Minimal invasive surgery for multiple adhesive small bowel obstruction: Results of a comparative multicenter study

Aim of the study: Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in small bowel obstruction (SBO) is getting increasingly normal. In patients with multiple adhesive SBOs (MASBO), laparoscopic approaches might increase the risk of bowel injury due to the distended and potentially compromised small bowel. It remains a cha...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daniel Gómez, Luis F. Cabrera-Vargas, Mauricio Pedraza, Andres Mendoza, Jean A. Pulido-Segura, Ricardo Villarreal-Viana, Andres Urrutia, Sebastian Sanchez-Ussa, Salomone Di Saverio
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
ES
Publicado: Permanyer 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/494be13c0fbe49d09a46cd756bf8713e
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:494be13c0fbe49d09a46cd756bf8713e
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:494be13c0fbe49d09a46cd756bf8713e2021-12-01T20:20:04ZMinimal invasive surgery for multiple adhesive small bowel obstruction: Results of a comparative multicenter study10.24875/CIRU.200008952444-054Xhttps://doaj.org/article/494be13c0fbe49d09a46cd756bf8713e2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.cirugiaycirujanos.com/frame_esp.php?id=572https://doaj.org/toc/2444-054XAim of the study: Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in small bowel obstruction (SBO) is getting increasingly normal. In patients with multiple adhesive SBOs (MASBO), laparoscopic approaches might increase the risk of bowel injury due to the distended and potentially compromised small bowel. It remains a challenge to the surgeons, entails an interdisciplinary team, trying to achieve the least complications as possible. The study aimed to compare surgical outcomes of laparoscopic procedures (multi-port vs. single-port) in the management of MASBO. Patients and Methods: Comparative study of 68 patients with post-operative MASBO treated with Single-Port single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and Multi-port Laparoscopic Surgery in two centers of Bogota, Colombia between January 2013 and June 2018. Results: All patients underwent laparoscopic management, 27 patients by SILS, and 41 patients by multi-port. The average surgical time in the multiport approach was 167 min versus SILS with 129 min. Laparoscopic intestinal resection was performed in 4.4% of patients, through multi-port using intracorporeal anastomosis. Mean hospital stay of 3.2 days for the SILS approach versus multi-port in 2.2 days. Conclusions: Both laparoscopic approaches, in MASBO treatment is feasible in qualified hands. Patient selection and medical judgment seem to be the most essential factors for a positive result. Daniel GómezLuis F. Cabrera-VargasMauricio PedrazaAndres MendozaJean A. Pulido-SeguraRicardo Villarreal-VianaAndres UrrutiaSebastian Sanchez-UssaSalomone Di SaverioPermanyerarticleHand-assisted laparoscopy. Intestinal obstruction. Laparoscopy. Surgery. Tissue adhesions.SurgeryRD1-811ENESCirugía y Cirujanos, Vol 89, Iss 6 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
ES
topic Hand-assisted laparoscopy. Intestinal obstruction. Laparoscopy. Surgery. Tissue adhesions.
Surgery
RD1-811
spellingShingle Hand-assisted laparoscopy. Intestinal obstruction. Laparoscopy. Surgery. Tissue adhesions.
Surgery
RD1-811
Daniel Gómez
Luis F. Cabrera-Vargas
Mauricio Pedraza
Andres Mendoza
Jean A. Pulido-Segura
Ricardo Villarreal-Viana
Andres Urrutia
Sebastian Sanchez-Ussa
Salomone Di Saverio
Minimal invasive surgery for multiple adhesive small bowel obstruction: Results of a comparative multicenter study
description Aim of the study: Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in small bowel obstruction (SBO) is getting increasingly normal. In patients with multiple adhesive SBOs (MASBO), laparoscopic approaches might increase the risk of bowel injury due to the distended and potentially compromised small bowel. It remains a challenge to the surgeons, entails an interdisciplinary team, trying to achieve the least complications as possible. The study aimed to compare surgical outcomes of laparoscopic procedures (multi-port vs. single-port) in the management of MASBO. Patients and Methods: Comparative study of 68 patients with post-operative MASBO treated with Single-Port single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and Multi-port Laparoscopic Surgery in two centers of Bogota, Colombia between January 2013 and June 2018. Results: All patients underwent laparoscopic management, 27 patients by SILS, and 41 patients by multi-port. The average surgical time in the multiport approach was 167 min versus SILS with 129 min. Laparoscopic intestinal resection was performed in 4.4% of patients, through multi-port using intracorporeal anastomosis. Mean hospital stay of 3.2 days for the SILS approach versus multi-port in 2.2 days. Conclusions: Both laparoscopic approaches, in MASBO treatment is feasible in qualified hands. Patient selection and medical judgment seem to be the most essential factors for a positive result.
format article
author Daniel Gómez
Luis F. Cabrera-Vargas
Mauricio Pedraza
Andres Mendoza
Jean A. Pulido-Segura
Ricardo Villarreal-Viana
Andres Urrutia
Sebastian Sanchez-Ussa
Salomone Di Saverio
author_facet Daniel Gómez
Luis F. Cabrera-Vargas
Mauricio Pedraza
Andres Mendoza
Jean A. Pulido-Segura
Ricardo Villarreal-Viana
Andres Urrutia
Sebastian Sanchez-Ussa
Salomone Di Saverio
author_sort Daniel Gómez
title Minimal invasive surgery for multiple adhesive small bowel obstruction: Results of a comparative multicenter study
title_short Minimal invasive surgery for multiple adhesive small bowel obstruction: Results of a comparative multicenter study
title_full Minimal invasive surgery for multiple adhesive small bowel obstruction: Results of a comparative multicenter study
title_fullStr Minimal invasive surgery for multiple adhesive small bowel obstruction: Results of a comparative multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Minimal invasive surgery for multiple adhesive small bowel obstruction: Results of a comparative multicenter study
title_sort minimal invasive surgery for multiple adhesive small bowel obstruction: results of a comparative multicenter study
publisher Permanyer
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/494be13c0fbe49d09a46cd756bf8713e
work_keys_str_mv AT danielgomez minimalinvasivesurgeryformultipleadhesivesmallbowelobstructionresultsofacomparativemulticenterstudy
AT luisfcabreravargas minimalinvasivesurgeryformultipleadhesivesmallbowelobstructionresultsofacomparativemulticenterstudy
AT mauriciopedraza minimalinvasivesurgeryformultipleadhesivesmallbowelobstructionresultsofacomparativemulticenterstudy
AT andresmendoza minimalinvasivesurgeryformultipleadhesivesmallbowelobstructionresultsofacomparativemulticenterstudy
AT jeanapulidosegura minimalinvasivesurgeryformultipleadhesivesmallbowelobstructionresultsofacomparativemulticenterstudy
AT ricardovillarrealviana minimalinvasivesurgeryformultipleadhesivesmallbowelobstructionresultsofacomparativemulticenterstudy
AT andresurrutia minimalinvasivesurgeryformultipleadhesivesmallbowelobstructionresultsofacomparativemulticenterstudy
AT sebastiansanchezussa minimalinvasivesurgeryformultipleadhesivesmallbowelobstructionresultsofacomparativemulticenterstudy
AT salomonedisaverio minimalinvasivesurgeryformultipleadhesivesmallbowelobstructionresultsofacomparativemulticenterstudy
_version_ 1718404570934149120