Comparative analysis of cardiac mechano-energetics in isolated hearts supported by pulsatile or rotary blood pumps

Abstract The previously more frequently implanted pulsatile blood pumps (PBPs) showed higher recovery rates than the currently preferred rotary blood pumps (RBPs), with unclear causality. The aim of this study was to comparatively assess the capability of PBPs and RPBs to unload the left ventricle a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marcus Granegger, Young Choi, Benedikt Locher, Philipp Aigner, Emanuel J. Hubmann, Frithjof Lemme, Nikola Cesarovic, Michael Hübler, Martin Schweiger
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2019
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/48c49f4403f747b1ab11cf52f7e58a59
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:48c49f4403f747b1ab11cf52f7e58a59
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:48c49f4403f747b1ab11cf52f7e58a592021-12-02T13:35:11ZComparative analysis of cardiac mechano-energetics in isolated hearts supported by pulsatile or rotary blood pumps10.1038/s41598-019-56344-82045-2322https://doaj.org/article/48c49f4403f747b1ab11cf52f7e58a592019-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56344-8https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The previously more frequently implanted pulsatile blood pumps (PBPs) showed higher recovery rates than the currently preferred rotary blood pumps (RBPs), with unclear causality. The aim of this study was to comparatively assess the capability of PBPs and RPBs to unload the left ventricle and maintain cardiac energetics as a possible implication for recovery. An RBP and a heartbeat synchronized PBP were alternately connected to isolated porcine hearts. Rotational speed of RBPs was set to different support levels. For PBP support, the start of ejection was phased to different points during the cardiac cycle, prescribed as percentage delays from 0% to 90%. Cardiac efficiency, quantified by the ratio of external work over myocardial oxygen consumption, was determined. For RBP support, higher degrees of RBP support correlated with lower left atrial pressures (LAP) and lower cardiac efficiency (r = 0.91 ± 0.12). In contrast, depending on the phase delay of a PBP, LAP and cardiac efficiency exhibited a sinusoidal relationship with the LAP minimum at 90% and efficiency maximum at 60%. Phasing of a PBP offers the possibility to maintain a high cardiac efficiency and simultaneously unload the ventricle. These results warrant future studies investigating whether optimized cardiac energetics promotes functional recovery with LVAD therapy.Marcus GraneggerYoung ChoiBenedikt LocherPhilipp AignerEmanuel J. HubmannFrithjof LemmeNikola CesarovicMichael HüblerMartin SchweigerNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Marcus Granegger
Young Choi
Benedikt Locher
Philipp Aigner
Emanuel J. Hubmann
Frithjof Lemme
Nikola Cesarovic
Michael Hübler
Martin Schweiger
Comparative analysis of cardiac mechano-energetics in isolated hearts supported by pulsatile or rotary blood pumps
description Abstract The previously more frequently implanted pulsatile blood pumps (PBPs) showed higher recovery rates than the currently preferred rotary blood pumps (RBPs), with unclear causality. The aim of this study was to comparatively assess the capability of PBPs and RPBs to unload the left ventricle and maintain cardiac energetics as a possible implication for recovery. An RBP and a heartbeat synchronized PBP were alternately connected to isolated porcine hearts. Rotational speed of RBPs was set to different support levels. For PBP support, the start of ejection was phased to different points during the cardiac cycle, prescribed as percentage delays from 0% to 90%. Cardiac efficiency, quantified by the ratio of external work over myocardial oxygen consumption, was determined. For RBP support, higher degrees of RBP support correlated with lower left atrial pressures (LAP) and lower cardiac efficiency (r = 0.91 ± 0.12). In contrast, depending on the phase delay of a PBP, LAP and cardiac efficiency exhibited a sinusoidal relationship with the LAP minimum at 90% and efficiency maximum at 60%. Phasing of a PBP offers the possibility to maintain a high cardiac efficiency and simultaneously unload the ventricle. These results warrant future studies investigating whether optimized cardiac energetics promotes functional recovery with LVAD therapy.
format article
author Marcus Granegger
Young Choi
Benedikt Locher
Philipp Aigner
Emanuel J. Hubmann
Frithjof Lemme
Nikola Cesarovic
Michael Hübler
Martin Schweiger
author_facet Marcus Granegger
Young Choi
Benedikt Locher
Philipp Aigner
Emanuel J. Hubmann
Frithjof Lemme
Nikola Cesarovic
Michael Hübler
Martin Schweiger
author_sort Marcus Granegger
title Comparative analysis of cardiac mechano-energetics in isolated hearts supported by pulsatile or rotary blood pumps
title_short Comparative analysis of cardiac mechano-energetics in isolated hearts supported by pulsatile or rotary blood pumps
title_full Comparative analysis of cardiac mechano-energetics in isolated hearts supported by pulsatile or rotary blood pumps
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of cardiac mechano-energetics in isolated hearts supported by pulsatile or rotary blood pumps
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of cardiac mechano-energetics in isolated hearts supported by pulsatile or rotary blood pumps
title_sort comparative analysis of cardiac mechano-energetics in isolated hearts supported by pulsatile or rotary blood pumps
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/48c49f4403f747b1ab11cf52f7e58a59
work_keys_str_mv AT marcusgranegger comparativeanalysisofcardiacmechanoenergeticsinisolatedheartssupportedbypulsatileorrotarybloodpumps
AT youngchoi comparativeanalysisofcardiacmechanoenergeticsinisolatedheartssupportedbypulsatileorrotarybloodpumps
AT benediktlocher comparativeanalysisofcardiacmechanoenergeticsinisolatedheartssupportedbypulsatileorrotarybloodpumps
AT philippaigner comparativeanalysisofcardiacmechanoenergeticsinisolatedheartssupportedbypulsatileorrotarybloodpumps
AT emanueljhubmann comparativeanalysisofcardiacmechanoenergeticsinisolatedheartssupportedbypulsatileorrotarybloodpumps
AT frithjoflemme comparativeanalysisofcardiacmechanoenergeticsinisolatedheartssupportedbypulsatileorrotarybloodpumps
AT nikolacesarovic comparativeanalysisofcardiacmechanoenergeticsinisolatedheartssupportedbypulsatileorrotarybloodpumps
AT michaelhubler comparativeanalysisofcardiacmechanoenergeticsinisolatedheartssupportedbypulsatileorrotarybloodpumps
AT martinschweiger comparativeanalysisofcardiacmechanoenergeticsinisolatedheartssupportedbypulsatileorrotarybloodpumps
_version_ 1718392670847500288