A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types

Instructional designers and educators recognize the potential of mobile technologies as a learning tool for students and have incorporated them into the distance learning environment. However, little research has been done to categorize the numerous examples of mobile learning in the context of dist...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Yeonjeong Park
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Athabasca University Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/48acc1aaedd24350a9b336d6145b9a13
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:48acc1aaedd24350a9b336d6145b9a13
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:48acc1aaedd24350a9b336d6145b9a132021-12-02T17:16:18ZA pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types10.19173/irrodl.v12i2.7911492-3831https://doaj.org/article/48acc1aaedd24350a9b336d6145b9a132011-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/791https://doaj.org/toc/1492-3831Instructional designers and educators recognize the potential of mobile technologies as a learning tool for students and have incorporated them into the distance learning environment. However, little research has been done to categorize the numerous examples of mobile learning in the context of distance education, and few instructional design guidelines based on a solid theoretical framework for mobile learning exist. In this paper I compare mobile learning (m-learning) with electronic learning (e-learning) and ubiquitous learning (u-learning) and describe the technological attributes and pedagogical affordances of mobile learning presented in previous studies. I modify transactional distance (TD) theory and adopt it as a relevant theoretical framework for mobile learning in distance education. Furthermore, I attempt to position previous studies into four types of mobile learning: 1) high transactional distance socialized m-learning, 2) high transactional distance individualized m-learning, 3) low transactional distance socialized m-learning, and 4) low transactional distance individualized m-learning. As a result, this paper can be used by instructional designers of open and distance learning to learn about the concepts of mobile learning and how mobile technologies can be incorporated into their teaching and learning more effectively.Yeonjeong ParkAthabasca University Pressarticlee-learningm-learningu-learningfour types of mobile learningdistance learningtransactional distance theorySpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691ENInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol 12, Iss 2 (2011)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic e-learning
m-learning
u-learning
four types of mobile learning
distance learning
transactional distance theory
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
spellingShingle e-learning
m-learning
u-learning
four types of mobile learning
distance learning
transactional distance theory
Special aspects of education
LC8-6691
Yeonjeong Park
A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types
description Instructional designers and educators recognize the potential of mobile technologies as a learning tool for students and have incorporated them into the distance learning environment. However, little research has been done to categorize the numerous examples of mobile learning in the context of distance education, and few instructional design guidelines based on a solid theoretical framework for mobile learning exist. In this paper I compare mobile learning (m-learning) with electronic learning (e-learning) and ubiquitous learning (u-learning) and describe the technological attributes and pedagogical affordances of mobile learning presented in previous studies. I modify transactional distance (TD) theory and adopt it as a relevant theoretical framework for mobile learning in distance education. Furthermore, I attempt to position previous studies into four types of mobile learning: 1) high transactional distance socialized m-learning, 2) high transactional distance individualized m-learning, 3) low transactional distance socialized m-learning, and 4) low transactional distance individualized m-learning. As a result, this paper can be used by instructional designers of open and distance learning to learn about the concepts of mobile learning and how mobile technologies can be incorporated into their teaching and learning more effectively.
format article
author Yeonjeong Park
author_facet Yeonjeong Park
author_sort Yeonjeong Park
title A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types
title_short A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types
title_full A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types
title_fullStr A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types
title_full_unstemmed A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types
title_sort pedagogical framework for mobile learning: categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types
publisher Athabasca University Press
publishDate 2011
url https://doaj.org/article/48acc1aaedd24350a9b336d6145b9a13
work_keys_str_mv AT yeonjeongpark apedagogicalframeworkformobilelearningcategorizingeducationalapplicationsofmobiletechnologiesintofourtypes
AT yeonjeongpark pedagogicalframeworkformobilelearningcategorizingeducationalapplicationsofmobiletechnologiesintofourtypes
_version_ 1718381142950805504