Brain Death Determination: An Interprofessional Simulation to Determine Brain Death and Communicate with Families Focused on Neurology Residents

Introduction Significant variation exists in determining brain death despite an expectation of competence for all neurology residents. In addition, family discussions regarding brain death are challenging and may influence organ donation. Methods We developed two simulations of increasing complexity...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicholas A. Morris, Eli E. Zimmerman, Charles N. Pozner, Galen V. Henderson, Tracey A. Milligan
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Association of American Medical Colleges 2020
Materias:
L
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/49e8eda13e0e45a49e31b675e521d984
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:49e8eda13e0e45a49e31b675e521d984
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:49e8eda13e0e45a49e31b675e521d9842021-11-19T14:47:23ZBrain Death Determination: An Interprofessional Simulation to Determine Brain Death and Communicate with Families Focused on Neurology Residents10.15766/mep_2374-8265.109782374-8265https://doaj.org/article/49e8eda13e0e45a49e31b675e521d9842020-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.mededportal.org/doi/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10978https://doaj.org/toc/2374-8265Introduction Significant variation exists in determining brain death despite an expectation of competence for all neurology residents. In addition, family discussions regarding brain death are challenging and may influence organ donation. Methods We developed two simulations of increasing complexity for PGY 2 and PGY 3 neurology residents. High-fidelity mannequins were used to simulate patients; standardized actors portrayed family members. In the first simulation, residents determined brain death and shared this information with a grieving family. In the second simulation, residents determined brain death in a more complicated scenario, requiring ancillary testing and accurate result interpretation. Following the determination, residents met with a challenging family. The residents worked with an interdisciplinary team and responded to the family's emotions, used active listening skills, and supported the family through next steps. Results Twelve residents completed the simulations. Prior to the simulation, three (25%) residents felt comfortable discussing a brain death diagnosis; following the simulation, eight (67%) residents felt comfortable/very comfortable discussing brain death. Prior to the simulation, eight (67%) residents stated they knew prerequisites for performing a brain death examination and seven (58%) agreed they knew indications for ancillary testing; these numbers increased to 100% following the simulation. The number of residents who felt comfortable performing the brain death exam increased from five (42%) to 10 (83%). Discussion This simulation of determining brain death and leading difficult family meetings was well-received by neurology residents. Further work should focus on the effects of simulation-based education on practice variation and organ donation consent rates.Nicholas A. MorrisEli E. ZimmermanCharles N. PoznerGalen V. HendersonTracey A. MilliganAssociation of American Medical CollegesarticleBrain DeathSimulationCommunicationNurse/Nurse PractitionerPhysicianPhysician AssistantMedicine (General)R5-920EducationLENMedEdPORTAL, Vol 16 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Brain Death
Simulation
Communication
Nurse/Nurse Practitioner
Physician
Physician Assistant
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Education
L
spellingShingle Brain Death
Simulation
Communication
Nurse/Nurse Practitioner
Physician
Physician Assistant
Medicine (General)
R5-920
Education
L
Nicholas A. Morris
Eli E. Zimmerman
Charles N. Pozner
Galen V. Henderson
Tracey A. Milligan
Brain Death Determination: An Interprofessional Simulation to Determine Brain Death and Communicate with Families Focused on Neurology Residents
description Introduction Significant variation exists in determining brain death despite an expectation of competence for all neurology residents. In addition, family discussions regarding brain death are challenging and may influence organ donation. Methods We developed two simulations of increasing complexity for PGY 2 and PGY 3 neurology residents. High-fidelity mannequins were used to simulate patients; standardized actors portrayed family members. In the first simulation, residents determined brain death and shared this information with a grieving family. In the second simulation, residents determined brain death in a more complicated scenario, requiring ancillary testing and accurate result interpretation. Following the determination, residents met with a challenging family. The residents worked with an interdisciplinary team and responded to the family's emotions, used active listening skills, and supported the family through next steps. Results Twelve residents completed the simulations. Prior to the simulation, three (25%) residents felt comfortable discussing a brain death diagnosis; following the simulation, eight (67%) residents felt comfortable/very comfortable discussing brain death. Prior to the simulation, eight (67%) residents stated they knew prerequisites for performing a brain death examination and seven (58%) agreed they knew indications for ancillary testing; these numbers increased to 100% following the simulation. The number of residents who felt comfortable performing the brain death exam increased from five (42%) to 10 (83%). Discussion This simulation of determining brain death and leading difficult family meetings was well-received by neurology residents. Further work should focus on the effects of simulation-based education on practice variation and organ donation consent rates.
format article
author Nicholas A. Morris
Eli E. Zimmerman
Charles N. Pozner
Galen V. Henderson
Tracey A. Milligan
author_facet Nicholas A. Morris
Eli E. Zimmerman
Charles N. Pozner
Galen V. Henderson
Tracey A. Milligan
author_sort Nicholas A. Morris
title Brain Death Determination: An Interprofessional Simulation to Determine Brain Death and Communicate with Families Focused on Neurology Residents
title_short Brain Death Determination: An Interprofessional Simulation to Determine Brain Death and Communicate with Families Focused on Neurology Residents
title_full Brain Death Determination: An Interprofessional Simulation to Determine Brain Death and Communicate with Families Focused on Neurology Residents
title_fullStr Brain Death Determination: An Interprofessional Simulation to Determine Brain Death and Communicate with Families Focused on Neurology Residents
title_full_unstemmed Brain Death Determination: An Interprofessional Simulation to Determine Brain Death and Communicate with Families Focused on Neurology Residents
title_sort brain death determination: an interprofessional simulation to determine brain death and communicate with families focused on neurology residents
publisher Association of American Medical Colleges
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/49e8eda13e0e45a49e31b675e521d984
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholasamorris braindeathdeterminationaninterprofessionalsimulationtodeterminebraindeathandcommunicatewithfamiliesfocusedonneurologyresidents
AT eliezimmerman braindeathdeterminationaninterprofessionalsimulationtodeterminebraindeathandcommunicatewithfamiliesfocusedonneurologyresidents
AT charlesnpozner braindeathdeterminationaninterprofessionalsimulationtodeterminebraindeathandcommunicatewithfamiliesfocusedonneurologyresidents
AT galenvhenderson braindeathdeterminationaninterprofessionalsimulationtodeterminebraindeathandcommunicatewithfamiliesfocusedonneurologyresidents
AT traceyamilligan braindeathdeterminationaninterprofessionalsimulationtodeterminebraindeathandcommunicatewithfamiliesfocusedonneurologyresidents
_version_ 1718420009586262016