A survey of biomedical journals to detect editorial bias and nepotistic behavior.
Alongside the growing concerns regarding predatory journal growth, other questionable editorial practices have gained visibility recently. Among them, we explored the usefulness of the Percentage of Papers by the Most Prolific author (PPMP) and the Gini index (level of inequality in the distribution...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Alexandre Scanff, Florian Naudet, Ioana A Cristea, David Moher, Dorothy V M Bishop, Clara Locher |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/49c97b92d1854207b7853b0ada502d71 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
The new normal? Redaction bias in biomedical science
por: David Robert Grimes, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
An open science pathway for drug marketing authorization-Registered drug approval.
por: Florian Naudet, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Editorial: AI in Biological and Biomedical Imaging
por: Xin Gao, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
A bulk-driven, buffer-biased, gain-boosted amplifier for biomedical signal enhancement
por: Sarin Vijay Mythry, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Editorial: Biomedical Signals for Human-Computer Interaction
por: Hugo Plácido da Silva, et al.
Publicado: (2021)