Biophysical Properties of Foamed and Solid Polymers Used in Orthotics and Prosthetics
Orthotic and prosthetic materials should have good mechanical and antibacterial properties. Therefore, in our study, we consider four common foamed closed-cells and two solid polymeric materials regarding their mechanical behaviour and tendency for bacterial adhesion. For all materials, the surface...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/48898fa837b745e7a18f1e11535eddfb |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:48898fa837b745e7a18f1e11535eddfb |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:48898fa837b745e7a18f1e11535eddfb2021-11-25T18:14:23ZBiophysical Properties of Foamed and Solid Polymers Used in Orthotics and Prosthetics10.3390/ma142268771996-1944https://doaj.org/article/48898fa837b745e7a18f1e11535eddfb2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/22/6877https://doaj.org/toc/1996-1944Orthotic and prosthetic materials should have good mechanical and antibacterial properties. Therefore, in our study, we consider four common foamed closed-cells and two solid polymeric materials regarding their mechanical behaviour and tendency for bacterial adhesion. For all materials, the surface roughness, hydrophobicity, zeta potential, tensile properties, hardness and CIE color parameters were measured. We found that foamed polymeric materials have higher roughness, higher hydrophobicity, lower Young’s modulus, lower maximum tensile strength and lower hardness than solid materials. Bacterial adhesion test measurements based on observation by scanning electron microscopy show much a lower adhesion extent of <i>S. aureus</i> on solid materials than on foamed materials. The measured biophysical properties could be the key data for users to select the optimal materials.Klemen BohincAnže AbramAnamarija ZoreRoman ŠtukeljAna LenarčičRajko VidrihAndrijana Sever ŠkapinMDPI AGarticlesurface characterizationbacterial adhesionprosthetic and orthotic materialsurfacesfoamed materialsTechnologyTElectrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineeringTK1-9971Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040MicroscopyQH201-278.5Descriptive and experimental mechanicsQC120-168.85ENMaterials, Vol 14, Iss 6877, p 6877 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
surface characterization bacterial adhesion prosthetic and orthotic material surfaces foamed materials Technology T Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering TK1-9971 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Microscopy QH201-278.5 Descriptive and experimental mechanics QC120-168.85 |
spellingShingle |
surface characterization bacterial adhesion prosthetic and orthotic material surfaces foamed materials Technology T Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering TK1-9971 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Microscopy QH201-278.5 Descriptive and experimental mechanics QC120-168.85 Klemen Bohinc Anže Abram Anamarija Zore Roman Štukelj Ana Lenarčič Rajko Vidrih Andrijana Sever Škapin Biophysical Properties of Foamed and Solid Polymers Used in Orthotics and Prosthetics |
description |
Orthotic and prosthetic materials should have good mechanical and antibacterial properties. Therefore, in our study, we consider four common foamed closed-cells and two solid polymeric materials regarding their mechanical behaviour and tendency for bacterial adhesion. For all materials, the surface roughness, hydrophobicity, zeta potential, tensile properties, hardness and CIE color parameters were measured. We found that foamed polymeric materials have higher roughness, higher hydrophobicity, lower Young’s modulus, lower maximum tensile strength and lower hardness than solid materials. Bacterial adhesion test measurements based on observation by scanning electron microscopy show much a lower adhesion extent of <i>S. aureus</i> on solid materials than on foamed materials. The measured biophysical properties could be the key data for users to select the optimal materials. |
format |
article |
author |
Klemen Bohinc Anže Abram Anamarija Zore Roman Štukelj Ana Lenarčič Rajko Vidrih Andrijana Sever Škapin |
author_facet |
Klemen Bohinc Anže Abram Anamarija Zore Roman Štukelj Ana Lenarčič Rajko Vidrih Andrijana Sever Škapin |
author_sort |
Klemen Bohinc |
title |
Biophysical Properties of Foamed and Solid Polymers Used in Orthotics and Prosthetics |
title_short |
Biophysical Properties of Foamed and Solid Polymers Used in Orthotics and Prosthetics |
title_full |
Biophysical Properties of Foamed and Solid Polymers Used in Orthotics and Prosthetics |
title_fullStr |
Biophysical Properties of Foamed and Solid Polymers Used in Orthotics and Prosthetics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biophysical Properties of Foamed and Solid Polymers Used in Orthotics and Prosthetics |
title_sort |
biophysical properties of foamed and solid polymers used in orthotics and prosthetics |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/48898fa837b745e7a18f1e11535eddfb |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT klemenbohinc biophysicalpropertiesoffoamedandsolidpolymersusedinorthoticsandprosthetics AT anzeabram biophysicalpropertiesoffoamedandsolidpolymersusedinorthoticsandprosthetics AT anamarijazore biophysicalpropertiesoffoamedandsolidpolymersusedinorthoticsandprosthetics AT romanstukelj biophysicalpropertiesoffoamedandsolidpolymersusedinorthoticsandprosthetics AT analenarcic biophysicalpropertiesoffoamedandsolidpolymersusedinorthoticsandprosthetics AT rajkovidrih biophysicalpropertiesoffoamedandsolidpolymersusedinorthoticsandprosthetics AT andrijanaseverskapin biophysicalpropertiesoffoamedandsolidpolymersusedinorthoticsandprosthetics |
_version_ |
1718411435037425664 |