Quantitative ultrasound assessment of the influence of roughness and healing time on osseointegration phenomena

Abstract The evolution of bone tissue quantity and quality in contact with the surface of orthopedic and dental implants is a strong determinant of the surgical outcome but remains difficult to be assessed quantitatively. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of a quantitative ult...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: M. Fraulob, R. Vayron, S. Le Cann, B. Lecuelle, Y. Hériveaux, H. Albini Lomami, C. H. Flouzat Lachaniette, G. Haïat
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2020
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/462f3dfc82d2444aac8ed00943d3dedd
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:462f3dfc82d2444aac8ed00943d3dedd
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:462f3dfc82d2444aac8ed00943d3dedd2021-12-02T12:40:40ZQuantitative ultrasound assessment of the influence of roughness and healing time on osseointegration phenomena10.1038/s41598-020-78806-02045-2322https://doaj.org/article/462f3dfc82d2444aac8ed00943d3dedd2020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78806-0https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The evolution of bone tissue quantity and quality in contact with the surface of orthopedic and dental implants is a strong determinant of the surgical outcome but remains difficult to be assessed quantitatively. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of a quantitative ultrasound (QUS) method to measure bone-implant interface (BII) properties. A dedicated animal model considering coin-shaped titanium implants with two levels of surface roughness (smooth, S a  = 0.49 µm and rough, S a  = 3.5 µm) allowed to work with a reproducible geometry and a planar interface. The implants were inserted in rabbit femurs and tibiae for 7 or 13 weeks. The ultrasonic response of the BII was measured ex vivo, leading to the determination of the 2-D spatial variations of bone in contact with the implant surface. Histological analysis was carried out to determine the bone-implant contact (BIC) ratio. The amplitude of the echo was significantly higher after 7 weeks of healing time compared to 13 weeks, for both smooth (p < 0.01) and rough (p < 0.05) implants. A negative correlation (R = − 0.63) was obtained between the ultrasonic response and the BIC. This QUS technique is more sensitive to changes of BII morphology compared to histological analyses.M. FraulobR. VayronS. Le CannB. LecuelleY. HériveauxH. Albini LomamiC. H. Flouzat LachanietteG. HaïatNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 10, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
M. Fraulob
R. Vayron
S. Le Cann
B. Lecuelle
Y. Hériveaux
H. Albini Lomami
C. H. Flouzat Lachaniette
G. Haïat
Quantitative ultrasound assessment of the influence of roughness and healing time on osseointegration phenomena
description Abstract The evolution of bone tissue quantity and quality in contact with the surface of orthopedic and dental implants is a strong determinant of the surgical outcome but remains difficult to be assessed quantitatively. The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of a quantitative ultrasound (QUS) method to measure bone-implant interface (BII) properties. A dedicated animal model considering coin-shaped titanium implants with two levels of surface roughness (smooth, S a  = 0.49 µm and rough, S a  = 3.5 µm) allowed to work with a reproducible geometry and a planar interface. The implants were inserted in rabbit femurs and tibiae for 7 or 13 weeks. The ultrasonic response of the BII was measured ex vivo, leading to the determination of the 2-D spatial variations of bone in contact with the implant surface. Histological analysis was carried out to determine the bone-implant contact (BIC) ratio. The amplitude of the echo was significantly higher after 7 weeks of healing time compared to 13 weeks, for both smooth (p < 0.01) and rough (p < 0.05) implants. A negative correlation (R = − 0.63) was obtained between the ultrasonic response and the BIC. This QUS technique is more sensitive to changes of BII morphology compared to histological analyses.
format article
author M. Fraulob
R. Vayron
S. Le Cann
B. Lecuelle
Y. Hériveaux
H. Albini Lomami
C. H. Flouzat Lachaniette
G. Haïat
author_facet M. Fraulob
R. Vayron
S. Le Cann
B. Lecuelle
Y. Hériveaux
H. Albini Lomami
C. H. Flouzat Lachaniette
G. Haïat
author_sort M. Fraulob
title Quantitative ultrasound assessment of the influence of roughness and healing time on osseointegration phenomena
title_short Quantitative ultrasound assessment of the influence of roughness and healing time on osseointegration phenomena
title_full Quantitative ultrasound assessment of the influence of roughness and healing time on osseointegration phenomena
title_fullStr Quantitative ultrasound assessment of the influence of roughness and healing time on osseointegration phenomena
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative ultrasound assessment of the influence of roughness and healing time on osseointegration phenomena
title_sort quantitative ultrasound assessment of the influence of roughness and healing time on osseointegration phenomena
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/462f3dfc82d2444aac8ed00943d3dedd
work_keys_str_mv AT mfraulob quantitativeultrasoundassessmentoftheinfluenceofroughnessandhealingtimeonosseointegrationphenomena
AT rvayron quantitativeultrasoundassessmentoftheinfluenceofroughnessandhealingtimeonosseointegrationphenomena
AT slecann quantitativeultrasoundassessmentoftheinfluenceofroughnessandhealingtimeonosseointegrationphenomena
AT blecuelle quantitativeultrasoundassessmentoftheinfluenceofroughnessandhealingtimeonosseointegrationphenomena
AT yheriveaux quantitativeultrasoundassessmentoftheinfluenceofroughnessandhealingtimeonosseointegrationphenomena
AT halbinilomami quantitativeultrasoundassessmentoftheinfluenceofroughnessandhealingtimeonosseointegrationphenomena
AT chflouzatlachaniette quantitativeultrasoundassessmentoftheinfluenceofroughnessandhealingtimeonosseointegrationphenomena
AT ghaiat quantitativeultrasoundassessmentoftheinfluenceofroughnessandhealingtimeonosseointegrationphenomena
_version_ 1718393735732002816