Public Information Dispute Resolution (Perspective of the State Administrative Court Act and the Public Information Disclosure Act)

The specification in the study uses a qualitative analytical descriptive approach and uses a type of doctrinal legal research with normative legal research methods on synchronization and fair legal efforts in resolving public information disputes. The results of research and discussion in the thesis...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Baruna Poking Bagus Saputro
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN ID
Publicado:	Universitas Negeri Semarang 2021
Materias:	information commission administrative court public information dispute resolution synchronization Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720
Acceso en línea:	https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v7i1.38803 https://doaj.org/article/46d7f7f59f7b49619d96ba7839d6b42d
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:46d7f7f59f7b49619d96ba7839d6b42d
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:46d7f7f59f7b49619d96ba7839d6b42d2021-12-05T04:47:07ZPublic Information Dispute Resolution (Perspective of the State Administrative Court Act and the Public Information Disclosure Act)https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v7i1.388032252-6536https://doaj.org/article/46d7f7f59f7b49619d96ba7839d6b42d2021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ulj/article/view/38803https://doaj.org/toc/2252-6536The specification in the study uses a qualitative analytical descriptive approach and uses a type of doctrinal legal research with normative legal research methods on synchronization and fair legal efforts in resolving public information disputes. The results of research and discussion in the thesis are: First, contains synchronization of public information dispute settlement based on the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 1986regardingState Administrative Courts as amended by Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 9 of 2004 and most recently by Law Republic of Indonesia Number 51 of 2009 with Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 14 of 2008 regardingPublic Information Openness. Second, it contains legal remedies that are fair in resolving public information disputes. Conclusions based on the results of research and discussion include: First, synchronizing the settlement of public information disputes based on the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 1986 regarding State Administrative Courts as amended by the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 9 of 2004 and most recently by the Republic of Indonesia Law Indonesia Number 51 of 2009 with the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 14 of 2008 regardingPublic Information Openness can be done with a juridical analysis of the competence and position of the State Administrative Court and Information Commission, as well as legal synchronization of the relevant Law. Second, fair legal efforts in resolving public information disputes are carried out by juridical analysis based on the theory of justice. Finally, the author gives advice in the form of legislative review efforts to amend the relevant Law, based on apolitical configuration in democratic orders to be able to produce responsive legal products for the realization of legal certainty and justice.Baruna Poking Bagus SaputroUniversitas Negeri Semarangarticleinformation commissionadministrative courtpublic information dispute resolutionsynchronizationLaw in general. Comparative and uniform law. JurisprudenceK1-7720ENIDUnnes Law Journal, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 61-88 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN ID
topic	information commission administrative court public information dispute resolution synchronization Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720
spellingShingle	information commission administrative court public information dispute resolution synchronization Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence K1-7720 Baruna Poking Bagus Saputro Public Information Dispute Resolution (Perspective of the State Administrative Court Act and the Public Information Disclosure Act)
description	The specification in the study uses a qualitative analytical descriptive approach and uses a type of doctrinal legal research with normative legal research methods on synchronization and fair legal efforts in resolving public information disputes. The results of research and discussion in the thesis are: First, contains synchronization of public information dispute settlement based on the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 1986regardingState Administrative Courts as amended by Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 9 of 2004 and most recently by Law Republic of Indonesia Number 51 of 2009 with Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 14 of 2008 regardingPublic Information Openness. Second, it contains legal remedies that are fair in resolving public information disputes. Conclusions based on the results of research and discussion include: First, synchronizing the settlement of public information disputes based on the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5 of 1986 regarding State Administrative Courts as amended by the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 9 of 2004 and most recently by the Republic of Indonesia Law Indonesia Number 51 of 2009 with the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 14 of 2008 regardingPublic Information Openness can be done with a juridical analysis of the competence and position of the State Administrative Court and Information Commission, as well as legal synchronization of the relevant Law. Second, fair legal efforts in resolving public information disputes are carried out by juridical analysis based on the theory of justice. Finally, the author gives advice in the form of legislative review efforts to amend the relevant Law, based on apolitical configuration in democratic orders to be able to produce responsive legal products for the realization of legal certainty and justice.
format	article
author	Baruna Poking Bagus Saputro
author_facet	Baruna Poking Bagus Saputro
author_sort	Baruna Poking Bagus Saputro
title	Public Information Dispute Resolution (Perspective of the State Administrative Court Act and the Public Information Disclosure Act)
title_short	Public Information Dispute Resolution (Perspective of the State Administrative Court Act and the Public Information Disclosure Act)
title_full	Public Information Dispute Resolution (Perspective of the State Administrative Court Act and the Public Information Disclosure Act)
title_fullStr	Public Information Dispute Resolution (Perspective of the State Administrative Court Act and the Public Information Disclosure Act)
title_full_unstemmed	Public Information Dispute Resolution (Perspective of the State Administrative Court Act and the Public Information Disclosure Act)
title_sort	public information dispute resolution (perspective of the state administrative court act and the public information disclosure act)
publisher	Universitas Negeri Semarang
publishDate	2021
url	https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v7i1.38803 https://doaj.org/article/46d7f7f59f7b49619d96ba7839d6b42d
work_keys_str_mv	AT barunapokingbagussaputro publicinformationdisputeresolutionperspectiveofthestateadministrativecourtactandthepublicinformationdisclosureact
_version_	1718372607760269312

Public Information Dispute Resolution (Perspective of the State Administrative Court Act and the Public Information Disclosure Act)

Ejemplares similares