An insightful evaluation of professionalism among dentistry students
Purpose: The objective of this study was to explore the ambience of professionalism related to academic integrity among undergraduate dental students. Methodology: “Dundee Polyprofessionalism Inventory I: Academic Integrity” was used to collect responses from first-year to fifth-year dental students...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/4892dd53426f452c858ca507ddc1b2bd |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:4892dd53426f452c858ca507ddc1b2bd |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:4892dd53426f452c858ca507ddc1b2bd2021-11-10T04:18:34ZAn insightful evaluation of professionalism among dentistry students1013-905210.1016/j.sdentj.2020.03.012https://doaj.org/article/4892dd53426f452c858ca507ddc1b2bd2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905220300717https://doaj.org/toc/1013-9052Purpose: The objective of this study was to explore the ambience of professionalism related to academic integrity among undergraduate dental students. Methodology: “Dundee Polyprofessionalism Inventory I: Academic Integrity” was used to collect responses from first-year to fifth-year dental students of the College of Dentistry, King Saud University (Response rate = 78%). The participants’ responses (for 34 professionalism lapses) were recorded by using the Dundee Polyprofessionalism Inventory. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, Chi-square, and T-tests (P < 0.05). Results: The “Ignore” sanction was not opted for any of the 34 professionalism behaviors, and there was unanimous agreement between the participants in considering all 34 behavior statements to be “wrong”. Male and female participants were found to opt for a similar sanction as the median for 16 statements (47%), whereas, for 18 statements (53%), their responses differed with a range of levels 0.5 to 1.5. Preclinical- and clinical-year student responses also showed similarities in their 11 statements (32.3%), and they did differ for 20 statements (58.8%). Interestingly, clinical year respondents were overall on the stricter side of recommending sanctions. Conclusions: For the majority of the dental students tested, there was a good understanding of the significance of some lapses of professionalism associated with academic integrity. Some of the disclosures in this study were substantially appreciable because none of the students selected “ignore” sanction for any of the survey statements. We found that using the Dundee Polyprofessionalism Inventory for learning and understanding academic professionalism among dental students is useful.Syed Rashid HabibKamran SattarTauseef AhmadRana M. BarakahAbdulaziz M. AlshehriAbdulelah F. AndejaniAbdulrahman A. AlmansourElsevierarticleDental studentsProfessionalismDental professionalismLapsesProfessional behaviorAcademic integrityMedicineRDentistryRK1-715ENSaudi Dental Journal, Vol 33, Iss 7, Pp 753-760 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Dental students Professionalism Dental professionalism Lapses Professional behavior Academic integrity Medicine R Dentistry RK1-715 |
spellingShingle |
Dental students Professionalism Dental professionalism Lapses Professional behavior Academic integrity Medicine R Dentistry RK1-715 Syed Rashid Habib Kamran Sattar Tauseef Ahmad Rana M. Barakah Abdulaziz M. Alshehri Abdulelah F. Andejani Abdulrahman A. Almansour An insightful evaluation of professionalism among dentistry students |
description |
Purpose: The objective of this study was to explore the ambience of professionalism related to academic integrity among undergraduate dental students. Methodology: “Dundee Polyprofessionalism Inventory I: Academic Integrity” was used to collect responses from first-year to fifth-year dental students of the College of Dentistry, King Saud University (Response rate = 78%). The participants’ responses (for 34 professionalism lapses) were recorded by using the Dundee Polyprofessionalism Inventory. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, Chi-square, and T-tests (P < 0.05). Results: The “Ignore” sanction was not opted for any of the 34 professionalism behaviors, and there was unanimous agreement between the participants in considering all 34 behavior statements to be “wrong”. Male and female participants were found to opt for a similar sanction as the median for 16 statements (47%), whereas, for 18 statements (53%), their responses differed with a range of levels 0.5 to 1.5. Preclinical- and clinical-year student responses also showed similarities in their 11 statements (32.3%), and they did differ for 20 statements (58.8%). Interestingly, clinical year respondents were overall on the stricter side of recommending sanctions. Conclusions: For the majority of the dental students tested, there was a good understanding of the significance of some lapses of professionalism associated with academic integrity. Some of the disclosures in this study were substantially appreciable because none of the students selected “ignore” sanction for any of the survey statements. We found that using the Dundee Polyprofessionalism Inventory for learning and understanding academic professionalism among dental students is useful. |
format |
article |
author |
Syed Rashid Habib Kamran Sattar Tauseef Ahmad Rana M. Barakah Abdulaziz M. Alshehri Abdulelah F. Andejani Abdulrahman A. Almansour |
author_facet |
Syed Rashid Habib Kamran Sattar Tauseef Ahmad Rana M. Barakah Abdulaziz M. Alshehri Abdulelah F. Andejani Abdulrahman A. Almansour |
author_sort |
Syed Rashid Habib |
title |
An insightful evaluation of professionalism among dentistry students |
title_short |
An insightful evaluation of professionalism among dentistry students |
title_full |
An insightful evaluation of professionalism among dentistry students |
title_fullStr |
An insightful evaluation of professionalism among dentistry students |
title_full_unstemmed |
An insightful evaluation of professionalism among dentistry students |
title_sort |
insightful evaluation of professionalism among dentistry students |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/4892dd53426f452c858ca507ddc1b2bd |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT syedrashidhabib aninsightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents AT kamransattar aninsightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents AT tauseefahmad aninsightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents AT ranambarakah aninsightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents AT abdulazizmalshehri aninsightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents AT abdulelahfandejani aninsightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents AT abdulrahmanaalmansour aninsightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents AT syedrashidhabib insightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents AT kamransattar insightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents AT tauseefahmad insightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents AT ranambarakah insightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents AT abdulazizmalshehri insightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents AT abdulelahfandejani insightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents AT abdulrahmanaalmansour insightfulevaluationofprofessionalismamongdentistrystudents |
_version_ |
1718440643808722944 |