Comparison of the biometric measurements calculated with Zeiss IOL-Master and WaveLight OB-820

Georgios Labiris,1,2 Panagiota Ntonti,2 Konstantinos Ntitsos,2 Andreas Katsanos,2 Haris Sideroudi,2 Vasilios Kozobolis1,2 1Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, 2Eye Institute of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece Background: The primary objective of this study was to i...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Labiris G, Ntonti P, Ntitsos K, Katsanos A, Sideroudi H, Kozobolis V
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/46e3a5984ec64aa3ab462bf7ce108ad8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:46e3a5984ec64aa3ab462bf7ce108ad8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:46e3a5984ec64aa3ab462bf7ce108ad82021-12-02T04:25:53ZComparison of the biometric measurements calculated with Zeiss IOL-Master and WaveLight OB-8201177-5483https://doaj.org/article/46e3a5984ec64aa3ab462bf7ce108ad82017-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/comparison-of-the-biometric-measurements-calculated-with-zeiss-iol-mas-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483Georgios Labiris,1,2 Panagiota Ntonti,2 Konstantinos Ntitsos,2 Andreas Katsanos,2 Haris Sideroudi,2 Vasilios Kozobolis1,2 1Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, 2Eye Institute of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece Background: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the level of agreement between IOL-Master and OB-820 ocular biometers.Materials and methods: In this prospective randomized case series, we measured the anterior chamber depth (ACD), the axial length (AL), the corneal radii (R1, R2), the ratio of mean corneal radius and spherical equivalent and the corneal astigmatism (cylinder [Cyl]) before and after cataract extraction surgery.Results: Significant differences between pre- and postoperative data were observed for ACD for both biometric devices (P<0.01) and Cyl parameter in IOL-Master. Range and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were clinically significantly different for AL parameter pre- and postoperatively and for R2 and radius and spherical equivalent postoperatively (P<0.001). The rest of the parameters presented sufficient 95% LoA, which imply good agreement.Conclusion: In clinical practice, the IOL-master and OB-820 should not be used interchangeably due to discrepancy in the important AL parameter. Both biometers may provide consistent results regarding Cyl, ACD and R1. Keywords: cataract, IOL-Master, OB-820, biometry, level of agreementLabiris GNtonti PNtitsos KKatsanos ASideroudi HKozobolis VDove Medical PressarticleCataractIOL-MasterOB-820biometrylevel of agreementOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 11, Pp 753-758 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Cataract
IOL-Master
OB-820
biometry
level of agreement
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle Cataract
IOL-Master
OB-820
biometry
level of agreement
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Labiris G
Ntonti P
Ntitsos K
Katsanos A
Sideroudi H
Kozobolis V
Comparison of the biometric measurements calculated with Zeiss IOL-Master and WaveLight OB-820
description Georgios Labiris,1,2 Panagiota Ntonti,2 Konstantinos Ntitsos,2 Andreas Katsanos,2 Haris Sideroudi,2 Vasilios Kozobolis1,2 1Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, 2Eye Institute of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece Background: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the level of agreement between IOL-Master and OB-820 ocular biometers.Materials and methods: In this prospective randomized case series, we measured the anterior chamber depth (ACD), the axial length (AL), the corneal radii (R1, R2), the ratio of mean corneal radius and spherical equivalent and the corneal astigmatism (cylinder [Cyl]) before and after cataract extraction surgery.Results: Significant differences between pre- and postoperative data were observed for ACD for both biometric devices (P<0.01) and Cyl parameter in IOL-Master. Range and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were clinically significantly different for AL parameter pre- and postoperatively and for R2 and radius and spherical equivalent postoperatively (P<0.001). The rest of the parameters presented sufficient 95% LoA, which imply good agreement.Conclusion: In clinical practice, the IOL-master and OB-820 should not be used interchangeably due to discrepancy in the important AL parameter. Both biometers may provide consistent results regarding Cyl, ACD and R1. Keywords: cataract, IOL-Master, OB-820, biometry, level of agreement
format article
author Labiris G
Ntonti P
Ntitsos K
Katsanos A
Sideroudi H
Kozobolis V
author_facet Labiris G
Ntonti P
Ntitsos K
Katsanos A
Sideroudi H
Kozobolis V
author_sort Labiris G
title Comparison of the biometric measurements calculated with Zeiss IOL-Master and WaveLight OB-820
title_short Comparison of the biometric measurements calculated with Zeiss IOL-Master and WaveLight OB-820
title_full Comparison of the biometric measurements calculated with Zeiss IOL-Master and WaveLight OB-820
title_fullStr Comparison of the biometric measurements calculated with Zeiss IOL-Master and WaveLight OB-820
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the biometric measurements calculated with Zeiss IOL-Master and WaveLight OB-820
title_sort comparison of the biometric measurements calculated with zeiss iol-master and wavelight ob-820
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/46e3a5984ec64aa3ab462bf7ce108ad8
work_keys_str_mv AT labirisg comparisonofthebiometricmeasurementscalculatedwithzeissiolmasterandwavelightob820
AT ntontip comparisonofthebiometricmeasurementscalculatedwithzeissiolmasterandwavelightob820
AT ntitsosk comparisonofthebiometricmeasurementscalculatedwithzeissiolmasterandwavelightob820
AT katsanosa comparisonofthebiometricmeasurementscalculatedwithzeissiolmasterandwavelightob820
AT sideroudih comparisonofthebiometricmeasurementscalculatedwithzeissiolmasterandwavelightob820
AT kozobolisv comparisonofthebiometricmeasurementscalculatedwithzeissiolmasterandwavelightob820
_version_ 1718401180535619584