Fostering the Aesthetic Pleasure: The Effect of Verbal Description on Aesthetic Appreciation of Ambiguous and Unambiguous Artworks
Background: Aesthetic experience begins through an intentional shift from automatic visual perceptual processing to an aesthetic state of mind that is evidently directed towards sensory experience. In the present study, we investigated whether portrait descriptions affect the aesthetic pleasure of b...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/475e1d6cc2b14945843557b51e40a106 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:475e1d6cc2b14945843557b51e40a106 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:475e1d6cc2b14945843557b51e40a1062021-11-25T16:46:04ZFostering the Aesthetic Pleasure: The Effect of Verbal Description on Aesthetic Appreciation of Ambiguous and Unambiguous Artworks10.3390/bs111101442076-328Xhttps://doaj.org/article/475e1d6cc2b14945843557b51e40a1062021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/11/11/144https://doaj.org/toc/2076-328XBackground: Aesthetic experience begins through an intentional shift from automatic visual perceptual processing to an aesthetic state of mind that is evidently directed towards sensory experience. In the present study, we investigated whether portrait descriptions affect the aesthetic pleasure of both ambiguous (i.e., Arcimboldo’s portraits) and unambiguous portraits (i.e., Renaissance portraits). Method: A total sample of 86 participants were recruited and completed both a baseline and a retest session. In the retest session, we implemented a sample audio description for each portrait. The portraits were described by three types of treatment, namely global, local, and historical descriptions. Results: During the retest session, aesthetic pleasure was higher than the baseline. Both the local and the historical treatments improved the aesthetic appreciation of ambiguous portraits; instead, the global and the historical treatment improved aesthetic appreciation of Renaissance portraits during the retest session. Additionally, we found that the response times were slower in the retest session. Conclusion: taken together, these findings suggest that aesthetic preference was affected by the description of an artwork, likely due to a better knowledge of the painting, which prompts a more accurate (and slower) reading of the artwork.Emanuela MariAlessandro QuaglieriGiulia LausiMaddalena BocciaAlessandra PizzoMichela BaldiBenedetta BarchielliJessica BurraiLaura PiccardiAnna Maria GianniniMDPI AGarticleperceptual ambiguityglobal–local perceptionvisual aestheticportraitsaesthetic experiencePsychologyBF1-990ENBehavioral Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 144, p 144 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
perceptual ambiguity global–local perception visual aesthetic portraits aesthetic experience Psychology BF1-990 |
spellingShingle |
perceptual ambiguity global–local perception visual aesthetic portraits aesthetic experience Psychology BF1-990 Emanuela Mari Alessandro Quaglieri Giulia Lausi Maddalena Boccia Alessandra Pizzo Michela Baldi Benedetta Barchielli Jessica Burrai Laura Piccardi Anna Maria Giannini Fostering the Aesthetic Pleasure: The Effect of Verbal Description on Aesthetic Appreciation of Ambiguous and Unambiguous Artworks |
description |
Background: Aesthetic experience begins through an intentional shift from automatic visual perceptual processing to an aesthetic state of mind that is evidently directed towards sensory experience. In the present study, we investigated whether portrait descriptions affect the aesthetic pleasure of both ambiguous (i.e., Arcimboldo’s portraits) and unambiguous portraits (i.e., Renaissance portraits). Method: A total sample of 86 participants were recruited and completed both a baseline and a retest session. In the retest session, we implemented a sample audio description for each portrait. The portraits were described by three types of treatment, namely global, local, and historical descriptions. Results: During the retest session, aesthetic pleasure was higher than the baseline. Both the local and the historical treatments improved the aesthetic appreciation of ambiguous portraits; instead, the global and the historical treatment improved aesthetic appreciation of Renaissance portraits during the retest session. Additionally, we found that the response times were slower in the retest session. Conclusion: taken together, these findings suggest that aesthetic preference was affected by the description of an artwork, likely due to a better knowledge of the painting, which prompts a more accurate (and slower) reading of the artwork. |
format |
article |
author |
Emanuela Mari Alessandro Quaglieri Giulia Lausi Maddalena Boccia Alessandra Pizzo Michela Baldi Benedetta Barchielli Jessica Burrai Laura Piccardi Anna Maria Giannini |
author_facet |
Emanuela Mari Alessandro Quaglieri Giulia Lausi Maddalena Boccia Alessandra Pizzo Michela Baldi Benedetta Barchielli Jessica Burrai Laura Piccardi Anna Maria Giannini |
author_sort |
Emanuela Mari |
title |
Fostering the Aesthetic Pleasure: The Effect of Verbal Description on Aesthetic Appreciation of Ambiguous and Unambiguous Artworks |
title_short |
Fostering the Aesthetic Pleasure: The Effect of Verbal Description on Aesthetic Appreciation of Ambiguous and Unambiguous Artworks |
title_full |
Fostering the Aesthetic Pleasure: The Effect of Verbal Description on Aesthetic Appreciation of Ambiguous and Unambiguous Artworks |
title_fullStr |
Fostering the Aesthetic Pleasure: The Effect of Verbal Description on Aesthetic Appreciation of Ambiguous and Unambiguous Artworks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fostering the Aesthetic Pleasure: The Effect of Verbal Description on Aesthetic Appreciation of Ambiguous and Unambiguous Artworks |
title_sort |
fostering the aesthetic pleasure: the effect of verbal description on aesthetic appreciation of ambiguous and unambiguous artworks |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/475e1d6cc2b14945843557b51e40a106 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT emanuelamari fosteringtheaestheticpleasuretheeffectofverbaldescriptiononaestheticappreciationofambiguousandunambiguousartworks AT alessandroquaglieri fosteringtheaestheticpleasuretheeffectofverbaldescriptiononaestheticappreciationofambiguousandunambiguousartworks AT giulialausi fosteringtheaestheticpleasuretheeffectofverbaldescriptiononaestheticappreciationofambiguousandunambiguousartworks AT maddalenaboccia fosteringtheaestheticpleasuretheeffectofverbaldescriptiononaestheticappreciationofambiguousandunambiguousartworks AT alessandrapizzo fosteringtheaestheticpleasuretheeffectofverbaldescriptiononaestheticappreciationofambiguousandunambiguousartworks AT michelabaldi fosteringtheaestheticpleasuretheeffectofverbaldescriptiononaestheticappreciationofambiguousandunambiguousartworks AT benedettabarchielli fosteringtheaestheticpleasuretheeffectofverbaldescriptiononaestheticappreciationofambiguousandunambiguousartworks AT jessicaburrai fosteringtheaestheticpleasuretheeffectofverbaldescriptiononaestheticappreciationofambiguousandunambiguousartworks AT laurapiccardi fosteringtheaestheticpleasuretheeffectofverbaldescriptiononaestheticappreciationofambiguousandunambiguousartworks AT annamariagiannini fosteringtheaestheticpleasuretheeffectofverbaldescriptiononaestheticappreciationofambiguousandunambiguousartworks |
_version_ |
1718412951148298240 |