Securing genetic integrity in freshwater pearl mussel propagation and captive breeding

Abstract Securing genetic integrity is of key importance in conservation-oriented captive breeding programs releasing juveniles into the wild. This is particularly true for species such as the endangered freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) for which a number of captive breeding fac...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juergen Geist, Helmut Bayerl, Bernhard C. Stoeckle, Ralph Kuehn
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/48004489dc5440e09ad313ee2968cf68
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:48004489dc5440e09ad313ee2968cf68
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:48004489dc5440e09ad313ee2968cf682021-12-02T14:53:34ZSecuring genetic integrity in freshwater pearl mussel propagation and captive breeding10.1038/s41598-021-95614-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/48004489dc5440e09ad313ee2968cf682021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95614-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Securing genetic integrity is of key importance in conservation-oriented captive breeding programs releasing juveniles into the wild. This is particularly true for species such as the endangered freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) for which a number of captive breeding facilities has been established in Europe. The core objective of this study was to compare the genetic constitution of 29 cohorts of captive-bred freshwater pearl mussels from five different breeding facilities in Austria, France, Luxembourg and Germany, with their original 14 source populations from nine major European drainages, based on microsatellite markers. Captive-bred mussels represented 11 different genetic clusters, suggesting an important contribution of the breeding stations to securing the genetic diversity of the species. In almost all cases, the cultured offspring closely resembled the genetic constitution of the source mussels as revealed from the STRUCTURE analysis and the generally high assignment of offspring to the original source populations. The majority of captive-bred cohorts had an increased inbreeding coefficient and decreased genetic variability compared to their source populations as measured by AR and HO. Highest numbers of deformed juveniles coincided with very low levels of HO < 0.05. Since erosion of genetic diversity in captive breeding was mostly evident in individual year-cohorts, long-term breeding over multiple years can minimize such effects. The systematic selection of priority populations for conservation, effective breeding strategies avoiding effects of in- and outbreeding by genetically informed selection of parent individuals, and a network of collaboration among the different breeding facilities would be very useful to increase resilience and effectiveness.Juergen GeistHelmut BayerlBernhard C. StoeckleRalph KuehnNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Juergen Geist
Helmut Bayerl
Bernhard C. Stoeckle
Ralph Kuehn
Securing genetic integrity in freshwater pearl mussel propagation and captive breeding
description Abstract Securing genetic integrity is of key importance in conservation-oriented captive breeding programs releasing juveniles into the wild. This is particularly true for species such as the endangered freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) for which a number of captive breeding facilities has been established in Europe. The core objective of this study was to compare the genetic constitution of 29 cohorts of captive-bred freshwater pearl mussels from five different breeding facilities in Austria, France, Luxembourg and Germany, with their original 14 source populations from nine major European drainages, based on microsatellite markers. Captive-bred mussels represented 11 different genetic clusters, suggesting an important contribution of the breeding stations to securing the genetic diversity of the species. In almost all cases, the cultured offspring closely resembled the genetic constitution of the source mussels as revealed from the STRUCTURE analysis and the generally high assignment of offspring to the original source populations. The majority of captive-bred cohorts had an increased inbreeding coefficient and decreased genetic variability compared to their source populations as measured by AR and HO. Highest numbers of deformed juveniles coincided with very low levels of HO < 0.05. Since erosion of genetic diversity in captive breeding was mostly evident in individual year-cohorts, long-term breeding over multiple years can minimize such effects. The systematic selection of priority populations for conservation, effective breeding strategies avoiding effects of in- and outbreeding by genetically informed selection of parent individuals, and a network of collaboration among the different breeding facilities would be very useful to increase resilience and effectiveness.
format article
author Juergen Geist
Helmut Bayerl
Bernhard C. Stoeckle
Ralph Kuehn
author_facet Juergen Geist
Helmut Bayerl
Bernhard C. Stoeckle
Ralph Kuehn
author_sort Juergen Geist
title Securing genetic integrity in freshwater pearl mussel propagation and captive breeding
title_short Securing genetic integrity in freshwater pearl mussel propagation and captive breeding
title_full Securing genetic integrity in freshwater pearl mussel propagation and captive breeding
title_fullStr Securing genetic integrity in freshwater pearl mussel propagation and captive breeding
title_full_unstemmed Securing genetic integrity in freshwater pearl mussel propagation and captive breeding
title_sort securing genetic integrity in freshwater pearl mussel propagation and captive breeding
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/48004489dc5440e09ad313ee2968cf68
work_keys_str_mv AT juergengeist securinggeneticintegrityinfreshwaterpearlmusselpropagationandcaptivebreeding
AT helmutbayerl securinggeneticintegrityinfreshwaterpearlmusselpropagationandcaptivebreeding
AT bernhardcstoeckle securinggeneticintegrityinfreshwaterpearlmusselpropagationandcaptivebreeding
AT ralphkuehn securinggeneticintegrityinfreshwaterpearlmusselpropagationandcaptivebreeding
_version_ 1718389443962863616