Lower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer
Abstract The oncological advantages of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (RATE) over conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) for thoracic esophageal cancer have yet to be verified. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed clinical data to compare the incidences of recurrence within...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/4b113e30470147c2b60e17e4b49be723 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:4b113e30470147c2b60e17e4b49be723 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:4b113e30470147c2b60e17e4b49be7232021-12-02T17:04:06ZLower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer10.1038/s41598-021-86420-x2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/4b113e30470147c2b60e17e4b49be7232021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86420-xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The oncological advantages of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (RATE) over conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) for thoracic esophageal cancer have yet to be verified. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed clinical data to compare the incidences of recurrence within the surgical field after RATE and TE as an indicator of local oncological control. Among 121 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancers for which thoracoscopic surgery was indicated, 51 were treated with RATE while 70 received TE. The number of lymph nodes dissected from the mediastinum, duration of the thoracic portion of the surgery, and morbidity due to postoperative complications did not differ between the two groups. However, the rate of overall local recurrence within the surgical field was significantly (P = 0.039) higher in the TE (9%) than the RATE (0%) group. Lymph node recurrence within the surgical field occurred in left recurrent nerve, left tracheobronchial, left main bronchus and thoracic paraaortic lymph nodes, which were all difficult to approach to dissect. The other two local failures occurred around the anastomotic site. This study indicates that using RATE enabled the incidence of recurrence within the surgical field to be reduced, though there were some limitations.Satoru MotoyamaYusuke SatoAkiyuki WakitaYushi NagakiHiromu FujitaRyohei SasamoriKohei KemuriyamaShinogu TakashimaKazuhiro ImaiYoshihiro MinamiyaNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Satoru Motoyama Yusuke Sato Akiyuki Wakita Yushi Nagaki Hiromu Fujita Ryohei Sasamori Kohei Kemuriyama Shinogu Takashima Kazuhiro Imai Yoshihiro Minamiya Lower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer |
description |
Abstract The oncological advantages of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (RATE) over conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) for thoracic esophageal cancer have yet to be verified. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed clinical data to compare the incidences of recurrence within the surgical field after RATE and TE as an indicator of local oncological control. Among 121 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancers for which thoracoscopic surgery was indicated, 51 were treated with RATE while 70 received TE. The number of lymph nodes dissected from the mediastinum, duration of the thoracic portion of the surgery, and morbidity due to postoperative complications did not differ between the two groups. However, the rate of overall local recurrence within the surgical field was significantly (P = 0.039) higher in the TE (9%) than the RATE (0%) group. Lymph node recurrence within the surgical field occurred in left recurrent nerve, left tracheobronchial, left main bronchus and thoracic paraaortic lymph nodes, which were all difficult to approach to dissect. The other two local failures occurred around the anastomotic site. This study indicates that using RATE enabled the incidence of recurrence within the surgical field to be reduced, though there were some limitations. |
format |
article |
author |
Satoru Motoyama Yusuke Sato Akiyuki Wakita Yushi Nagaki Hiromu Fujita Ryohei Sasamori Kohei Kemuriyama Shinogu Takashima Kazuhiro Imai Yoshihiro Minamiya |
author_facet |
Satoru Motoyama Yusuke Sato Akiyuki Wakita Yushi Nagaki Hiromu Fujita Ryohei Sasamori Kohei Kemuriyama Shinogu Takashima Kazuhiro Imai Yoshihiro Minamiya |
author_sort |
Satoru Motoyama |
title |
Lower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer |
title_short |
Lower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer |
title_full |
Lower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer |
title_fullStr |
Lower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Lower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer |
title_sort |
lower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/4b113e30470147c2b60e17e4b49be723 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT satorumotoyama lowerlocalrecurrencerateafterrobotassistedthoracoscopicesophagectomythanconventionalthoracoscopicsurgeryforesophagealcancer AT yusukesato lowerlocalrecurrencerateafterrobotassistedthoracoscopicesophagectomythanconventionalthoracoscopicsurgeryforesophagealcancer AT akiyukiwakita lowerlocalrecurrencerateafterrobotassistedthoracoscopicesophagectomythanconventionalthoracoscopicsurgeryforesophagealcancer AT yushinagaki lowerlocalrecurrencerateafterrobotassistedthoracoscopicesophagectomythanconventionalthoracoscopicsurgeryforesophagealcancer AT hiromufujita lowerlocalrecurrencerateafterrobotassistedthoracoscopicesophagectomythanconventionalthoracoscopicsurgeryforesophagealcancer AT ryoheisasamori lowerlocalrecurrencerateafterrobotassistedthoracoscopicesophagectomythanconventionalthoracoscopicsurgeryforesophagealcancer AT koheikemuriyama lowerlocalrecurrencerateafterrobotassistedthoracoscopicesophagectomythanconventionalthoracoscopicsurgeryforesophagealcancer AT shinogutakashima lowerlocalrecurrencerateafterrobotassistedthoracoscopicesophagectomythanconventionalthoracoscopicsurgeryforesophagealcancer AT kazuhiroimai lowerlocalrecurrencerateafterrobotassistedthoracoscopicesophagectomythanconventionalthoracoscopicsurgeryforesophagealcancer AT yoshihirominamiya lowerlocalrecurrencerateafterrobotassistedthoracoscopicesophagectomythanconventionalthoracoscopicsurgeryforesophagealcancer |
_version_ |
1718381846842048512 |