Is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean?

<h4>Objective</h4>To assess obstetric factors associated with hysterotomy extension among women undergoing a second-stage cesarean.<h4>Study design</h4>This 5-year retrospective cohort study (2013-2017) included all women with second-stage cesarean deliveries of live-born sin...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Jade Merrer, Clara Dreyfus, Aude Girault, François Goffinet, Camille Le Ray
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/4ad19137d6f546099422b38d835c369a
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:4ad19137d6f546099422b38d835c369a
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:4ad19137d6f546099422b38d835c369a2021-12-02T20:17:25ZIs duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean?1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0258049https://doaj.org/article/4ad19137d6f546099422b38d835c369a2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258049https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Objective</h4>To assess obstetric factors associated with hysterotomy extension among women undergoing a second-stage cesarean.<h4>Study design</h4>This 5-year retrospective cohort study (2013-2017) included all women with second-stage cesarean deliveries of live-born singleton fetuses in cephalic presentation at term. It took place at a tertiary center that practices delayed pushing. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression to assess the maternal, obstetric, and neonatal factors associated with hysterotomy extension mentioned in the surgical report. Operative time, postpartum hemorrhage, and maternal complications were also studied.<h4>Results</h4>Of the 3350 intrapartum cesareans, 2637 were performed at term for singleton fetuses in cephalic presentation: 747 (28.3%) during the second stage of labor, 83 (11.1%) of which were complicated by a hysterotomy extension. The median duration of the passive phase of the second stage did not differ between women with and without an extension (164 min versus 160 min, P = 0.85). No other second-stage obstetric characteristics, i.e., duration of the active phase, fetal head station, or fetal malposition, were associated with the risk of extension. Factors significantly associated with extension were the surgeon's experience and forceps use during the cesarean. Women with an extension, compared to women without one, had a longer median operative time (49 min versus 32 min, P<0.001) and higher rates of postpartum hemorrhage and blood transfusion (respectively, 30.1% versus 15.1%, p = 0.002 and 7.2% versus 2.4%, P = 0.03).<h4>Conclusion</h4>The risk of a hysterotomy extension does not appear to be associated with second-stage obstetric characteristics, including the duration of the passive phase of this stage. In our center, which practices delayed pushing, prolonging this passive phase beyond 2 hours does not increase the risk of hysterotomy extension in second-stage cesareans.Jade MerrerClara DreyfusAude GiraultFrançois GoffinetCamille Le RayPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 10, p e0258049 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Jade Merrer Clara Dreyfus Aude Girault François Goffinet Camille Le Ray Is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean?
description	<h4>Objective</h4>To assess obstetric factors associated with hysterotomy extension among women undergoing a second-stage cesarean.<h4>Study design</h4>This 5-year retrospective cohort study (2013-2017) included all women with second-stage cesarean deliveries of live-born singleton fetuses in cephalic presentation at term. It took place at a tertiary center that practices delayed pushing. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression to assess the maternal, obstetric, and neonatal factors associated with hysterotomy extension mentioned in the surgical report. Operative time, postpartum hemorrhage, and maternal complications were also studied.<h4>Results</h4>Of the 3350 intrapartum cesareans, 2637 were performed at term for singleton fetuses in cephalic presentation: 747 (28.3%) during the second stage of labor, 83 (11.1%) of which were complicated by a hysterotomy extension. The median duration of the passive phase of the second stage did not differ between women with and without an extension (164 min versus 160 min, P = 0.85). No other second-stage obstetric characteristics, i.e., duration of the active phase, fetal head station, or fetal malposition, were associated with the risk of extension. Factors significantly associated with extension were the surgeon's experience and forceps use during the cesarean. Women with an extension, compared to women without one, had a longer median operative time (49 min versus 32 min, P<0.001) and higher rates of postpartum hemorrhage and blood transfusion (respectively, 30.1% versus 15.1%, p = 0.002 and 7.2% versus 2.4%, P = 0.03).<h4>Conclusion</h4>The risk of a hysterotomy extension does not appear to be associated with second-stage obstetric characteristics, including the duration of the passive phase of this stage. In our center, which practices delayed pushing, prolonging this passive phase beyond 2 hours does not increase the risk of hysterotomy extension in second-stage cesareans.
format	article
author	Jade Merrer Clara Dreyfus Aude Girault François Goffinet Camille Le Ray
author_facet	Jade Merrer Clara Dreyfus Aude Girault François Goffinet Camille Le Ray
author_sort	Jade Merrer
title	Is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean?
title_short	Is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean?
title_full	Is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean?
title_fullStr	Is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean?
title_full_unstemmed	Is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean?
title_sort	is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean?
publisher	Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/4ad19137d6f546099422b38d835c369a
work_keys_str_mv	AT jademerrer isdurationofpassivesecondstageassociatedwithariskofhysterotomyextensionduringcesarean AT claradreyfus isdurationofpassivesecondstageassociatedwithariskofhysterotomyextensionduringcesarean AT audegirault isdurationofpassivesecondstageassociatedwithariskofhysterotomyextensionduringcesarean AT francoisgoffinet isdurationofpassivesecondstageassociatedwithariskofhysterotomyextensionduringcesarean AT camilleleray isdurationofpassivesecondstageassociatedwithariskofhysterotomyextensionduringcesarean
_version_	1718374403972005888

Is duration of passive second stage associated with a risk of hysterotomy extension during cesarean?

Ejemplares similares