Data Consultations, Racism, and Critiquing Colonialism in Demographic Datasheets

Objective: We consider how data librarians can take antiracist action in education and consultations. We attempt to apply QuantCrit thinking, particularly to demographic datasheets. Methods: We synthesize historical context with modern critical thinking about race and data to examine the origins...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nina Exner, Erin Carrillo, Sam A. Leif
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: University of Massachusetts Medical School, Lamar Soutter Library 2021
Materias:
Z
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/476c6f3ced6d40e888f6e2d27578296b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:476c6f3ced6d40e888f6e2d27578296b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:476c6f3ced6d40e888f6e2d27578296b2021-11-18T17:42:56ZData Consultations, Racism, and Critiquing Colonialism in Demographic Datasheets10.7191/jeslib.2021.12132161-3974https://doaj.org/article/476c6f3ced6d40e888f6e2d27578296b2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://escholarship.umassmed.edu/jeslib/vol10/iss4/4/https://doaj.org/toc/2161-3974Objective: We consider how data librarians can take antiracist action in education and consultations. We attempt to apply QuantCrit thinking, particularly to demographic datasheets. Methods: We synthesize historical context with modern critical thinking about race and data to examine the origins of current assumptions about data. We then present examples of how racial categories can hide, rather than reveal, racial disparities. Finally, we apply the Model of Domain Learning to explain why data science and data management experts can and should expose experts in subject research to the idea of critically examining demographic data collection. Results: There are good reasons why patrons who are experts in topics other than racism can find it challenging to change habits from Interoperable approaches to race. Nevertheless, the Census categories explicitly say that they have no basis in research or science. Therefore, social justice requires that data librarians should expose researchers to this fact. If possible, data librarians should also consult on alternatives to habitual use of the Census racial categories. Conclusions: We suggest that many studies are harmed by including race and should remove it entirely. Those studies that are truly examining race should reflect on their research question and seek more relevant racial questions for data collection.Nina ExnerErin CarrilloSam A. LeifUniversity of Massachusetts Medical School, Lamar Soutter Libraryarticleantiracismdata consultationsdata collectionquantcritracial demographicssocial justicerace classificationdata categoriesBibliography. Library science. Information resourcesZENJournal of eScience Librarianship, Vol 10, Iss 4, p 1213 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic antiracism
data consultations
data collection
quantcrit
racial demographics
social justice
race classification
data categories
Bibliography. Library science. Information resources
Z
spellingShingle antiracism
data consultations
data collection
quantcrit
racial demographics
social justice
race classification
data categories
Bibliography. Library science. Information resources
Z
Nina Exner
Erin Carrillo
Sam A. Leif
Data Consultations, Racism, and Critiquing Colonialism in Demographic Datasheets
description Objective: We consider how data librarians can take antiracist action in education and consultations. We attempt to apply QuantCrit thinking, particularly to demographic datasheets. Methods: We synthesize historical context with modern critical thinking about race and data to examine the origins of current assumptions about data. We then present examples of how racial categories can hide, rather than reveal, racial disparities. Finally, we apply the Model of Domain Learning to explain why data science and data management experts can and should expose experts in subject research to the idea of critically examining demographic data collection. Results: There are good reasons why patrons who are experts in topics other than racism can find it challenging to change habits from Interoperable approaches to race. Nevertheless, the Census categories explicitly say that they have no basis in research or science. Therefore, social justice requires that data librarians should expose researchers to this fact. If possible, data librarians should also consult on alternatives to habitual use of the Census racial categories. Conclusions: We suggest that many studies are harmed by including race and should remove it entirely. Those studies that are truly examining race should reflect on their research question and seek more relevant racial questions for data collection.
format article
author Nina Exner
Erin Carrillo
Sam A. Leif
author_facet Nina Exner
Erin Carrillo
Sam A. Leif
author_sort Nina Exner
title Data Consultations, Racism, and Critiquing Colonialism in Demographic Datasheets
title_short Data Consultations, Racism, and Critiquing Colonialism in Demographic Datasheets
title_full Data Consultations, Racism, and Critiquing Colonialism in Demographic Datasheets
title_fullStr Data Consultations, Racism, and Critiquing Colonialism in Demographic Datasheets
title_full_unstemmed Data Consultations, Racism, and Critiquing Colonialism in Demographic Datasheets
title_sort data consultations, racism, and critiquing colonialism in demographic datasheets
publisher University of Massachusetts Medical School, Lamar Soutter Library
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/476c6f3ced6d40e888f6e2d27578296b
work_keys_str_mv AT ninaexner dataconsultationsracismandcritiquingcolonialismindemographicdatasheets
AT erincarrillo dataconsultationsracismandcritiquingcolonialismindemographicdatasheets
AT samaleif dataconsultationsracismandcritiquingcolonialismindemographicdatasheets
_version_ 1718420722301272064