Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions

Abstract Terrestrial ecosystems play a vital role in regulating the accumulation of carbon (C) in the atmosphere. Understanding the factors controlling land C uptake is critical for reducing uncertainties in projections of future climate. The relative importance of changing climate, rising atmospher...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D. N. Huntzinger, A. M. Michalak, C. Schwalm, P. Ciais, A. W. King, Y. Fang, K. Schaefer, Y. Wei, R. B. Cook, J. B. Fisher, D. Hayes, M. Huang, A. Ito, A. K. Jain, H. Lei, C. Lu, F. Maignan, J. Mao, N. Parazoo, S. Peng, B. Poulter, D. Ricciuto, X. Shi, H. Tian, W. Wang, N. Zeng, F. Zhao
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/48391161281440d180e9a93859b0a888
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:48391161281440d180e9a93859b0a888
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:48391161281440d180e9a93859b0a8882021-12-02T11:52:17ZUncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions10.1038/s41598-017-03818-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/48391161281440d180e9a93859b0a8882017-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03818-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Terrestrial ecosystems play a vital role in regulating the accumulation of carbon (C) in the atmosphere. Understanding the factors controlling land C uptake is critical for reducing uncertainties in projections of future climate. The relative importance of changing climate, rising atmospheric CO2, and other factors, however, remains unclear despite decades of research. Here, we use an ensemble of land models to show that models disagree on the primary driver of cumulative C uptake for 85% of vegetated land area. Disagreement is largest in model sensitivity to rising atmospheric CO2 which shows almost twice the variability in cumulative land uptake since 1901 (1 s.d. of 212.8 PgC vs. 138.5 PgC, respectively). We find that variability in CO2 and temperature sensitivity is attributable, in part, to their compensatory effects on C uptake, whereby comparable estimates of C uptake can arise by invoking different sensitivities to key environmental conditions. Conversely, divergent estimates of C uptake can occur despite being based on the same environmental sensitivities. Together, these findings imply an important limitation to the predictability of C cycling and climate under unprecedented environmental conditions. We suggest that the carbon modeling community prioritize a probabilistic multi-model approach to generate more robust C cycle projections.D. N. HuntzingerA. M. MichalakC. SchwalmP. CiaisA. W. KingY. FangK. SchaeferY. WeiR. B. CookJ. B. FisherD. HayesM. HuangA. ItoA. K. JainH. LeiC. LuF. MaignanJ. MaoN. ParazooS. PengB. PoulterD. RicciutoX. ShiH. TianW. WangN. ZengF. ZhaoNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
D. N. Huntzinger
A. M. Michalak
C. Schwalm
P. Ciais
A. W. King
Y. Fang
K. Schaefer
Y. Wei
R. B. Cook
J. B. Fisher
D. Hayes
M. Huang
A. Ito
A. K. Jain
H. Lei
C. Lu
F. Maignan
J. Mao
N. Parazoo
S. Peng
B. Poulter
D. Ricciuto
X. Shi
H. Tian
W. Wang
N. Zeng
F. Zhao
Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions
description Abstract Terrestrial ecosystems play a vital role in regulating the accumulation of carbon (C) in the atmosphere. Understanding the factors controlling land C uptake is critical for reducing uncertainties in projections of future climate. The relative importance of changing climate, rising atmospheric CO2, and other factors, however, remains unclear despite decades of research. Here, we use an ensemble of land models to show that models disagree on the primary driver of cumulative C uptake for 85% of vegetated land area. Disagreement is largest in model sensitivity to rising atmospheric CO2 which shows almost twice the variability in cumulative land uptake since 1901 (1 s.d. of 212.8 PgC vs. 138.5 PgC, respectively). We find that variability in CO2 and temperature sensitivity is attributable, in part, to their compensatory effects on C uptake, whereby comparable estimates of C uptake can arise by invoking different sensitivities to key environmental conditions. Conversely, divergent estimates of C uptake can occur despite being based on the same environmental sensitivities. Together, these findings imply an important limitation to the predictability of C cycling and climate under unprecedented environmental conditions. We suggest that the carbon modeling community prioritize a probabilistic multi-model approach to generate more robust C cycle projections.
format article
author D. N. Huntzinger
A. M. Michalak
C. Schwalm
P. Ciais
A. W. King
Y. Fang
K. Schaefer
Y. Wei
R. B. Cook
J. B. Fisher
D. Hayes
M. Huang
A. Ito
A. K. Jain
H. Lei
C. Lu
F. Maignan
J. Mao
N. Parazoo
S. Peng
B. Poulter
D. Ricciuto
X. Shi
H. Tian
W. Wang
N. Zeng
F. Zhao
author_facet D. N. Huntzinger
A. M. Michalak
C. Schwalm
P. Ciais
A. W. King
Y. Fang
K. Schaefer
Y. Wei
R. B. Cook
J. B. Fisher
D. Hayes
M. Huang
A. Ito
A. K. Jain
H. Lei
C. Lu
F. Maignan
J. Mao
N. Parazoo
S. Peng
B. Poulter
D. Ricciuto
X. Shi
H. Tian
W. Wang
N. Zeng
F. Zhao
author_sort D. N. Huntzinger
title Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions
title_short Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions
title_full Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions
title_fullStr Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions
title_full_unstemmed Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions
title_sort uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/48391161281440d180e9a93859b0a888
work_keys_str_mv AT dnhuntzinger uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT ammichalak uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT cschwalm uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT pciais uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT awking uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT yfang uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT kschaefer uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT ywei uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT rbcook uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT jbfisher uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT dhayes uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT mhuang uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT aito uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT akjain uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT hlei uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT clu uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT fmaignan uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT jmao uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT nparazoo uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT speng uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT bpoulter uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT dricciuto uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT xshi uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT htian uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT wwang uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT nzeng uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
AT fzhao uncertaintyintheresponseofterrestrialcarbonsinktoenvironmentaldriversunderminescarbonclimatefeedbackpredictions
_version_ 1718395100481978368