Depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes implanted with different type of presbyopia-correcting IOLS

Abstract To evaluate depth of field (DOF) provided by different presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens (IOL) designs, comparing the results obtained using different criteria for defining the defocus tolerance. A total of 150 eyes undergoing cataract surgery were enrolled and divided into 6 groups de...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Carlos Palomino-Bautista, Rubén Sánchez-Jean, David Carmona-Gonzalez, David P. Piñero, Ainhoa Molina-Martín
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/492cf1468b9741069b6900c8a1a009eb
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:492cf1468b9741069b6900c8a1a009eb
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:492cf1468b9741069b6900c8a1a009eb2021-12-02T14:58:14ZDepth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes implanted with different type of presbyopia-correcting IOLS10.1038/s41598-021-91654-w2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/492cf1468b9741069b6900c8a1a009eb2021-06-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91654-whttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract To evaluate depth of field (DOF) provided by different presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens (IOL) designs, comparing the results obtained using different criteria for defining the defocus tolerance. A total of 150 eyes undergoing cataract surgery were enrolled and divided into 6 groups depending on the IOL implanted: AT.LISA Tri (Carl Zeiss Meditec), FineVision (PhysIOL), PanOptix (Alcon Laboratories), Tecnis Symfony (Johnson & Johnson Vision), Miniwell (SIFI MedTech) and Tecnis Synergy (Johnson & Johnson Vision). Subjective DOF was obtained from defocus curves with absolute and relative criteria of tolerance of 0.1 logMAR. Aberrometry was also measured and the visual strehl optical transference function (VSOTF) with percentage of degradation of 90%, 80% and 60% was used to quantify objectively the DOF. Tecnis Symfony, Tecnis Synergy and Panoptix IOL groups showed better subjective and objective DOF compared to the rest of IOL groups, being these differences statistically significant differences (p < 0.001). Comparison between subjective and objective DOF showed that subjective measures were higher for all IOLs, being also these differences statistically significant for all groups (p < 0.001). A moderate significant correlation was found between absolute subjective criteria and VSOTF60% (r = 0.73, p < 0.05). Objective and subjective measures of DOF are not comparable due to differences in methodologies and criterions to define the level of degradation tolerance. Nevertheless, both objective and subjective measures showed a trend to a greater DOF for Tecnis Symfony and Tecnis Synergy IOLs compared to most of trifocal diffractive designs, with the exception of PanOptix.Carlos Palomino-BautistaRubén Sánchez-JeanDavid Carmona-GonzalezDavid P. PiñeroAinhoa Molina-MartínNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Carlos Palomino-Bautista Rubén Sánchez-Jean David Carmona-Gonzalez David P. Piñero Ainhoa Molina-Martín Depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes implanted with different type of presbyopia-correcting IOLS
description	Abstract To evaluate depth of field (DOF) provided by different presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens (IOL) designs, comparing the results obtained using different criteria for defining the defocus tolerance. A total of 150 eyes undergoing cataract surgery were enrolled and divided into 6 groups depending on the IOL implanted: AT.LISA Tri (Carl Zeiss Meditec), FineVision (PhysIOL), PanOptix (Alcon Laboratories), Tecnis Symfony (Johnson & Johnson Vision), Miniwell (SIFI MedTech) and Tecnis Synergy (Johnson & Johnson Vision). Subjective DOF was obtained from defocus curves with absolute and relative criteria of tolerance of 0.1 logMAR. Aberrometry was also measured and the visual strehl optical transference function (VSOTF) with percentage of degradation of 90%, 80% and 60% was used to quantify objectively the DOF. Tecnis Symfony, Tecnis Synergy and Panoptix IOL groups showed better subjective and objective DOF compared to the rest of IOL groups, being these differences statistically significant differences (p < 0.001). Comparison between subjective and objective DOF showed that subjective measures were higher for all IOLs, being also these differences statistically significant for all groups (p < 0.001). A moderate significant correlation was found between absolute subjective criteria and VSOTF60% (r = 0.73, p < 0.05). Objective and subjective measures of DOF are not comparable due to differences in methodologies and criterions to define the level of degradation tolerance. Nevertheless, both objective and subjective measures showed a trend to a greater DOF for Tecnis Symfony and Tecnis Synergy IOLs compared to most of trifocal diffractive designs, with the exception of PanOptix.
format	article
author	Carlos Palomino-Bautista Rubén Sánchez-Jean David Carmona-Gonzalez David P. Piñero Ainhoa Molina-Martín
author_facet	Carlos Palomino-Bautista Rubén Sánchez-Jean David Carmona-Gonzalez David P. Piñero Ainhoa Molina-Martín
author_sort	Carlos Palomino-Bautista
title	Depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes implanted with different type of presbyopia-correcting IOLS
title_short	Depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes implanted with different type of presbyopia-correcting IOLS
title_full	Depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes implanted with different type of presbyopia-correcting IOLS
title_fullStr	Depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes implanted with different type of presbyopia-correcting IOLS
title_full_unstemmed	Depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes implanted with different type of presbyopia-correcting IOLS
title_sort	depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes implanted with different type of presbyopia-correcting iols
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/492cf1468b9741069b6900c8a1a009eb
work_keys_str_mv	AT carlospalominobautista depthoffieldmeasuresinpseudophakiceyesimplantedwithdifferenttypeofpresbyopiacorrectingiols AT rubensanchezjean depthoffieldmeasuresinpseudophakiceyesimplantedwithdifferenttypeofpresbyopiacorrectingiols AT davidcarmonagonzalez depthoffieldmeasuresinpseudophakiceyesimplantedwithdifferenttypeofpresbyopiacorrectingiols AT davidppinero depthoffieldmeasuresinpseudophakiceyesimplantedwithdifferenttypeofpresbyopiacorrectingiols AT ainhoamolinamartin depthoffieldmeasuresinpseudophakiceyesimplantedwithdifferenttypeofpresbyopiacorrectingiols
_version_	1718389323206754304

Depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes implanted with different type of presbyopia-correcting IOLS

Ejemplares similares