Post-tonsillectomy taste dysfunction: Myth or reality?

Lingual branches of the glossopharyngeal nerve (CN Ⅸ) are at risk of injury during tonsillectomy due to their proximity to the muscle layer of the palatine tonsillar bed. However, it is unclear how often this common surgery leads to taste disturbances. We conducted a literature search using PubMed,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liuba Soldatova, Richard L. Doty
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4ad36de0c99145f38fa5da51d93151c1
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4ad36de0c99145f38fa5da51d93151c1
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4ad36de0c99145f38fa5da51d93151c12021-12-02T10:50:34ZPost-tonsillectomy taste dysfunction: Myth or reality?2095-881110.1016/j.wjorl.2018.02.008https://doaj.org/article/4ad36de0c99145f38fa5da51d93151c12018-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095881118300180https://doaj.org/toc/2095-8811Lingual branches of the glossopharyngeal nerve (CN Ⅸ) are at risk of injury during tonsillectomy due to their proximity to the muscle layer of the palatine tonsillar bed. However, it is unclear how often this common surgery leads to taste disturbances. We conducted a literature search using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, PsychInfo, and Ovid Medline to evaluate the available literature on post-tonsillectomy taste disorders. Studies denoting self-reported dysfunction, as well as those employing quantitative testing, i.e., chemogustometry and electrogustometry, were identified. Case reports were excluded. Of the 8 original articles that met our inclusion criteria, only 5 employed quantitative taste tests. The highest prevalence of self-reported taste disturbances occurred two weeks after surgery (32%). Two studies reported post-operative chemical gustometry scores consistent with hypogeusia. However, in the two studies that compared pre- and post-tonsillectomy test scores, one found no difference and the other found a significant difference only for the left rear of the tongue 14 days post-op. In the two studies that employed electrogustometry, elevated post-operative thresholds were noted, although only one compared pre- and post-operative thresholds. This study found no significant differences. No study employed a normal control group to assess the influences of repeated testing on the sensory measures. Overall, this review indicates that studies on post-tonsillectomy taste disorders are limited and ambiguous. Future research employing appropriate control groups and taste testing procedures are needed to define the prevalence, duration, and nature of post-tonsillectomy taste disorders. Keywords: Tonsillectomy, Taste, Ageusia, Hypogeusia, Taste disturbancesLiuba SoldatovaRichard L. DotyKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.articleOtorhinolaryngologyRF1-547SurgeryRD1-811ENWorld Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 77-83 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Otorhinolaryngology
RF1-547
Surgery
RD1-811
spellingShingle Otorhinolaryngology
RF1-547
Surgery
RD1-811
Liuba Soldatova
Richard L. Doty
Post-tonsillectomy taste dysfunction: Myth or reality?
description Lingual branches of the glossopharyngeal nerve (CN Ⅸ) are at risk of injury during tonsillectomy due to their proximity to the muscle layer of the palatine tonsillar bed. However, it is unclear how often this common surgery leads to taste disturbances. We conducted a literature search using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, PsychInfo, and Ovid Medline to evaluate the available literature on post-tonsillectomy taste disorders. Studies denoting self-reported dysfunction, as well as those employing quantitative testing, i.e., chemogustometry and electrogustometry, were identified. Case reports were excluded. Of the 8 original articles that met our inclusion criteria, only 5 employed quantitative taste tests. The highest prevalence of self-reported taste disturbances occurred two weeks after surgery (32%). Two studies reported post-operative chemical gustometry scores consistent with hypogeusia. However, in the two studies that compared pre- and post-tonsillectomy test scores, one found no difference and the other found a significant difference only for the left rear of the tongue 14 days post-op. In the two studies that employed electrogustometry, elevated post-operative thresholds were noted, although only one compared pre- and post-operative thresholds. This study found no significant differences. No study employed a normal control group to assess the influences of repeated testing on the sensory measures. Overall, this review indicates that studies on post-tonsillectomy taste disorders are limited and ambiguous. Future research employing appropriate control groups and taste testing procedures are needed to define the prevalence, duration, and nature of post-tonsillectomy taste disorders. Keywords: Tonsillectomy, Taste, Ageusia, Hypogeusia, Taste disturbances
format article
author Liuba Soldatova
Richard L. Doty
author_facet Liuba Soldatova
Richard L. Doty
author_sort Liuba Soldatova
title Post-tonsillectomy taste dysfunction: Myth or reality?
title_short Post-tonsillectomy taste dysfunction: Myth or reality?
title_full Post-tonsillectomy taste dysfunction: Myth or reality?
title_fullStr Post-tonsillectomy taste dysfunction: Myth or reality?
title_full_unstemmed Post-tonsillectomy taste dysfunction: Myth or reality?
title_sort post-tonsillectomy taste dysfunction: myth or reality?
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/4ad36de0c99145f38fa5da51d93151c1
work_keys_str_mv AT liubasoldatova posttonsillectomytastedysfunctionmythorreality
AT richardldoty posttonsillectomytastedysfunctionmythorreality
_version_ 1718396586818535424