Who guards the guardians?
The United Kingdom’s Leveson Inquiry has been the hottest free show in town since it began taking evidence in November 2011 until the first phase of the Inquiry concluded on 24 July 2012. During that time, the general public has been exposed to a tsunami of information from the great and the good in...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Asia Pacific Network
2012
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/48fe4e6181ce4afebc9754a9058fc735 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:48fe4e6181ce4afebc9754a9058fc735 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:48fe4e6181ce4afebc9754a9058fc7352021-12-02T10:15:25ZWho guards the guardians?10.24135/pjr.v18i2.2591023-94992324-2035https://doaj.org/article/48fe4e6181ce4afebc9754a9058fc7352012-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://ojs.aut.ac.nz/pacific-journalism-review/article/view/259https://doaj.org/toc/1023-9499https://doaj.org/toc/2324-2035The United Kingdom’s Leveson Inquiry has been the hottest free show in town since it began taking evidence in November 2011 until the first phase of the Inquiry concluded on 24 July 2012. During that time, the general public has been exposed to a tsunami of information from the great and the good in Britain, which raised questions not only about journalism practices and ethics but the separation of powers and the rule of law. The importance to any democracy of an independent judiciary cannot be overestimated. Sir Brian Leveson began the inquiry by posing the question: Who guards the guardians? He stressed that the concept of the freedom of the press was a fundamental part of any democracy and that he had no desire to stifle freedom of speech in Britain. This article reflects on missed opportunities and considers the future for press regulation in Britain. It also makes the point that irrespective of whatever new regime is established, it is time for proprietors, editors and journalists to stand up for responsible, public interest journalism and only then will there be an outside chance that the public’s faith in mainstream journalism will be restored.Duncan BloyAsia Pacific NetworkarticleAccountabilityBritainDemocracyFreedom of expressionFreedom of speechLeveson InquiryCommunication. Mass mediaP87-96Journalism. The periodical press, etc.PN4699-5650ENPacific Journalism Review, Vol 18, Iss 2 (2012) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
Accountability Britain Democracy Freedom of expression Freedom of speech Leveson Inquiry Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650 |
| spellingShingle |
Accountability Britain Democracy Freedom of expression Freedom of speech Leveson Inquiry Communication. Mass media P87-96 Journalism. The periodical press, etc. PN4699-5650 Duncan Bloy Who guards the guardians? |
| description |
The United Kingdom’s Leveson Inquiry has been the hottest free show in town since it began taking evidence in November 2011 until the first phase of the Inquiry concluded on 24 July 2012. During that time, the general public has been exposed to a tsunami of information from the great and the good in Britain, which raised questions not only about journalism practices and ethics but the separation of powers and the rule of law. The importance to any democracy of an independent judiciary cannot be overestimated. Sir Brian Leveson began the inquiry by posing the question: Who guards the guardians? He stressed that the concept of the freedom of the press was a fundamental part of any democracy and that he had no desire to stifle freedom of speech in Britain. This article reflects on missed opportunities and considers the future for press regulation in Britain. It also makes the point that irrespective of whatever new regime is established, it is time for proprietors, editors and journalists to stand up for responsible, public interest journalism and only then will there be an outside chance that the public’s faith in mainstream journalism will be restored. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Duncan Bloy |
| author_facet |
Duncan Bloy |
| author_sort |
Duncan Bloy |
| title |
Who guards the guardians? |
| title_short |
Who guards the guardians? |
| title_full |
Who guards the guardians? |
| title_fullStr |
Who guards the guardians? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Who guards the guardians? |
| title_sort |
who guards the guardians? |
| publisher |
Asia Pacific Network |
| publishDate |
2012 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/48fe4e6181ce4afebc9754a9058fc735 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT duncanbloy whoguardstheguardians |
| _version_ |
1718397458731499520 |