Lower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer

Abstract The oncological advantages of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (RATE) over conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) for thoracic esophageal cancer have yet to be verified. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed clinical data to compare the incidences of recurrence within...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Satoru Motoyama, Yusuke Sato, Akiyuki Wakita, Yushi Nagaki, Hiromu Fujita, Ryohei Sasamori, Kohei Kemuriyama, Shinogu Takashima, Kazuhiro Imai, Yoshihiro Minamiya
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4b113e30470147c2b60e17e4b49be723
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4b113e30470147c2b60e17e4b49be723
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4b113e30470147c2b60e17e4b49be7232021-12-02T17:04:06ZLower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer10.1038/s41598-021-86420-x2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/4b113e30470147c2b60e17e4b49be7232021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86420-xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The oncological advantages of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (RATE) over conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) for thoracic esophageal cancer have yet to be verified. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed clinical data to compare the incidences of recurrence within the surgical field after RATE and TE as an indicator of local oncological control. Among 121 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancers for which thoracoscopic surgery was indicated, 51 were treated with RATE while 70 received TE. The number of lymph nodes dissected from the mediastinum, duration of the thoracic portion of the surgery, and morbidity due to postoperative complications did not differ between the two groups. However, the rate of overall local recurrence within the surgical field was significantly (P = 0.039) higher in the TE (9%) than the RATE (0%) group. Lymph node recurrence within the surgical field occurred in left recurrent nerve, left tracheobronchial, left main bronchus and thoracic paraaortic lymph nodes, which were all difficult to approach to dissect. The other two local failures occurred around the anastomotic site. This study indicates that using RATE enabled the incidence of recurrence within the surgical field to be reduced, though there were some limitations.Satoru MotoyamaYusuke SatoAkiyuki WakitaYushi NagakiHiromu FujitaRyohei SasamoriKohei KemuriyamaShinogu TakashimaKazuhiro ImaiYoshihiro MinamiyaNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Satoru Motoyama
Yusuke Sato
Akiyuki Wakita
Yushi Nagaki
Hiromu Fujita
Ryohei Sasamori
Kohei Kemuriyama
Shinogu Takashima
Kazuhiro Imai
Yoshihiro Minamiya
Lower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer
description Abstract The oncological advantages of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (RATE) over conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) for thoracic esophageal cancer have yet to be verified. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed clinical data to compare the incidences of recurrence within the surgical field after RATE and TE as an indicator of local oncological control. Among 121 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancers for which thoracoscopic surgery was indicated, 51 were treated with RATE while 70 received TE. The number of lymph nodes dissected from the mediastinum, duration of the thoracic portion of the surgery, and morbidity due to postoperative complications did not differ between the two groups. However, the rate of overall local recurrence within the surgical field was significantly (P = 0.039) higher in the TE (9%) than the RATE (0%) group. Lymph node recurrence within the surgical field occurred in left recurrent nerve, left tracheobronchial, left main bronchus and thoracic paraaortic lymph nodes, which were all difficult to approach to dissect. The other two local failures occurred around the anastomotic site. This study indicates that using RATE enabled the incidence of recurrence within the surgical field to be reduced, though there were some limitations.
format article
author Satoru Motoyama
Yusuke Sato
Akiyuki Wakita
Yushi Nagaki
Hiromu Fujita
Ryohei Sasamori
Kohei Kemuriyama
Shinogu Takashima
Kazuhiro Imai
Yoshihiro Minamiya
author_facet Satoru Motoyama
Yusuke Sato
Akiyuki Wakita
Yushi Nagaki
Hiromu Fujita
Ryohei Sasamori
Kohei Kemuriyama
Shinogu Takashima
Kazuhiro Imai
Yoshihiro Minamiya
author_sort Satoru Motoyama
title Lower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer
title_short Lower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer
title_full Lower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer
title_fullStr Lower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Lower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer
title_sort lower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/4b113e30470147c2b60e17e4b49be723
work_keys_str_mv AT satorumotoyama lowerlocalrecurrencerateafterrobotassistedthoracoscopicesophagectomythanconventionalthoracoscopicsurgeryforesophagealcancer
AT yusukesato lowerlocalrecurrencerateafterrobotassistedthoracoscopicesophagectomythanconventionalthoracoscopicsurgeryforesophagealcancer
AT akiyukiwakita lowerlocalrecurrencerateafterrobotassistedthoracoscopicesophagectomythanconventionalthoracoscopicsurgeryforesophagealcancer
AT yushinagaki lowerlocalrecurrencerateafterrobotassistedthoracoscopicesophagectomythanconventionalthoracoscopicsurgeryforesophagealcancer
AT hiromufujita lowerlocalrecurrencerateafterrobotassistedthoracoscopicesophagectomythanconventionalthoracoscopicsurgeryforesophagealcancer
AT ryoheisasamori lowerlocalrecurrencerateafterrobotassistedthoracoscopicesophagectomythanconventionalthoracoscopicsurgeryforesophagealcancer
AT koheikemuriyama lowerlocalrecurrencerateafterrobotassistedthoracoscopicesophagectomythanconventionalthoracoscopicsurgeryforesophagealcancer
AT shinogutakashima lowerlocalrecurrencerateafterrobotassistedthoracoscopicesophagectomythanconventionalthoracoscopicsurgeryforesophagealcancer
AT kazuhiroimai lowerlocalrecurrencerateafterrobotassistedthoracoscopicesophagectomythanconventionalthoracoscopicsurgeryforesophagealcancer
AT yoshihirominamiya lowerlocalrecurrencerateafterrobotassistedthoracoscopicesophagectomythanconventionalthoracoscopicsurgeryforesophagealcancer
_version_ 1718381846842048512