Uncertainty in experts’ judgments exposes the vulnerability of research reporting anecdotes on animals’ cognitive abilities
Abstract Expertise in science, particularly in animal behaviour, may provide people with the capacity to provide better judgments in contrast to lay people. Here we explore whether experts provide a more objective, accurate and coherent evaluation of a recently reported anecdote on Atlantic puffin (...
Enregistré dans:
Auteurs principaux: | Krisztina Sándor, Balázs Könnyű, Ádám Miklósi |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | EN |
Publié: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/48d6727db9464d16be180cfdf50d2483 |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
Author Correction: Uncertainty in experts’ judgments exposes the vulnerability of research reporting anecdotes on animals’ cognitive abilities
par: Krisztina Sándor, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
“Genuine Anecdotes about Peter the Great” by J. Shtelin (at the Origins of Historical Anecdote Genre in Russia)
par: P. A. Krotov
Publié: (2021) -
THE EXPERT-ACCOUNTANT’S PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT IN THE ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS
par: Ekaterina Igorevna Erokhina, et autres
Publié: (2020) -
Judgments of physics problem difficulty among experts and novices
par: Witat Fakcharoenphol, et autres
Publié: (2015) -
When animals cry: The effect of adding tears to animal expressions on human judgment.
par: Alfonso Picó, et autres
Publié: (2021)