Uncertainty in experts’ judgments exposes the vulnerability of research reporting anecdotes on animals’ cognitive abilities
Abstract Expertise in science, particularly in animal behaviour, may provide people with the capacity to provide better judgments in contrast to lay people. Here we explore whether experts provide a more objective, accurate and coherent evaluation of a recently reported anecdote on Atlantic puffin (...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Krisztina Sándor, Balázs Könnyű, Ádám Miklósi |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/48d6727db9464d16be180cfdf50d2483 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Author Correction: Uncertainty in experts’ judgments exposes the vulnerability of research reporting anecdotes on animals’ cognitive abilities
por: Krisztina Sándor, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
“Genuine Anecdotes about Peter the Great” by J. Shtelin (at the Origins of Historical Anecdote Genre in Russia)
por: P. A. Krotov
Publicado: (2021) -
THE EXPERT-ACCOUNTANT’S PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT IN THE ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS
por: Ekaterina Igorevna Erokhina, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Judgments of physics problem difficulty among experts and novices
por: Witat Fakcharoenphol, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
When animals cry: The effect of adding tears to animal expressions on human judgment.
por: Alfonso Picó, et al.
Publicado: (2021)