Reduction of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis, Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcome.

Background Data: Reduction of the slipped vertebrae as a part of surgical approach is now attempted. In the current literature, the studies have paid attention to the surgical reduction of the slippage or in situ spinal fixation technique. These studies have a lack of comparison between these vari...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mohamed Eshra
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Egyptian Spine Association 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/477271b2acab4c44b6a0015e07f5d21a
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:477271b2acab4c44b6a0015e07f5d21a
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:477271b2acab4c44b6a0015e07f5d21a2021-12-02T04:49:51ZReduction of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis, Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcome.DOI:10.21608/ESJ.2013.38182314-89502314-8969https://doaj.org/article/477271b2acab4c44b6a0015e07f5d21a2013-04-01T00:00:00Zhttp://esj.journals.ekb.eg/article_3818.htmlhttps://doaj.org/toc/2314-8950https://doaj.org/toc/2314-8969Background Data: Reduction of the slipped vertebrae as a part of surgical approach is now attempted. In the current literature, the studies have paid attention to the surgical reduction of the slippage or in situ spinal fixation technique. These studies have a lack of comparison between these variable techniques. Purpose: To define the role and benefits of reduction and stabilization of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Study Design: A retrospective clinical case study. Patients and Methods: 24 patients with low grade isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis between January 2008 and June 2010 were enrolled for this study. Patients were treated by slip reduction, interbody fusion with or without cage and internal pedicle screw fixation. All patients had back pain and radicular pain for at least one year pre-operatively. All patients were examined by plain radiographs, CT scan and MRI. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used for pre and post-operative clinical assessment in all cases. Radiological assessment for bony fusion was done using plain radiography and CT scan. All patients were followed up both clinically and radiologically for at least one and half years. Results: The overall rate of neurological improvement after our procedures was 91%. Radicular pain improved earlier than back pain. Slip was reduced and satisfactory screw purchase was proved in all patients. Reported fusion rate was 92%. Operative and postoperative complications occurred in five patients but were minor and cured. Conclusion: Reduction of lumbar spondylolisthesis improved the clinical manifestations, increased the fusion rate and speed the return to normal or near normal life activities. (2013ESJ044)Mohamed EshraEgyptian Spine Associationarticlelumbar spineSpondylolisthesisReductionNeurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENEgyptian Spine Journal, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 38-44 (2013)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic lumbar spine
Spondylolisthesis
Reduction
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
spellingShingle lumbar spine
Spondylolisthesis
Reduction
Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system
RC346-429
Mohamed Eshra
Reduction of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis, Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcome.
description Background Data: Reduction of the slipped vertebrae as a part of surgical approach is now attempted. In the current literature, the studies have paid attention to the surgical reduction of the slippage or in situ spinal fixation technique. These studies have a lack of comparison between these variable techniques. Purpose: To define the role and benefits of reduction and stabilization of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Study Design: A retrospective clinical case study. Patients and Methods: 24 patients with low grade isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis between January 2008 and June 2010 were enrolled for this study. Patients were treated by slip reduction, interbody fusion with or without cage and internal pedicle screw fixation. All patients had back pain and radicular pain for at least one year pre-operatively. All patients were examined by plain radiographs, CT scan and MRI. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used for pre and post-operative clinical assessment in all cases. Radiological assessment for bony fusion was done using plain radiography and CT scan. All patients were followed up both clinically and radiologically for at least one and half years. Results: The overall rate of neurological improvement after our procedures was 91%. Radicular pain improved earlier than back pain. Slip was reduced and satisfactory screw purchase was proved in all patients. Reported fusion rate was 92%. Operative and postoperative complications occurred in five patients but were minor and cured. Conclusion: Reduction of lumbar spondylolisthesis improved the clinical manifestations, increased the fusion rate and speed the return to normal or near normal life activities. (2013ESJ044)
format article
author Mohamed Eshra
author_facet Mohamed Eshra
author_sort Mohamed Eshra
title Reduction of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis, Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcome.
title_short Reduction of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis, Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcome.
title_full Reduction of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis, Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcome.
title_fullStr Reduction of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis, Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcome.
title_full_unstemmed Reduction of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis, Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcome.
title_sort reduction of lumbar spondylolisthesis, surgical technique and clinical outcome.
publisher Egyptian Spine Association
publishDate 2013
url https://doaj.org/article/477271b2acab4c44b6a0015e07f5d21a
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedeshra reductionoflumbarspondylolisthesissurgicaltechniqueandclinicaloutcome
_version_ 1718401002805133312