PARADOXES OF ARAB POLITICAL SYSTEMS CHANGES

This article explores the antinomies of development of different Arab political systems, drawing on the theory of social order by D. North, J. Wallis and B. Weingast. The author analyses all Arab countries as "orders of limited access", mature or fragile. This approach enables the author t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	V. A. Kusnetsov
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	MGIMO University Press 2018
Materias:	arab political systems electoral processes in mena region democratization of the arab world non-state actors in mena modern and archaic in the middle east International relations JZ2-6530
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/48232364933441a39076ee506d91bcd7
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:48232364933441a39076ee506d91bcd7
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:48232364933441a39076ee506d91bcd72021-11-23T14:50:41ZPARADOXES OF ARAB POLITICAL SYSTEMS CHANGES2071-81602541-909910.24833/2071-8160-2018-5-62-23-48https://doaj.org/article/48232364933441a39076ee506d91bcd72018-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/804https://doaj.org/toc/2071-8160https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9099This article explores the antinomies of development of different Arab political systems, drawing on the theory of social order by D. North, J. Wallis and B. Weingast. The author analyses all Arab countries as "orders of limited access", mature or fragile. This approach enables the author to follow the rationale of political development in fragile and failed states, as well as the logic of how political relations form in quasi-states, without raising the question of statehood as such. However, the level of generalization inherent in the theory of social order impedes an analysis of the diverse political reality as we encounter in the Middle East. Therefore, the author (enhances the theoretical framework), identifying three models of political transformation in the Arab world: the Levant-Iraqi, North African and Gulf-Libyan models. Each of these models is organized in its own way, not only in socio-political terms, but also has been developing according to its own logic over the past several decades. In 2010 and 2011, all Arab states were faced with the same, well-known set of challenges and threats. And though responses to these differed case by case and were predetermined by the belonging of a particular system to a particular transformational model, the result was the same: the emergence of drivers of future change, applicable to the entire region. From the author's perspective, these drivers have included: first, a kind of «future phobia», which drives the political behavior of both masses and elites; and second, economic crisis, with which most governments of the region have struggled. At first glance, the political transformations occurring as a result of these drivers appear similar. Democratic procedures, electoral processes and the role of civil society appear to have strengthened and play an increasingly prominent role. The paradox is that, in practice, the above-described regional trends can entail very different social-political consequences, presaging modernization in some places, while driving the archaization of the state in others, depending on which model the respective state belongs to. At the same time, these processes of modernization and archaization stand in a complex relationship with the processes of strengthening / weakening of "orders of limited access": while, tactically, the majority of conscious actions taken by elites is aimed at strengthening "orders of limited access", in the long run, such actions can raise risks and weaken political systems.V. A. KusnetsovMGIMO University Pressarticlearab political systemselectoral processes in mena regiondemocratization of the arab worldnon-state actors in menamodern and archaic in the middle eastInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, Vol 0, Iss 5(62), Pp 23-48 (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	arab political systems electoral processes in mena region democratization of the arab world non-state actors in mena modern and archaic in the middle east International relations JZ2-6530
spellingShingle	arab political systems electoral processes in mena region democratization of the arab world non-state actors in mena modern and archaic in the middle east International relations JZ2-6530 V. A. Kusnetsov PARADOXES OF ARAB POLITICAL SYSTEMS CHANGES
description	This article explores the antinomies of development of different Arab political systems, drawing on the theory of social order by D. North, J. Wallis and B. Weingast. The author analyses all Arab countries as "orders of limited access", mature or fragile. This approach enables the author to follow the rationale of political development in fragile and failed states, as well as the logic of how political relations form in quasi-states, without raising the question of statehood as such. However, the level of generalization inherent in the theory of social order impedes an analysis of the diverse political reality as we encounter in the Middle East. Therefore, the author (enhances the theoretical framework), identifying three models of political transformation in the Arab world: the Levant-Iraqi, North African and Gulf-Libyan models. Each of these models is organized in its own way, not only in socio-political terms, but also has been developing according to its own logic over the past several decades. In 2010 and 2011, all Arab states were faced with the same, well-known set of challenges and threats. And though responses to these differed case by case and were predetermined by the belonging of a particular system to a particular transformational model, the result was the same: the emergence of drivers of future change, applicable to the entire region. From the author's perspective, these drivers have included: first, a kind of «future phobia», which drives the political behavior of both masses and elites; and second, economic crisis, with which most governments of the region have struggled. At first glance, the political transformations occurring as a result of these drivers appear similar. Democratic procedures, electoral processes and the role of civil society appear to have strengthened and play an increasingly prominent role. The paradox is that, in practice, the above-described regional trends can entail very different social-political consequences, presaging modernization in some places, while driving the archaization of the state in others, depending on which model the respective state belongs to. At the same time, these processes of modernization and archaization stand in a complex relationship with the processes of strengthening / weakening of "orders of limited access": while, tactically, the majority of conscious actions taken by elites is aimed at strengthening "orders of limited access", in the long run, such actions can raise risks and weaken political systems.
format	article
author	V. A. Kusnetsov
author_facet	V. A. Kusnetsov
author_sort	V. A. Kusnetsov
title	PARADOXES OF ARAB POLITICAL SYSTEMS CHANGES
title_short	PARADOXES OF ARAB POLITICAL SYSTEMS CHANGES
title_full	PARADOXES OF ARAB POLITICAL SYSTEMS CHANGES
title_fullStr	PARADOXES OF ARAB POLITICAL SYSTEMS CHANGES
title_full_unstemmed	PARADOXES OF ARAB POLITICAL SYSTEMS CHANGES
title_sort	paradoxes of arab political systems changes
publisher	MGIMO University Press
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/48232364933441a39076ee506d91bcd7
work_keys_str_mv	AT vakusnetsov paradoxesofarabpoliticalsystemschanges
_version_	1718416643293446144

PARADOXES OF ARAB POLITICAL SYSTEMS CHANGES

Ejemplares similares