenges and sensitivity for experts, jurists, and ethics scholars that each of them has adopted different positions against it....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	A Nikzad, SGA Jorsaraei
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FA
Publicado:	Babol University of Medical Sciences 2011
Materias:	cloning human jurisprudence and theology the holy quran Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/45ff5e87dd954ce5967b7208ba7ef6ba
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:45ff5e87dd954ce5967b7208ba7ef6ba
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:45ff5e87dd954ce5967b7208ba7ef6ba2021-11-10T08:56:58ZCloning from the Perspective of Theology and Jurisprudence1561-41072251-7170https://doaj.org/article/45ff5e87dd954ce5967b7208ba7ef6ba2011-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://jbums.org/article-1-3929-en.htmlhttps://doaj.org/toc/1561-4107https://doaj.org/toc/2251-7170BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cloning is one of the achievements in the field of experimental science in contemporary time, which is associated with many questions, serious challenges and sensitivity for experts, jurists, and ethics scholars that each of them has adopted different positions against it. The aim of this study was to survey the cloning from the perspective of theology and jurisprudence.METHODS: In this study, research on religious texts, book and tradition and also jurists votes and statements is the base of this study from the perspective of theology and jurisprudence in cloning sciences. In any jurisprudential debate, its related texts are considered as a document. FINDINGS: Cloning is not manipulation in the creation system and can not destroy the distinctions. Such individuals have dignity, worth and honor, and familial, environmental and educational factors can be effective in their personality structure. Cloning cannot be a factor to cancel a marriage and in many cases, parents provision for cloned individuals is applicable. Ambiguity in the issue of inheritance is also resolvable. In the context of the Holy Quran, we cannot find a compulsory commandment that natural reproduction is the only way for human beings to procreate and also there is no commandment for prohibition of cloning. CONCLUSION: While there is no strong reason to prohibit the cloning, it cannot be adjudged decisively about prohibition of cloning and it needs further investigation and discussion.A Nikzad,SGA JorsaraeiBabol University of Medical Sciencesarticlecloninghumanjurisprudence and theologythe holy quranMedicineRMedicine (General)R5-920ENFAMajallah-i Dānishgāh-i ̒Ulūm-i Pizishkī-i Bābul, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 80-88 (2011)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FA
topic	cloning human jurisprudence and theology the holy quran Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	cloning human jurisprudence and theology the holy quran Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920 A Nikzad, SGA Jorsaraei Cloning from the Perspective of Theology and Jurisprudence
description	BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cloning is one of the achievements in the field of experimental science in contemporary time, which is associated with many questions, serious challenges and sensitivity for experts, jurists, and ethics scholars that each of them has adopted different positions against it. The aim of this study was to survey the cloning from the perspective of theology and jurisprudence.METHODS: In this study, research on religious texts, book and tradition and also jurists votes and statements is the base of this study from the perspective of theology and jurisprudence in cloning sciences. In any jurisprudential debate, its related texts are considered as a document. FINDINGS: Cloning is not manipulation in the creation system and can not destroy the distinctions. Such individuals have dignity, worth and honor, and familial, environmental and educational factors can be effective in their personality structure. Cloning cannot be a factor to cancel a marriage and in many cases, parents provision for cloned individuals is applicable. Ambiguity in the issue of inheritance is also resolvable. In the context of the Holy Quran, we cannot find a compulsory commandment that natural reproduction is the only way for human beings to procreate and also there is no commandment for prohibition of cloning. CONCLUSION: While there is no strong reason to prohibit the cloning, it cannot be adjudged decisively about prohibition of cloning and it needs further investigation and discussion.
format	article
author	A Nikzad, SGA Jorsaraei
author_facet	A Nikzad, SGA Jorsaraei
author_sort	A Nikzad,
title	Cloning from the Perspective of Theology and Jurisprudence
title_short	Cloning from the Perspective of Theology and Jurisprudence
title_full	Cloning from the Perspective of Theology and Jurisprudence
title_fullStr	Cloning from the Perspective of Theology and Jurisprudence
title_full_unstemmed	Cloning from the Perspective of Theology and Jurisprudence
title_sort	cloning from the perspective of theology and jurisprudence
publisher	Babol University of Medical Sciences
publishDate	2011
url	https://doaj.org/article/45ff5e87dd954ce5967b7208ba7ef6ba
work_keys_str_mv	AT anikzad cloningfromtheperspectiveoftheologyandjurisprudence AT sgajorsaraei cloningfromtheperspectiveoftheologyandjurisprudence
_version_	1718440276984332288

Cloning from the Perspective of Theology and Jurisprudence

Ejemplares similares