A review of methods to assess the economic impact of distributed medical education (DME) in Canada

Background: Canadian distributed medical education (DME) increased substantially in the last decade, resulting in positive economic impacts to local communities. A reliable and simple method to estimate economic contributions is essential to provide managers with information on the extent of these i...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim Lemky, Pierre Gagne, Jill Konkin, Karl Stobbe, Gervan Fearon, Sylvia Blom, Genevieve Maltais Lapointe
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Canadian Medical Education Journal 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/46de3c32d3334c56a763a3def0c1d641
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:46de3c32d3334c56a763a3def0c1d641
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:46de3c32d3334c56a763a3def0c1d6412021-12-01T22:45:22ZA review of methods to assess the economic impact of distributed medical education (DME) in Canada10.36834/cmej.433431923-1202https://doaj.org/article/46de3c32d3334c56a763a3def0c1d6412018-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cmej/article/view/43343https://doaj.org/toc/1923-1202Background: Canadian distributed medical education (DME) increased substantially in the last decade, resulting in positive economic impacts to local communities. A reliable and simple method to estimate economic contributions is essential to provide managers with information on the extent of these impacts. This review paper fills a gap in the literature by answering the question: What are the most applicable quantitative methods to assess the economic impact of Canadian DME programs? Methods: The literature is reviewed to identify economic assessment methods. These are evaluated and compared based on the benefits, challenges, data needs, outputs and potential for use in the DME context. Results: We identified five economic impact methods used in similar contexts. Two of these methods have the potential for Canadian DME programs: the Canadian Input-Output (I-O) model and the Simplified American Council on Education (ACE) method. Conclusion: Choice of a method is contingent on the ability to measure the salient economic impacts, and provide an output that facilitates sustainable decision making. This paper thus fills a gap by identifying methods applicable to DME. These methods will assist stakeholders to calculate economic impacts, resulting in both the advancement and sustainability of these programs over short- and long-term time frames. Kim LemkyPierre GagneJill KonkinKarl StobbeGervan FearonSylvia BlomGenevieve Maltais LapointeCanadian Medical Education JournalarticleDistributed Medical EducationLiterature ReviewEconomic ImpactEconomic Assessment MethodsCanadaEducation (General)L7-991Medicine (General)R5-920ENCanadian Medical Education Journal, Vol 9, Iss 1 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Distributed Medical Education
Literature Review
Economic Impact
Economic Assessment Methods
Canada
Education (General)
L7-991
Medicine (General)
R5-920
spellingShingle Distributed Medical Education
Literature Review
Economic Impact
Economic Assessment Methods
Canada
Education (General)
L7-991
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Kim Lemky
Pierre Gagne
Jill Konkin
Karl Stobbe
Gervan Fearon
Sylvia Blom
Genevieve Maltais Lapointe
A review of methods to assess the economic impact of distributed medical education (DME) in Canada
description Background: Canadian distributed medical education (DME) increased substantially in the last decade, resulting in positive economic impacts to local communities. A reliable and simple method to estimate economic contributions is essential to provide managers with information on the extent of these impacts. This review paper fills a gap in the literature by answering the question: What are the most applicable quantitative methods to assess the economic impact of Canadian DME programs? Methods: The literature is reviewed to identify economic assessment methods. These are evaluated and compared based on the benefits, challenges, data needs, outputs and potential for use in the DME context. Results: We identified five economic impact methods used in similar contexts. Two of these methods have the potential for Canadian DME programs: the Canadian Input-Output (I-O) model and the Simplified American Council on Education (ACE) method. Conclusion: Choice of a method is contingent on the ability to measure the salient economic impacts, and provide an output that facilitates sustainable decision making. This paper thus fills a gap by identifying methods applicable to DME. These methods will assist stakeholders to calculate economic impacts, resulting in both the advancement and sustainability of these programs over short- and long-term time frames.
format article
author Kim Lemky
Pierre Gagne
Jill Konkin
Karl Stobbe
Gervan Fearon
Sylvia Blom
Genevieve Maltais Lapointe
author_facet Kim Lemky
Pierre Gagne
Jill Konkin
Karl Stobbe
Gervan Fearon
Sylvia Blom
Genevieve Maltais Lapointe
author_sort Kim Lemky
title A review of methods to assess the economic impact of distributed medical education (DME) in Canada
title_short A review of methods to assess the economic impact of distributed medical education (DME) in Canada
title_full A review of methods to assess the economic impact of distributed medical education (DME) in Canada
title_fullStr A review of methods to assess the economic impact of distributed medical education (DME) in Canada
title_full_unstemmed A review of methods to assess the economic impact of distributed medical education (DME) in Canada
title_sort review of methods to assess the economic impact of distributed medical education (dme) in canada
publisher Canadian Medical Education Journal
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/46de3c32d3334c56a763a3def0c1d641
work_keys_str_mv AT kimlemky areviewofmethodstoassesstheeconomicimpactofdistributedmedicaleducationdmeincanada
AT pierregagne areviewofmethodstoassesstheeconomicimpactofdistributedmedicaleducationdmeincanada
AT jillkonkin areviewofmethodstoassesstheeconomicimpactofdistributedmedicaleducationdmeincanada
AT karlstobbe areviewofmethodstoassesstheeconomicimpactofdistributedmedicaleducationdmeincanada
AT gervanfearon areviewofmethodstoassesstheeconomicimpactofdistributedmedicaleducationdmeincanada
AT sylviablom areviewofmethodstoassesstheeconomicimpactofdistributedmedicaleducationdmeincanada
AT genevievemaltaislapointe areviewofmethodstoassesstheeconomicimpactofdistributedmedicaleducationdmeincanada
AT kimlemky reviewofmethodstoassesstheeconomicimpactofdistributedmedicaleducationdmeincanada
AT pierregagne reviewofmethodstoassesstheeconomicimpactofdistributedmedicaleducationdmeincanada
AT jillkonkin reviewofmethodstoassesstheeconomicimpactofdistributedmedicaleducationdmeincanada
AT karlstobbe reviewofmethodstoassesstheeconomicimpactofdistributedmedicaleducationdmeincanada
AT gervanfearon reviewofmethodstoassesstheeconomicimpactofdistributedmedicaleducationdmeincanada
AT sylviablom reviewofmethodstoassesstheeconomicimpactofdistributedmedicaleducationdmeincanada
AT genevievemaltaislapointe reviewofmethodstoassesstheeconomicimpactofdistributedmedicaleducationdmeincanada
_version_ 1718404036920606720