A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types
Instructional designers and educators recognize the potential of mobile technologies as a learning tool for students and have incorporated them into the distance learning environment. However, little research has been done to categorize the numerous examples of mobile learning in the context of dist...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Athabasca University Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/48acc1aaedd24350a9b336d6145b9a13 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:48acc1aaedd24350a9b336d6145b9a13 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:48acc1aaedd24350a9b336d6145b9a132021-12-02T17:16:18ZA pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types10.19173/irrodl.v12i2.7911492-3831https://doaj.org/article/48acc1aaedd24350a9b336d6145b9a132011-02-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/791https://doaj.org/toc/1492-3831Instructional designers and educators recognize the potential of mobile technologies as a learning tool for students and have incorporated them into the distance learning environment. However, little research has been done to categorize the numerous examples of mobile learning in the context of distance education, and few instructional design guidelines based on a solid theoretical framework for mobile learning exist. In this paper I compare mobile learning (m-learning) with electronic learning (e-learning) and ubiquitous learning (u-learning) and describe the technological attributes and pedagogical affordances of mobile learning presented in previous studies. I modify transactional distance (TD) theory and adopt it as a relevant theoretical framework for mobile learning in distance education. Furthermore, I attempt to position previous studies into four types of mobile learning: 1) high transactional distance socialized m-learning, 2) high transactional distance individualized m-learning, 3) low transactional distance socialized m-learning, and 4) low transactional distance individualized m-learning. As a result, this paper can be used by instructional designers of open and distance learning to learn about the concepts of mobile learning and how mobile technologies can be incorporated into their teaching and learning more effectively.Yeonjeong ParkAthabasca University Pressarticlee-learningm-learningu-learningfour types of mobile learningdistance learningtransactional distance theorySpecial aspects of educationLC8-6691ENInternational Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, Vol 12, Iss 2 (2011) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
e-learning m-learning u-learning four types of mobile learning distance learning transactional distance theory Special aspects of education LC8-6691 |
spellingShingle |
e-learning m-learning u-learning four types of mobile learning distance learning transactional distance theory Special aspects of education LC8-6691 Yeonjeong Park A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types |
description |
Instructional designers and educators recognize the potential of mobile technologies as a learning tool for students and have incorporated them into the distance learning environment. However, little research has been done to categorize the numerous examples of mobile learning in the context of distance education, and few instructional design guidelines based on a solid theoretical framework for mobile learning exist. In this paper I compare mobile learning (m-learning) with electronic learning (e-learning) and ubiquitous learning (u-learning) and describe the technological attributes and pedagogical affordances of mobile learning presented in previous studies. I modify transactional distance (TD) theory and adopt it as a relevant theoretical framework for mobile learning in distance education. Furthermore, I attempt to position previous studies into four types of mobile learning: 1) high transactional distance socialized m-learning, 2) high transactional distance individualized m-learning, 3) low transactional distance socialized m-learning, and 4) low transactional distance individualized m-learning. As a result, this paper can be used by instructional designers of open and distance learning to learn about the concepts of mobile learning and how mobile technologies can be incorporated into their teaching and learning more effectively. |
format |
article |
author |
Yeonjeong Park |
author_facet |
Yeonjeong Park |
author_sort |
Yeonjeong Park |
title |
A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types |
title_short |
A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types |
title_full |
A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types |
title_fullStr |
A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types |
title_full_unstemmed |
A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types |
title_sort |
pedagogical framework for mobile learning: categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types |
publisher |
Athabasca University Press |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/48acc1aaedd24350a9b336d6145b9a13 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yeonjeongpark apedagogicalframeworkformobilelearningcategorizingeducationalapplicationsofmobiletechnologiesintofourtypes AT yeonjeongpark pedagogicalframeworkformobilelearningcategorizingeducationalapplicationsofmobiletechnologiesintofourtypes |
_version_ |
1718381142950805504 |