Evaluation of the relationship between corneal biomechanic and HbA1C levels in type 2 diabetes patients

Serpil Yazgan,1 Ugur Celik,2 Havva Kaldirim,3 Orhan Ayar,1 Ahmet Elbay,4 Veysel Aykut,2 Burcu Celik,5 Mehmet Taş6 1Department of Ophthalmology, Zonguldak Karaelmas University, Zonguldak, Turkey; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Gaziosmanpasa Taksim Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; 3D...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yazgan S, Celik U, Kaldirim H, Ayar O, Elbay A, Aykut V, Celik B, Taş M
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/46727bdeafba4bb5bf15cbc9373edde2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:46727bdeafba4bb5bf15cbc9373edde2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:46727bdeafba4bb5bf15cbc9373edde22021-12-02T00:35:27ZEvaluation of the relationship between corneal biomechanic and HbA1C levels in type 2 diabetes patients1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/46727bdeafba4bb5bf15cbc9373edde22014-08-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.dovepress.com/evaluation-of-the-relationship-between-corneal-biomechanic-and-hba1c-l-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483 Serpil Yazgan,1 Ugur Celik,2 Havva Kaldirim,3 Orhan Ayar,1 Ahmet Elbay,4 Veysel Aykut,2 Burcu Celik,5 Mehmet Taş6 1Department of Ophthalmology, Zonguldak Karaelmas University, Zonguldak, Turkey; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Gaziosmanpasa Taksim Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; 3Department of Ophthalmology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; 4Department of Ophthalmology, Pendik Government Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; 5Department of Ophthalmology, Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; 6Department of Ophthalmology, Malatya State Hospital, Malatya, Turkey Purpose: To evaluate the corneal biomechanical properties due to the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels using the ocular response analyzer (ORA) in the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods: ORA values were obtained from 156 eyes of subjects with type 2 DM and 74 eyes of healthy control subjects with similar age and sex. Subjects were divided into three groups: Group 1, healthy control subjects; Group 2, diabetes patients with HbA1C ≥7%; and Group 3, diabetes patients with HbA1C <7%. Corneal biomechanical parameters: corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated pressure (IOPg), and corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) measurements were obtained using ORA. Ultrasound pachymetry was used for measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT). Results: CH and CRF were significantly different in each of the three groups (P-values for CH respectively; Groups 1 and 2=0.008, Groups 1 and 3, and Groups 2 and 3, <0.001, and for CRF respectively; =0.002, <0.001, <0.001). CCT was significantly different between Groups 1 and 3 and Groups 2 and 3 (P<0.001) but was insignificant between Groups 1 and 2 (P=0.965). IOPcc was not different between Groups 1 and 2 (P=0.524), and Groups 2 and 3 (P=0.115), but was significantly different between Groups 1 and 3 (P=0.003). IOPg was statistically different between each of the three groups (respectively; Groups 1 and 2, P=0.015, Groups 1 and 3, and Groups 2 and 3, P<0.001). Conclusion: Both diabetes groups were affected in terms of corneal biomechanical properties when compared to healthy subjects, there was also a positive correlation between HbA1C level and intraocular pressure. Keywords: type 2 diabetes mellitus, HbA1C, ocular response analyzer, intraocular pressure, corneal biomechanical parametersYazgan SCelik UKaldirim HAyar OElbay AAykut VCelik BTaş MDove Medical PressarticleOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol 2014, Iss default, Pp 1549-1553 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Yazgan S
Celik U
Kaldirim H
Ayar O
Elbay A
Aykut V
Celik B
Taş M
Evaluation of the relationship between corneal biomechanic and HbA1C levels in type 2 diabetes patients
description Serpil Yazgan,1 Ugur Celik,2 Havva Kaldirim,3 Orhan Ayar,1 Ahmet Elbay,4 Veysel Aykut,2 Burcu Celik,5 Mehmet Taş6 1Department of Ophthalmology, Zonguldak Karaelmas University, Zonguldak, Turkey; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Gaziosmanpasa Taksim Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; 3Department of Ophthalmology, Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; 4Department of Ophthalmology, Pendik Government Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; 5Department of Ophthalmology, Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; 6Department of Ophthalmology, Malatya State Hospital, Malatya, Turkey Purpose: To evaluate the corneal biomechanical properties due to the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels using the ocular response analyzer (ORA) in the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods: ORA values were obtained from 156 eyes of subjects with type 2 DM and 74 eyes of healthy control subjects with similar age and sex. Subjects were divided into three groups: Group 1, healthy control subjects; Group 2, diabetes patients with HbA1C ≥7%; and Group 3, diabetes patients with HbA1C <7%. Corneal biomechanical parameters: corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated pressure (IOPg), and corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) measurements were obtained using ORA. Ultrasound pachymetry was used for measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT). Results: CH and CRF were significantly different in each of the three groups (P-values for CH respectively; Groups 1 and 2=0.008, Groups 1 and 3, and Groups 2 and 3, <0.001, and for CRF respectively; =0.002, <0.001, <0.001). CCT was significantly different between Groups 1 and 3 and Groups 2 and 3 (P<0.001) but was insignificant between Groups 1 and 2 (P=0.965). IOPcc was not different between Groups 1 and 2 (P=0.524), and Groups 2 and 3 (P=0.115), but was significantly different between Groups 1 and 3 (P=0.003). IOPg was statistically different between each of the three groups (respectively; Groups 1 and 2, P=0.015, Groups 1 and 3, and Groups 2 and 3, P<0.001). Conclusion: Both diabetes groups were affected in terms of corneal biomechanical properties when compared to healthy subjects, there was also a positive correlation between HbA1C level and intraocular pressure. Keywords: type 2 diabetes mellitus, HbA1C, ocular response analyzer, intraocular pressure, corneal biomechanical parameters
format article
author Yazgan S
Celik U
Kaldirim H
Ayar O
Elbay A
Aykut V
Celik B
Taş M
author_facet Yazgan S
Celik U
Kaldirim H
Ayar O
Elbay A
Aykut V
Celik B
Taş M
author_sort Yazgan S
title Evaluation of the relationship between corneal biomechanic and HbA1C levels in type 2 diabetes patients
title_short Evaluation of the relationship between corneal biomechanic and HbA1C levels in type 2 diabetes patients
title_full Evaluation of the relationship between corneal biomechanic and HbA1C levels in type 2 diabetes patients
title_fullStr Evaluation of the relationship between corneal biomechanic and HbA1C levels in type 2 diabetes patients
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the relationship between corneal biomechanic and HbA1C levels in type 2 diabetes patients
title_sort evaluation of the relationship between corneal biomechanic and hba1c levels in type 2 diabetes patients
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/46727bdeafba4bb5bf15cbc9373edde2
work_keys_str_mv AT yazgans evaluationoftherelationshipbetweencornealbiomechanicandhba1clevelsintype2diabetespatients
AT celiku evaluationoftherelationshipbetweencornealbiomechanicandhba1clevelsintype2diabetespatients
AT kaldirimh evaluationoftherelationshipbetweencornealbiomechanicandhba1clevelsintype2diabetespatients
AT ayaro evaluationoftherelationshipbetweencornealbiomechanicandhba1clevelsintype2diabetespatients
AT elbaya evaluationoftherelationshipbetweencornealbiomechanicandhba1clevelsintype2diabetespatients
AT aykutv evaluationoftherelationshipbetweencornealbiomechanicandhba1clevelsintype2diabetespatients
AT celikb evaluationoftherelationshipbetweencornealbiomechanicandhba1clevelsintype2diabetespatients
AT tasm evaluationoftherelationshipbetweencornealbiomechanicandhba1clevelsintype2diabetespatients
_version_ 1718403612259909632