An insightful evaluation of professionalism among dentistry students

Purpose: The objective of this study was to explore the ambience of professionalism related to academic integrity among undergraduate dental students. Methodology: “Dundee Polyprofessionalism Inventory I: Academic Integrity” was used to collect responses from first-year to fifth-year dental students...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Syed Rashid Habib, Kamran Sattar, Tauseef Ahmad, Rana M. Barakah, Abdulaziz M. Alshehri, Abdulelah F. Andejani, Abdulrahman A. Almansour
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4892dd53426f452c858ca507ddc1b2bd
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4892dd53426f452c858ca507ddc1b2bd
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4892dd53426f452c858ca507ddc1b2bd2021-11-10T04:18:34ZAn insightful evaluation of professionalism among dentistry students1013-905210.1016/j.sdentj.2020.03.012https://doaj.org/article/4892dd53426f452c858ca507ddc1b2bd2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905220300717https://doaj.org/toc/1013-9052Purpose: The objective of this study was to explore the ambience of professionalism related to academic integrity among undergraduate dental students. Methodology: “Dundee Polyprofessionalism Inventory I: Academic Integrity” was used to collect responses from first-year to fifth-year dental students of the College of Dentistry, King Saud University (Response rate = 78%). The participants’ responses (for 34 professionalism lapses) were recorded by using the Dundee Polyprofessionalism Inventory. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, Chi-square, and T-tests (P < 0.05). Results: The “Ignore” sanction was not opted for any of the 34 professionalism behaviors, and there was unanimous agreement between the participants in considering all 34 behavior statements to be “wrong”. Male and female participants were found to opt for a similar sanction as the median for 16 statements (47%), whereas, for 18 statements (53%), their responses differed with a range of levels 0.5 to 1.5. Preclinical- and clinical-year student responses also showed similarities in their 11 statements (32.3%), and they did differ for 20 statements (58.8%). Interestingly, clinical year respondents were overall on the stricter side of recommending sanctions. Conclusions: For the majority of the dental students tested, there was a good understanding of the significance of some lapses of professionalism associated with academic integrity. Some of the disclosures in this study were substantially appreciable because none of the students selected “ignore” sanction for any of the survey statements. We found that using the Dundee Polyprofessionalism Inventory for learning and understanding academic professionalism among dental students is useful.Syed Rashid HabibKamran SattarTauseef AhmadRana M. BarakahAbdulaziz M. AlshehriAbdulelah F. AndejaniAbdulrahman A. AlmansourElsevierarticleDental studentsProfessionalismDental professionalismLapsesProfessional behaviorAcademic integrityMedicineRDentistryRK1-715ENSaudi Dental Journal, Vol 33, Iss 7, Pp 753-760 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Dental students
Professionalism
Dental professionalism
Lapses
Professional behavior
Academic integrity
Medicine
R
Dentistry
RK1-715
spellingShingle Dental students
Professionalism
Dental professionalism
Lapses
Professional behavior
Academic integrity
Medicine
R
Dentistry
RK1-715
Syed Rashid Habib
Kamran Sattar
Tauseef Ahmad
Rana M. Barakah
Abdulaziz M. Alshehri
Abdulelah F. Andejani
Abdulrahman A. Almansour
An insightful evaluation of professionalism among dentistry students
description Purpose: The objective of this study was to explore the ambience of professionalism related to academic integrity among undergraduate dental students. Methodology: “Dundee Polyprofessionalism Inventory I: Academic Integrity” was used to collect responses from first-year to fifth-year dental students of the College of Dentistry, King Saud University (Response rate = 78%). The participants’ responses (for 34 professionalism lapses) were recorded by using the Dundee Polyprofessionalism Inventory. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, Chi-square, and T-tests (P < 0.05). Results: The “Ignore” sanction was not opted for any of the 34 professionalism behaviors, and there was unanimous agreement between the participants in considering all 34 behavior statements to be “wrong”. Male and female participants were found to opt for a similar sanction as the median for 16 statements (47%), whereas, for 18 statements (53%), their responses differed with a range of levels 0.5 to 1.5. Preclinical- and clinical-year student responses also showed similarities in their 11 statements (32.3%), and they did differ for 20 statements (58.8%). Interestingly, clinical year respondents were overall on the stricter side of recommending sanctions. Conclusions: For the majority of the dental students tested, there was a good understanding of the significance of some lapses of professionalism associated with academic integrity. Some of the disclosures in this study were substantially appreciable because none of the students selected “ignore” sanction for any of the survey statements. We found that using the Dundee Polyprofessionalism Inventory for learning and understanding academic professionalism among dental students is useful.
format article
author Syed Rashid Habib
Kamran Sattar
Tauseef Ahmad
Rana M. Barakah
Abdulaziz M. Alshehri
Abdulelah F. Andejani
Abdulrahman A. Almansour
author_facet Syed Rashid Habib
Kamran Sattar
Tauseef Ahmad
Rana M. Barakah
Abdulaziz M. Alshehri
Abdulelah F. Andejani
Abdulrahman A. Almansour
author_sort Syed Rashid Habib
title An insightful evaluation of professionalism among dentistry students
title_short An insightful evaluation of professionalism among dentistry students
title_full An insightful evaluation of professionalism among dentistry students
title_fullStr An insightful evaluation of professionalism among dentistry students
title_full_unstemmed An insightful evaluation of professionalism among dentistry students
title_sort insightful evaluation of professionalism among dentistry students
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/4892dd53426f452c858ca507ddc1b2bd
work_keys_str_mv AT syedrashidhabib aninsightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents
AT kamransattar aninsightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents
AT tauseefahmad aninsightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents
AT ranambarakah aninsightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents
AT abdulazizmalshehri aninsightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents
AT abdulelahfandejani aninsightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents
AT abdulrahmanaalmansour aninsightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents
AT syedrashidhabib insightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents
AT kamransattar insightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents
AT tauseefahmad insightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents
AT ranambarakah insightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents
AT abdulazizmalshehri insightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents
AT abdulelahfandejani insightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents
AT abdulrahmanaalmansour insightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents
_version_ 1718440643808722944