Comparison of patient and surgeon satisfaction in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy with peripheral nerve block versus spinal anesthesia

Objective. This study aims to compare two different methods of regional anesthesia applied for knee arthroscopy in terms of patient and surgeon satisfaction. Materials and Methods. Eighty patients who underwent knee arthroscopy either with spinal anesthesia (SA) or unilateral sciatic and femoral ner...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seray Turkmen, Mehmet Mutlu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Digital ProScholar Media 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/48183612494442fdba372cd63c823cb0
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:48183612494442fdba372cd63c823cb0
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:48183612494442fdba372cd63c823cb02021-11-23T17:08:56ZComparison of patient and surgeon satisfaction in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy with peripheral nerve block versus spinal anesthesia10.25083/2559.5555/6.2.102559-5555https://doaj.org/article/48183612494442fdba372cd63c823cb02021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.e-repository.org/jcis/6/2/10.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2559-5555Objective. This study aims to compare two different methods of regional anesthesia applied for knee arthroscopy in terms of patient and surgeon satisfaction. Materials and Methods. Eighty patients who underwent knee arthroscopy either with spinal anesthesia (SA) or unilateral sciatic and femoral nerve block (SFNB) were included in the study. A nurse conducted a blind study questionnaire to assess the surgeon and patient satisfaction from anesthesia performed at the end of the surgery. Pain score, demographical data, duration of surgery, motor and sensory block duration, time of first rescue analgesia were recorded and analyzed statistically. Results. A statistically significant difference was found between the patient (p = 0.001; p <0.01) and surgeon (p = 0.022; p <0.05) satisfaction rates, these being lower in the group with SFNB comparable to patients with spinal anesthesia. There was a statistically significant difference between the first analgesic requirements of the patients according to the groups (p = 0.001; p <0.01). The first analgesic requirement of the patients who received SFNB was later than in the case of patients who received spinal anesthesia. Conclusions. Patient and surgeon satisfaction with SA was significantly higher than SFNB. The peripheral nerve blocks are inadequate for patient and surgeon satisfaction for knee arthroscopy compared to SA.Seray TurkmenMehmet MutluDigital ProScholar Mediaarticleknee arthroscopysatisfactionregional anesthesiaMedicineRENJournal of Clinical and Investigative Surgery, Vol 6, Iss 2, Pp 148-152 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic knee arthroscopy
satisfaction
regional anesthesia
Medicine
R
spellingShingle knee arthroscopy
satisfaction
regional anesthesia
Medicine
R
Seray Turkmen
Mehmet Mutlu
Comparison of patient and surgeon satisfaction in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy with peripheral nerve block versus spinal anesthesia
description Objective. This study aims to compare two different methods of regional anesthesia applied for knee arthroscopy in terms of patient and surgeon satisfaction. Materials and Methods. Eighty patients who underwent knee arthroscopy either with spinal anesthesia (SA) or unilateral sciatic and femoral nerve block (SFNB) were included in the study. A nurse conducted a blind study questionnaire to assess the surgeon and patient satisfaction from anesthesia performed at the end of the surgery. Pain score, demographical data, duration of surgery, motor and sensory block duration, time of first rescue analgesia were recorded and analyzed statistically. Results. A statistically significant difference was found between the patient (p = 0.001; p <0.01) and surgeon (p = 0.022; p <0.05) satisfaction rates, these being lower in the group with SFNB comparable to patients with spinal anesthesia. There was a statistically significant difference between the first analgesic requirements of the patients according to the groups (p = 0.001; p <0.01). The first analgesic requirement of the patients who received SFNB was later than in the case of patients who received spinal anesthesia. Conclusions. Patient and surgeon satisfaction with SA was significantly higher than SFNB. The peripheral nerve blocks are inadequate for patient and surgeon satisfaction for knee arthroscopy compared to SA.
format article
author Seray Turkmen
Mehmet Mutlu
author_facet Seray Turkmen
Mehmet Mutlu
author_sort Seray Turkmen
title Comparison of patient and surgeon satisfaction in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy with peripheral nerve block versus spinal anesthesia
title_short Comparison of patient and surgeon satisfaction in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy with peripheral nerve block versus spinal anesthesia
title_full Comparison of patient and surgeon satisfaction in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy with peripheral nerve block versus spinal anesthesia
title_fullStr Comparison of patient and surgeon satisfaction in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy with peripheral nerve block versus spinal anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of patient and surgeon satisfaction in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy with peripheral nerve block versus spinal anesthesia
title_sort comparison of patient and surgeon satisfaction in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy with peripheral nerve block versus spinal anesthesia
publisher Digital ProScholar Media
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/48183612494442fdba372cd63c823cb0
work_keys_str_mv AT serayturkmen comparisonofpatientandsurgeonsatisfactioninpatientsundergoingkneearthroscopywithperipheralnerveblockversusspinalanesthesia
AT mehmetmutlu comparisonofpatientandsurgeonsatisfactioninpatientsundergoingkneearthroscopywithperipheralnerveblockversusspinalanesthesia
_version_ 1718416205452148736