Biophysical Properties of Foamed and Solid Polymers Used in Orthotics and Prosthetics

Orthotic and prosthetic materials should have good mechanical and antibacterial properties. Therefore, in our study, we consider four common foamed closed-cells and two solid polymeric materials regarding their mechanical behaviour and tendency for bacterial adhesion. For all materials, the surface...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klemen Bohinc, Anže Abram, Anamarija Zore, Roman Štukelj, Ana Lenarčič, Rajko Vidrih, Andrijana Sever Škapin
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
T
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/48898fa837b745e7a18f1e11535eddfb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:48898fa837b745e7a18f1e11535eddfb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:48898fa837b745e7a18f1e11535eddfb2021-11-25T18:14:23ZBiophysical Properties of Foamed and Solid Polymers Used in Orthotics and Prosthetics10.3390/ma142268771996-1944https://doaj.org/article/48898fa837b745e7a18f1e11535eddfb2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/22/6877https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1944Orthotic and prosthetic materials should have good mechanical and antibacterial properties. Therefore, in our study, we consider four common foamed closed-cells and two solid polymeric materials regarding their mechanical behaviour and tendency for bacterial adhesion. For all materials, the surface roughness, hydrophobicity, zeta potential, tensile properties, hardness and CIE color parameters were measured. We found that foamed polymeric materials have higher roughness, higher hydrophobicity, lower Young’s modulus, lower maximum tensile strength and lower hardness than solid materials. Bacterial adhesion test measurements based on observation by scanning electron microscopy show much a lower adhesion extent of <i>S. aureus</i> on solid materials than on foamed materials. The measured biophysical properties could be the key data for users to select the optimal materials.Klemen BohincAnže AbramAnamarija ZoreRoman ŠtukeljAna LenarčičRajko VidrihAndrijana Sever ŠkapinMDPI AGarticlesurface characterizationbacterial adhesionprosthetic and orthotic materialsurfacesfoamed materialsTechnologyTElectrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineeringTK1-9971Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040MicroscopyQH201-278.5Descriptive and experimental mechanicsQC120-168.85ENMaterials, Vol 14, Iss 6877, p 6877 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic surface characterization
bacterial adhesion
prosthetic and orthotic material
surfaces
foamed materials
Technology
T
Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
TK1-9971
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Microscopy
QH201-278.5
Descriptive and experimental mechanics
QC120-168.85
spellingShingle surface characterization
bacterial adhesion
prosthetic and orthotic material
surfaces
foamed materials
Technology
T
Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
TK1-9971
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Microscopy
QH201-278.5
Descriptive and experimental mechanics
QC120-168.85
Klemen Bohinc
Anže Abram
Anamarija Zore
Roman Štukelj
Ana Lenarčič
Rajko Vidrih
Andrijana Sever Škapin
Biophysical Properties of Foamed and Solid Polymers Used in Orthotics and Prosthetics
description Orthotic and prosthetic materials should have good mechanical and antibacterial properties. Therefore, in our study, we consider four common foamed closed-cells and two solid polymeric materials regarding their mechanical behaviour and tendency for bacterial adhesion. For all materials, the surface roughness, hydrophobicity, zeta potential, tensile properties, hardness and CIE color parameters were measured. We found that foamed polymeric materials have higher roughness, higher hydrophobicity, lower Young’s modulus, lower maximum tensile strength and lower hardness than solid materials. Bacterial adhesion test measurements based on observation by scanning electron microscopy show much a lower adhesion extent of <i>S. aureus</i> on solid materials than on foamed materials. The measured biophysical properties could be the key data for users to select the optimal materials.
format article
author Klemen Bohinc
Anže Abram
Anamarija Zore
Roman Štukelj
Ana Lenarčič
Rajko Vidrih
Andrijana Sever Škapin
author_facet Klemen Bohinc
Anže Abram
Anamarija Zore
Roman Štukelj
Ana Lenarčič
Rajko Vidrih
Andrijana Sever Škapin
author_sort Klemen Bohinc
title Biophysical Properties of Foamed and Solid Polymers Used in Orthotics and Prosthetics
title_short Biophysical Properties of Foamed and Solid Polymers Used in Orthotics and Prosthetics
title_full Biophysical Properties of Foamed and Solid Polymers Used in Orthotics and Prosthetics
title_fullStr Biophysical Properties of Foamed and Solid Polymers Used in Orthotics and Prosthetics
title_full_unstemmed Biophysical Properties of Foamed and Solid Polymers Used in Orthotics and Prosthetics
title_sort biophysical properties of foamed and solid polymers used in orthotics and prosthetics
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/48898fa837b745e7a18f1e11535eddfb
work_keys_str_mv AT klemenbohinc biophysicalpropertiesoffoamedandsolidpolymersusedinorthoticsandprosthetics
AT anzeabram biophysicalpropertiesoffoamedandsolidpolymersusedinorthoticsandprosthetics
AT anamarijazore biophysicalpropertiesoffoamedandsolidpolymersusedinorthoticsandprosthetics
AT romanstukelj biophysicalpropertiesoffoamedandsolidpolymersusedinorthoticsandprosthetics
AT analenarcic biophysicalpropertiesoffoamedandsolidpolymersusedinorthoticsandprosthetics
AT rajkovidrih biophysicalpropertiesoffoamedandsolidpolymersusedinorthoticsandprosthetics
AT andrijanaseverskapin biophysicalpropertiesoffoamedandsolidpolymersusedinorthoticsandprosthetics
_version_ 1718411435037425664