Analysis of GNSS Displacements in Europe and Their Comparison with Hydrological Loading Models

Thanks to the increasing number of permanent GNSS stations in Europe and their long records, we computed position solutions for more than 1000 stations over the last two decades using the REPRO3 orbit and clock products from the IGS CNES-CLS (GRGS) Analysis Center. The velocities, which are mainly d...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alexandre Michel, Alvaro Santamaría-Gómez, Jean-Paul Boy, Félix Perosanz, Sylvain Loyer
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/49f6642615564f3f8ff70e1c7c55b65d
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:49f6642615564f3f8ff70e1c7c55b65d
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:49f6642615564f3f8ff70e1c7c55b65d2021-11-25T18:53:54ZAnalysis of GNSS Displacements in Europe and Their Comparison with Hydrological Loading Models10.3390/rs132245232072-4292https://doaj.org/article/49f6642615564f3f8ff70e1c7c55b65d2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/22/4523https://doaj.org/toc/2072-4292Thanks to the increasing number of permanent GNSS stations in Europe and their long records, we computed position solutions for more than 1000 stations over the last two decades using the REPRO3 orbit and clock products from the IGS CNES-CLS (GRGS) Analysis Center. The velocities, which are mainly due to tectonics and glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA), and the annual solar cycle have been estimated using weighted least squares. The interannual variations have been accounted for in the stochastic model or in the deterministic model. We demonstrated that the velocity and annual cycle, in addition to their uncertainties, depend on the estimation method we used and that the estimation of GPS draconitic oscillations minimises biases in the estimation of annual solar cycle displacements. The annual solar cycle extracted from GPS has been compared with that from loading estimates of several hydrological models. If the annual amplitudes between GPS and hydrological models match, the phases of the loading models were typically in advance of about 1 month compared to GPS. Predictions of displacements modelled from GRACE observations did not show this phase shift. We also found important discrepancies at the interannual frequency band between GNSS, loading estimates derived from GRACE, and hydrological models using principal component analysis (PCA) decomposition. These discrepancies revealed that GNSS position variations in the interannual band cannot be systematically interpreted as a geophysical signal and should instead be interpreted in terms of autocorrelated noise.Alexandre MichelAlvaro Santamaría-GómezJean-Paul BoyFélix PerosanzSylvain LoyerMDPI AGarticleGNSSIGS REPRO3tectonic velocityhydrological loadingprincipal component analysisScienceQENRemote Sensing, Vol 13, Iss 4523, p 4523 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic GNSS
IGS REPRO3
tectonic velocity
hydrological loading
principal component analysis
Science
Q
spellingShingle GNSS
IGS REPRO3
tectonic velocity
hydrological loading
principal component analysis
Science
Q
Alexandre Michel
Alvaro Santamaría-Gómez
Jean-Paul Boy
Félix Perosanz
Sylvain Loyer
Analysis of GNSS Displacements in Europe and Their Comparison with Hydrological Loading Models
description Thanks to the increasing number of permanent GNSS stations in Europe and their long records, we computed position solutions for more than 1000 stations over the last two decades using the REPRO3 orbit and clock products from the IGS CNES-CLS (GRGS) Analysis Center. The velocities, which are mainly due to tectonics and glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA), and the annual solar cycle have been estimated using weighted least squares. The interannual variations have been accounted for in the stochastic model or in the deterministic model. We demonstrated that the velocity and annual cycle, in addition to their uncertainties, depend on the estimation method we used and that the estimation of GPS draconitic oscillations minimises biases in the estimation of annual solar cycle displacements. The annual solar cycle extracted from GPS has been compared with that from loading estimates of several hydrological models. If the annual amplitudes between GPS and hydrological models match, the phases of the loading models were typically in advance of about 1 month compared to GPS. Predictions of displacements modelled from GRACE observations did not show this phase shift. We also found important discrepancies at the interannual frequency band between GNSS, loading estimates derived from GRACE, and hydrological models using principal component analysis (PCA) decomposition. These discrepancies revealed that GNSS position variations in the interannual band cannot be systematically interpreted as a geophysical signal and should instead be interpreted in terms of autocorrelated noise.
format article
author Alexandre Michel
Alvaro Santamaría-Gómez
Jean-Paul Boy
Félix Perosanz
Sylvain Loyer
author_facet Alexandre Michel
Alvaro Santamaría-Gómez
Jean-Paul Boy
Félix Perosanz
Sylvain Loyer
author_sort Alexandre Michel
title Analysis of GNSS Displacements in Europe and Their Comparison with Hydrological Loading Models
title_short Analysis of GNSS Displacements in Europe and Their Comparison with Hydrological Loading Models
title_full Analysis of GNSS Displacements in Europe and Their Comparison with Hydrological Loading Models
title_fullStr Analysis of GNSS Displacements in Europe and Their Comparison with Hydrological Loading Models
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of GNSS Displacements in Europe and Their Comparison with Hydrological Loading Models
title_sort analysis of gnss displacements in europe and their comparison with hydrological loading models
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/49f6642615564f3f8ff70e1c7c55b65d
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandremichel analysisofgnssdisplacementsineuropeandtheircomparisonwithhydrologicalloadingmodels
AT alvarosantamariagomez analysisofgnssdisplacementsineuropeandtheircomparisonwithhydrologicalloadingmodels
AT jeanpaulboy analysisofgnssdisplacementsineuropeandtheircomparisonwithhydrologicalloadingmodels
AT felixperosanz analysisofgnssdisplacementsineuropeandtheircomparisonwithhydrologicalloadingmodels
AT sylvainloyer analysisofgnssdisplacementsineuropeandtheircomparisonwithhydrologicalloadingmodels
_version_ 1718410584391680000