Enhanced Replication of Mouse Adenovirus Type 1 following Virus-Induced Degradation of Protein Kinase R (PKR)

ABSTRACT Protein kinase R (PKR) plays a major role in activating host immunity during infection by sensing double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) produced by viruses. Once activated by dsRNA, PKR phosphorylates the translation factor eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α), halting cellular translation. Many v...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Danielle E. Goodman, Carla D. Pretto, Tomas A. Krepostman, Kelly E. Carnahan, Katherine R. Spindler
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2019
Materias:
PKR
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4add7ad09c4846639e3aaa47abbd4750
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4add7ad09c4846639e3aaa47abbd4750
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4add7ad09c4846639e3aaa47abbd47502021-11-15T15:55:24ZEnhanced Replication of Mouse Adenovirus Type 1 following Virus-Induced Degradation of Protein Kinase R (PKR)10.1128/mBio.00668-192150-7511https://doaj.org/article/4add7ad09c4846639e3aaa47abbd47502019-04-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mBio.00668-19https://doaj.org/toc/2150-7511ABSTRACT Protein kinase R (PKR) plays a major role in activating host immunity during infection by sensing double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) produced by viruses. Once activated by dsRNA, PKR phosphorylates the translation factor eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α), halting cellular translation. Many viruses have methods of inhibiting PKR activation or its downstream effects, circumventing protein synthesis shutdown. These include sequestering dsRNA or producing proteins that bind to and inhibit PKR activation. Here we describe our finding that in multiple cell types, PKR was depleted during mouse adenovirus type 1 (MAV-1) infection. MAV-1 did not appear to be targeting PKR at the transcriptional or translational level, because total PKR mRNA levels and levels of PKR mRNA bound to polysomes were unchanged or increased during MAV-1 infection. However, inhibiting the proteasome reduced the PKR depletion seen in MAV-1-infected cells, whereas inhibiting the lysosome had no effect. This suggests that proteasomal degradation alone is responsible for PKR degradation during MAV-1 infection. Time course experiments indicated that the degradation occurs early after infection. Infecting cells with UV-inactivated virus prevented PKR degradation, whereas inhibiting viral DNA replication did not. Together, these results suggest that an early viral gene is responsible. Degradation of PKR is a rare mechanism to oppose PKR activity, and it has been described in only six RNA viruses. To our knowledge, this is the first example of a DNA virus counteracting PKR by degrading it. IMPORTANCE The first line of defense in cells during viral infection is the innate immune system, which is activated by different viral products. PKR is a part of this innate immune system and is induced by interferon and activated by dsRNA produced by DNA and RNA viruses. PKR is such an important part of the antiviral response that many viral families have gene products to counteract its activation or the resulting effects of its activity. Although a few RNA viruses degrade PKR, this method of counteracting PKR has not been reported for any DNA viruses. MAV-1 does not encode virus-associated RNAs, a human adenoviral defense against PKR activation. Instead, MAV-1 degrades PKR, and it is the first DNA virus reported to do so. The innate immune evasion by PKR degradation is a previously unidentified way for a DNA virus to circumvent the host antiviral response.Danielle E. GoodmanCarla D. PrettoTomas A. KrepostmanKelly E. CarnahanKatherine R. SpindlerAmerican Society for MicrobiologyarticlePKRadenoviruseseIF2alpha kinaseproteasomeprotein degradationprotein stabilityMicrobiologyQR1-502ENmBio, Vol 10, Iss 2 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic PKR
adenoviruses
eIF2alpha kinase
proteasome
protein degradation
protein stability
Microbiology
QR1-502
spellingShingle PKR
adenoviruses
eIF2alpha kinase
proteasome
protein degradation
protein stability
Microbiology
QR1-502
Danielle E. Goodman
Carla D. Pretto
Tomas A. Krepostman
Kelly E. Carnahan
Katherine R. Spindler
Enhanced Replication of Mouse Adenovirus Type 1 following Virus-Induced Degradation of Protein Kinase R (PKR)
description ABSTRACT Protein kinase R (PKR) plays a major role in activating host immunity during infection by sensing double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) produced by viruses. Once activated by dsRNA, PKR phosphorylates the translation factor eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α), halting cellular translation. Many viruses have methods of inhibiting PKR activation or its downstream effects, circumventing protein synthesis shutdown. These include sequestering dsRNA or producing proteins that bind to and inhibit PKR activation. Here we describe our finding that in multiple cell types, PKR was depleted during mouse adenovirus type 1 (MAV-1) infection. MAV-1 did not appear to be targeting PKR at the transcriptional or translational level, because total PKR mRNA levels and levels of PKR mRNA bound to polysomes were unchanged or increased during MAV-1 infection. However, inhibiting the proteasome reduced the PKR depletion seen in MAV-1-infected cells, whereas inhibiting the lysosome had no effect. This suggests that proteasomal degradation alone is responsible for PKR degradation during MAV-1 infection. Time course experiments indicated that the degradation occurs early after infection. Infecting cells with UV-inactivated virus prevented PKR degradation, whereas inhibiting viral DNA replication did not. Together, these results suggest that an early viral gene is responsible. Degradation of PKR is a rare mechanism to oppose PKR activity, and it has been described in only six RNA viruses. To our knowledge, this is the first example of a DNA virus counteracting PKR by degrading it. IMPORTANCE The first line of defense in cells during viral infection is the innate immune system, which is activated by different viral products. PKR is a part of this innate immune system and is induced by interferon and activated by dsRNA produced by DNA and RNA viruses. PKR is such an important part of the antiviral response that many viral families have gene products to counteract its activation or the resulting effects of its activity. Although a few RNA viruses degrade PKR, this method of counteracting PKR has not been reported for any DNA viruses. MAV-1 does not encode virus-associated RNAs, a human adenoviral defense against PKR activation. Instead, MAV-1 degrades PKR, and it is the first DNA virus reported to do so. The innate immune evasion by PKR degradation is a previously unidentified way for a DNA virus to circumvent the host antiviral response.
format article
author Danielle E. Goodman
Carla D. Pretto
Tomas A. Krepostman
Kelly E. Carnahan
Katherine R. Spindler
author_facet Danielle E. Goodman
Carla D. Pretto
Tomas A. Krepostman
Kelly E. Carnahan
Katherine R. Spindler
author_sort Danielle E. Goodman
title Enhanced Replication of Mouse Adenovirus Type 1 following Virus-Induced Degradation of Protein Kinase R (PKR)
title_short Enhanced Replication of Mouse Adenovirus Type 1 following Virus-Induced Degradation of Protein Kinase R (PKR)
title_full Enhanced Replication of Mouse Adenovirus Type 1 following Virus-Induced Degradation of Protein Kinase R (PKR)
title_fullStr Enhanced Replication of Mouse Adenovirus Type 1 following Virus-Induced Degradation of Protein Kinase R (PKR)
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced Replication of Mouse Adenovirus Type 1 following Virus-Induced Degradation of Protein Kinase R (PKR)
title_sort enhanced replication of mouse adenovirus type 1 following virus-induced degradation of protein kinase r (pkr)
publisher American Society for Microbiology
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/4add7ad09c4846639e3aaa47abbd4750
work_keys_str_mv AT danielleegoodman enhancedreplicationofmouseadenovirustype1followingvirusinduceddegradationofproteinkinaserpkr
AT carladpretto enhancedreplicationofmouseadenovirustype1followingvirusinduceddegradationofproteinkinaserpkr
AT tomasakrepostman enhancedreplicationofmouseadenovirustype1followingvirusinduceddegradationofproteinkinaserpkr
AT kellyecarnahan enhancedreplicationofmouseadenovirustype1followingvirusinduceddegradationofproteinkinaserpkr
AT katherinerspindler enhancedreplicationofmouseadenovirustype1followingvirusinduceddegradationofproteinkinaserpkr
_version_ 1718427213214253056