Uncertainty in experts’ judgments exposes the vulnerability of research reporting anecdotes on animals’ cognitive abilities
Abstract Expertise in science, particularly in animal behaviour, may provide people with the capacity to provide better judgments in contrast to lay people. Here we explore whether experts provide a more objective, accurate and coherent evaluation of a recently reported anecdote on Atlantic puffin (...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Krisztina Sándor, Balázs Könnyű, Ádám Miklósi |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Language: | EN |
Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doaj.org/article/48d6727db9464d16be180cfdf50d2483 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Author Correction: Uncertainty in experts’ judgments exposes the vulnerability of research reporting anecdotes on animals’ cognitive abilities
by: Krisztina Sándor, et al.
Published: (2021) -
“Genuine Anecdotes about Peter the Great” by J. Shtelin (at the Origins of Historical Anecdote Genre in Russia)
by: P. A. Krotov
Published: (2021) -
THE EXPERT-ACCOUNTANT’S PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT IN THE ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS
by: Ekaterina Igorevna Erokhina, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Judgments of physics problem difficulty among experts and novices
by: Witat Fakcharoenphol, et al.
Published: (2015) -
When animals cry: The effect of adding tears to animal expressions on human judgment.
by: Alfonso Picó, et al.
Published: (2021)