Positioning Religion in International Relations: The Performative, Discursive, and Relational Dimension of Religious Soft Power

Amidst the global religious resurgence in the post-secular world, the field of international relations finds itself unwilling or unable to situate religion back to theoretical paradigms subject to the Westphalian–Enlightenment prejudice. Advocates of religion’s theoretical and empirical significance...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zikun Yang, Li Li
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4b38d2594ffb46bcbaf9343319ade205
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4b38d2594ffb46bcbaf9343319ade205
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4b38d2594ffb46bcbaf9343319ade2052021-11-25T18:52:41ZPositioning Religion in International Relations: The Performative, Discursive, and Relational Dimension of Religious Soft Power10.3390/rel121109402077-1444https://doaj.org/article/4b38d2594ffb46bcbaf9343319ade2052021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/11/940https://doaj.org/toc/2077-1444Amidst the global religious resurgence in the post-secular world, the field of international relations finds itself unwilling or unable to situate religion back to theoretical paradigms subject to the Westphalian–Enlightenment prejudice. Advocates of religion’s theoretical and empirical significance often turn to religious soft power, a burgeoning theory that gradually becomes the anchorage of discussion but still suffers from conceptual ambiguity and limited explanatory capacity. This essay endeavors to fill in this lacuna by presenting the interdisciplinary attempt to integrate soft power in IR with the three dimensions of power in sociology, which results in a typology of performative, discursive, and relational dimensions of religious soft power. The explanatory and predictive capacity of this model is tested in the empirical case of the evangelical group’s influence on US foreign policy of the post 9/11 Global War on Terror. A process-level historical account based on archival sources furthers scholars’ knowledge of transnational religious actors’ ability to seize both systematic transformations at the international level and contentious dynamics in the domestic environment, which generates a reorientation in norms, identities, and values that contributes to the outcome of foreign policy, thereby answering the un-addressed question of how religion influences domestic and international politics. The bridging of IR, sociology, and historical sociology, three fields often intertwined, suggests a future direction for not only the religious return to IR but also the overcoming of the “intellectual autism” of this discipline, which needs to be better prepared for continuous challenges of soaring populism, nationalism, and clash of civilizations in the twenty-first century.Zikun YangLi LiMDPI AGarticlereligionsinternational relationssoft powerevangelicalUS foreign policypolitical sociologyReligions. Mythology. RationalismBL1-2790ENReligions, Vol 12, Iss 940, p 940 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic religions
international relations
soft power
evangelical
US foreign policy
political sociology
Religions. Mythology. Rationalism
BL1-2790
spellingShingle religions
international relations
soft power
evangelical
US foreign policy
political sociology
Religions. Mythology. Rationalism
BL1-2790
Zikun Yang
Li Li
Positioning Religion in International Relations: The Performative, Discursive, and Relational Dimension of Religious Soft Power
description Amidst the global religious resurgence in the post-secular world, the field of international relations finds itself unwilling or unable to situate religion back to theoretical paradigms subject to the Westphalian–Enlightenment prejudice. Advocates of religion’s theoretical and empirical significance often turn to religious soft power, a burgeoning theory that gradually becomes the anchorage of discussion but still suffers from conceptual ambiguity and limited explanatory capacity. This essay endeavors to fill in this lacuna by presenting the interdisciplinary attempt to integrate soft power in IR with the three dimensions of power in sociology, which results in a typology of performative, discursive, and relational dimensions of religious soft power. The explanatory and predictive capacity of this model is tested in the empirical case of the evangelical group’s influence on US foreign policy of the post 9/11 Global War on Terror. A process-level historical account based on archival sources furthers scholars’ knowledge of transnational religious actors’ ability to seize both systematic transformations at the international level and contentious dynamics in the domestic environment, which generates a reorientation in norms, identities, and values that contributes to the outcome of foreign policy, thereby answering the un-addressed question of how religion influences domestic and international politics. The bridging of IR, sociology, and historical sociology, three fields often intertwined, suggests a future direction for not only the religious return to IR but also the overcoming of the “intellectual autism” of this discipline, which needs to be better prepared for continuous challenges of soaring populism, nationalism, and clash of civilizations in the twenty-first century.
format article
author Zikun Yang
Li Li
author_facet Zikun Yang
Li Li
author_sort Zikun Yang
title Positioning Religion in International Relations: The Performative, Discursive, and Relational Dimension of Religious Soft Power
title_short Positioning Religion in International Relations: The Performative, Discursive, and Relational Dimension of Religious Soft Power
title_full Positioning Religion in International Relations: The Performative, Discursive, and Relational Dimension of Religious Soft Power
title_fullStr Positioning Religion in International Relations: The Performative, Discursive, and Relational Dimension of Religious Soft Power
title_full_unstemmed Positioning Religion in International Relations: The Performative, Discursive, and Relational Dimension of Religious Soft Power
title_sort positioning religion in international relations: the performative, discursive, and relational dimension of religious soft power
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/4b38d2594ffb46bcbaf9343319ade205
work_keys_str_mv AT zikunyang positioningreligionininternationalrelationstheperformativediscursiveandrelationaldimensionofreligioussoftpower
AT lili positioningreligionininternationalrelationstheperformativediscursiveandrelationaldimensionofreligioussoftpower
_version_ 1718410584607686656