Contemporary authorship guidelines fail to recognize diverse contributions in conservation science research

Abstract Authorship should acknowledge and reward those deserving of such credit. Moreover, being an author on a paper also means that one assumes ownership of the content. Journals are increasingly requiring author roles to be specified at time of submission using schemes such as the contributor ro...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Steven J. Cooke, Vivian M. Nguyen, Nathan Young, Andrea J. Reid, Dominique G. Roche, Nathan J. Bennett, Trina Rytwinski, Joseph R. Bennett
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Wiley 2021
Materias:	authorship credit fairness collaboration equity diversity Environmental sciences GE1-350 Ecology QH540-549.5
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/497cc3bccfb740edaab4986ddaa8b891
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:497cc3bccfb740edaab4986ddaa8b891
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:497cc3bccfb740edaab4986ddaa8b8912021-11-16T08:30:39ZContemporary authorship guidelines fail to recognize diverse contributions in conservation science research2688-831910.1002/2688-8319.12060https://doaj.org/article/497cc3bccfb740edaab4986ddaa8b8912021-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12060https://doaj.org/toc/2688-8319Abstract Authorship should acknowledge and reward those deserving of such credit. Moreover, being an author on a paper also means that one assumes ownership of the content. Journals are increasingly requiring author roles to be specified at time of submission using schemes such as the contributor roles taxonomy (CRediT) system, which relies on 14 different roles. Yet, there are many other aspects of research that are not adequately captured by the list of roles, particularly in applied environmental disciplines such as conservation science, environmental science and applied ecology. The growing recognition that authorship should reflect contributions that extend beyond the usual data collection, analysis and writing provides the ideal backdrop for rethinking contributions in conservation science. Here we propose a more inclusive approach to authorship that recognizes and values diverse contributions and contributors using an expanded list of CRediT roles.Steven J. CookeVivian M. NguyenNathan YoungAndrea J. ReidDominique G. RocheNathan J. BennettTrina RytwinskiJoseph R. BennettWileyarticleauthorshipcreditfairnesscollaborationequitydiversityEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350EcologyQH540-549.5ENEcological Solutions and Evidence, Vol 2, Iss 2, Pp n/a-n/a (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	authorship credit fairness collaboration equity diversity Environmental sciences GE1-350 Ecology QH540-549.5
spellingShingle	authorship credit fairness collaboration equity diversity Environmental sciences GE1-350 Ecology QH540-549.5 Steven J. Cooke Vivian M. Nguyen Nathan Young Andrea J. Reid Dominique G. Roche Nathan J. Bennett Trina Rytwinski Joseph R. Bennett Contemporary authorship guidelines fail to recognize diverse contributions in conservation science research
description	Abstract Authorship should acknowledge and reward those deserving of such credit. Moreover, being an author on a paper also means that one assumes ownership of the content. Journals are increasingly requiring author roles to be specified at time of submission using schemes such as the contributor roles taxonomy (CRediT) system, which relies on 14 different roles. Yet, there are many other aspects of research that are not adequately captured by the list of roles, particularly in applied environmental disciplines such as conservation science, environmental science and applied ecology. The growing recognition that authorship should reflect contributions that extend beyond the usual data collection, analysis and writing provides the ideal backdrop for rethinking contributions in conservation science. Here we propose a more inclusive approach to authorship that recognizes and values diverse contributions and contributors using an expanded list of CRediT roles.
format	article
author	Steven J. Cooke Vivian M. Nguyen Nathan Young Andrea J. Reid Dominique G. Roche Nathan J. Bennett Trina Rytwinski Joseph R. Bennett
author_facet	Steven J. Cooke Vivian M. Nguyen Nathan Young Andrea J. Reid Dominique G. Roche Nathan J. Bennett Trina Rytwinski Joseph R. Bennett
author_sort	Steven J. Cooke
title	Contemporary authorship guidelines fail to recognize diverse contributions in conservation science research
title_short	Contemporary authorship guidelines fail to recognize diverse contributions in conservation science research
title_full	Contemporary authorship guidelines fail to recognize diverse contributions in conservation science research
title_fullStr	Contemporary authorship guidelines fail to recognize diverse contributions in conservation science research
title_full_unstemmed	Contemporary authorship guidelines fail to recognize diverse contributions in conservation science research
title_sort	contemporary authorship guidelines fail to recognize diverse contributions in conservation science research
publisher	Wiley
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/497cc3bccfb740edaab4986ddaa8b891
work_keys_str_mv	AT stevenjcooke contemporaryauthorshipguidelinesfailtorecognizediversecontributionsinconservationscienceresearch AT vivianmnguyen contemporaryauthorshipguidelinesfailtorecognizediversecontributionsinconservationscienceresearch AT nathanyoung contemporaryauthorshipguidelinesfailtorecognizediversecontributionsinconservationscienceresearch AT andreajreid contemporaryauthorshipguidelinesfailtorecognizediversecontributionsinconservationscienceresearch AT dominiquegroche contemporaryauthorshipguidelinesfailtorecognizediversecontributionsinconservationscienceresearch AT nathanjbennett contemporaryauthorshipguidelinesfailtorecognizediversecontributionsinconservationscienceresearch AT trinarytwinski contemporaryauthorshipguidelinesfailtorecognizediversecontributionsinconservationscienceresearch AT josephrbennett contemporaryauthorshipguidelinesfailtorecognizediversecontributionsinconservationscienceresearch
_version_	1718426600534441984

Contemporary authorship guidelines fail to recognize diverse contributions in conservation science research

Ejemplares similares