A (Thin) Boundary Not to Be Crossed, or "Lakṣmaṇ-rekhā"

This paper discusses the concept of lakṣmaṇ-rekhā that originates in the later Rāmāyaṇa tradition and for centuries has functioned as a metaphorical expression denoting a strict (moral) boundary that should not be crossed, as its transgression inevitably exposes one to danger. It has featured promi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Danuta Stasik
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/465ae73bb06f452e8b57b128e288fc71
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:465ae73bb06f452e8b57b128e288fc71
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:465ae73bb06f452e8b57b128e288fc712021-11-27T12:53:59ZA (Thin) Boundary Not to Be Crossed, or "Lakṣmaṇ-rekhā"10.12797/CIS.21.2019.02.081732-09172449-8696https://doaj.org/article/465ae73bb06f452e8b57b128e288fc712019-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/cis/article/view/1076https://doaj.org/toc/1732-0917https://doaj.org/toc/2449-8696 This paper discusses the concept of lakṣmaṇ-rekhā that originates in the later Rāmāyaṇa tradition and for centuries has functioned as a metaphorical expression denoting a strict (moral) boundary that should not be crossed, as its transgression inevitably exposes one to danger. It has featured prominently in Indian public discourse on female chastity and is also very much present in different socio-cultural and political contexts, often vocalised in literature, works of art, etc. In the concept of lakṣmaṇ-rekhā, one of the most basic and at the same time most important functions performed in culture by symbolic boundaries is manifested—the function of delineating the known, familiar, safe and permissible from the unknown, unfamiliar, dangerous, impermissible. Significantly, these boundaries have inherent moral weight and help individuals as well as whole societies to structure and regulate the universe they live in, on the micro- and macro-scale. In this paper, first I discuss textual evidence that can be found in wellknown Hindi Rāmāyaṇas such as the Rāmcaritmānas, the Rāmcandrikā and Rādheśyām Rāmāyaṇ, as well as in the Sūrsāgar. This analysis of literary material is meant to contextualise various levels of explicit and implicit meanings of the concept of lakṣmaṇ-rekhā that emerge from traditional sources in Hindi. In the second part of this article, I offer a survey of relevant Hindi dictionary entries and then focus on modern non-literary (and not only Hindi) usages of lakṣmaṇ-rekhā. Finally, I place the previously examined literary and linguistic material in the context of the findings of contemporary social scientists on the concept of symbolic boundaries (Epstein 1992). It is hoped that this study that gives emphasis to structuring and regulating (but not only) aspect of boundaries can contribute to our understanding of how broadly understood safety and values are negotiated in contemporary Indian society by way of drawing (ethical) boundaries and what happens if they are compromised. Danuta StasikKsiegarnia Akademicka Publishingarticlefemale chastityHindi literary traditionNorth Indian ethosRāmāyaṇaRāmcaritmānasRāmcandrikāIndo-Iranian languages and literaturePK1-9601Languages and literature of Eastern Asia, Africa, OceaniaPL1-8844ENCracow Indological Studies, Vol 21, Iss 2 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic female chastity
Hindi literary tradition
North Indian ethos
Rāmāyaṇa
Rāmcaritmānas
Rāmcandrikā
Indo-Iranian languages and literature
PK1-9601
Languages and literature of Eastern Asia, Africa, Oceania
PL1-8844
spellingShingle female chastity
Hindi literary tradition
North Indian ethos
Rāmāyaṇa
Rāmcaritmānas
Rāmcandrikā
Indo-Iranian languages and literature
PK1-9601
Languages and literature of Eastern Asia, Africa, Oceania
PL1-8844
Danuta Stasik
A (Thin) Boundary Not to Be Crossed, or "Lakṣmaṇ-rekhā"
description This paper discusses the concept of lakṣmaṇ-rekhā that originates in the later Rāmāyaṇa tradition and for centuries has functioned as a metaphorical expression denoting a strict (moral) boundary that should not be crossed, as its transgression inevitably exposes one to danger. It has featured prominently in Indian public discourse on female chastity and is also very much present in different socio-cultural and political contexts, often vocalised in literature, works of art, etc. In the concept of lakṣmaṇ-rekhā, one of the most basic and at the same time most important functions performed in culture by symbolic boundaries is manifested—the function of delineating the known, familiar, safe and permissible from the unknown, unfamiliar, dangerous, impermissible. Significantly, these boundaries have inherent moral weight and help individuals as well as whole societies to structure and regulate the universe they live in, on the micro- and macro-scale. In this paper, first I discuss textual evidence that can be found in wellknown Hindi Rāmāyaṇas such as the Rāmcaritmānas, the Rāmcandrikā and Rādheśyām Rāmāyaṇ, as well as in the Sūrsāgar. This analysis of literary material is meant to contextualise various levels of explicit and implicit meanings of the concept of lakṣmaṇ-rekhā that emerge from traditional sources in Hindi. In the second part of this article, I offer a survey of relevant Hindi dictionary entries and then focus on modern non-literary (and not only Hindi) usages of lakṣmaṇ-rekhā. Finally, I place the previously examined literary and linguistic material in the context of the findings of contemporary social scientists on the concept of symbolic boundaries (Epstein 1992). It is hoped that this study that gives emphasis to structuring and regulating (but not only) aspect of boundaries can contribute to our understanding of how broadly understood safety and values are negotiated in contemporary Indian society by way of drawing (ethical) boundaries and what happens if they are compromised.
format article
author Danuta Stasik
author_facet Danuta Stasik
author_sort Danuta Stasik
title A (Thin) Boundary Not to Be Crossed, or "Lakṣmaṇ-rekhā"
title_short A (Thin) Boundary Not to Be Crossed, or "Lakṣmaṇ-rekhā"
title_full A (Thin) Boundary Not to Be Crossed, or "Lakṣmaṇ-rekhā"
title_fullStr A (Thin) Boundary Not to Be Crossed, or "Lakṣmaṇ-rekhā"
title_full_unstemmed A (Thin) Boundary Not to Be Crossed, or "Lakṣmaṇ-rekhā"
title_sort (thin) boundary not to be crossed, or "lakṣmaṇ-rekhā"
publisher Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/465ae73bb06f452e8b57b128e288fc71
work_keys_str_mv AT danutastasik athinboundarynottobecrossedorlaksmanrekha
AT danutastasik thinboundarynottobecrossedorlaksmanrekha
_version_ 1718408983458349056