#CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns: A Twitter Analysis

Background: The CDC hosts monthly panel presentations titled ‘Public Health Grand Rounds’ and publishes monthly reports known as Vital Signs. Hashtags #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns were used to promote them on Twitter. Objectives: This study quantified the effect of hashtag count, mention count, a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ashley M. Jackson, Lindsay A. Mullican, Jingjing Yin, Zion Tsz Ho Tse, Hai Liang, King-Wa Fu, Jennifer O. Ahweyevu, Jimmy J. Jenkins III, Nitin Saroha, Isaac Chun-Hai Fung
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4b9ba0dadac3464eb35bd338bf66da44
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4b9ba0dadac3464eb35bd338bf66da44
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4b9ba0dadac3464eb35bd338bf66da442021-12-02T08:53:15Z#CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns: A Twitter Analysis2214-999610.29024/aogh.2381https://doaj.org/article/4b9ba0dadac3464eb35bd338bf66da442018-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://annalsofglobalhealth.org/articles/2381https://doaj.org/toc/2214-9996Background: The CDC hosts monthly panel presentations titled ‘Public Health Grand Rounds’ and publishes monthly reports known as Vital Signs. Hashtags #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns were used to promote them on Twitter. Objectives: This study quantified the effect of hashtag count, mention count, and URL count and attaching visual cues to #CDCGrandRounds or #VitalSigns tweets on their retweet frequency. Methods: Through Twitter Search Application Programming Interface, original tweets containing the hashtag #CDCGrandRounds (n = 6,966; April 21, 2011–October 25, 2016) and the hashtag #VitalSigns (n = 15,015; March 19, 2013–October 31, 2016) were retrieved respectively. Negative binomial regression models were applied to each corpus to estimate the associations between retweet frequency and three predictors (hashtag count, mention count, and URL link count). Each corpus was sub-set into cycles (#CDCGrandRounds: n = 58, #VitalSigns: n = 42). We manually coded the 30 tweets with the highest number of retweets for each cycle, whether it contained visual cues (images or videos). Univariable negative binomial regression models were applied to compute the prevalence ratio (PR) of retweet frequency for each cycle, between tweets with and without visual cues. Findings: URL links increased retweet frequency in both corpora; effects of hashtag count and mention count differed between the two corpora. Of the 58 #CDCGrandRounds cycles, 29 were found to have statistically significantly different retweet frequencies between tweets with and without visual cues. Of these 29 cycles, one had a PR estimate < 1; twenty-four, PR > 1 but < 3; and four, PR > 3. Of the 42 #VitalSigns cycles, 19 were statistically significant. Of these 19 cycles, six were PR > 1 and < 3; and thirteen, PR > 3. Conclusions: The increase of retweet frequency through attaching visual cues varied across cycles for original tweets with #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns. Future research is needed to determine the optimal choice of visual cues to maximize the influence of public health tweets.Ashley M. JacksonLindsay A. MullicanJingjing YinZion Tsz Ho TseHai LiangKing-Wa FuJennifer O. AhweyevuJimmy J. Jenkins IIINitin SarohaIsaac Chun-Hai FungUbiquity PressarticleInfectious and parasitic diseasesRC109-216Public aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENAnnals of Global Health, Vol 84, Iss 4, Pp 710-716 (2018)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle Infectious and parasitic diseases
RC109-216
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Ashley M. Jackson
Lindsay A. Mullican
Jingjing Yin
Zion Tsz Ho Tse
Hai Liang
King-Wa Fu
Jennifer O. Ahweyevu
Jimmy J. Jenkins III
Nitin Saroha
Isaac Chun-Hai Fung
#CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns: A Twitter Analysis
description Background: The CDC hosts monthly panel presentations titled ‘Public Health Grand Rounds’ and publishes monthly reports known as Vital Signs. Hashtags #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns were used to promote them on Twitter. Objectives: This study quantified the effect of hashtag count, mention count, and URL count and attaching visual cues to #CDCGrandRounds or #VitalSigns tweets on their retweet frequency. Methods: Through Twitter Search Application Programming Interface, original tweets containing the hashtag #CDCGrandRounds (n = 6,966; April 21, 2011–October 25, 2016) and the hashtag #VitalSigns (n = 15,015; March 19, 2013–October 31, 2016) were retrieved respectively. Negative binomial regression models were applied to each corpus to estimate the associations between retweet frequency and three predictors (hashtag count, mention count, and URL link count). Each corpus was sub-set into cycles (#CDCGrandRounds: n = 58, #VitalSigns: n = 42). We manually coded the 30 tweets with the highest number of retweets for each cycle, whether it contained visual cues (images or videos). Univariable negative binomial regression models were applied to compute the prevalence ratio (PR) of retweet frequency for each cycle, between tweets with and without visual cues. Findings: URL links increased retweet frequency in both corpora; effects of hashtag count and mention count differed between the two corpora. Of the 58 #CDCGrandRounds cycles, 29 were found to have statistically significantly different retweet frequencies between tweets with and without visual cues. Of these 29 cycles, one had a PR estimate < 1; twenty-four, PR > 1 but < 3; and four, PR > 3. Of the 42 #VitalSigns cycles, 19 were statistically significant. Of these 19 cycles, six were PR > 1 and < 3; and thirteen, PR > 3. Conclusions: The increase of retweet frequency through attaching visual cues varied across cycles for original tweets with #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns. Future research is needed to determine the optimal choice of visual cues to maximize the influence of public health tweets.
format article
author Ashley M. Jackson
Lindsay A. Mullican
Jingjing Yin
Zion Tsz Ho Tse
Hai Liang
King-Wa Fu
Jennifer O. Ahweyevu
Jimmy J. Jenkins III
Nitin Saroha
Isaac Chun-Hai Fung
author_facet Ashley M. Jackson
Lindsay A. Mullican
Jingjing Yin
Zion Tsz Ho Tse
Hai Liang
King-Wa Fu
Jennifer O. Ahweyevu
Jimmy J. Jenkins III
Nitin Saroha
Isaac Chun-Hai Fung
author_sort Ashley M. Jackson
title #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns: A Twitter Analysis
title_short #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns: A Twitter Analysis
title_full #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns: A Twitter Analysis
title_fullStr #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns: A Twitter Analysis
title_full_unstemmed #CDCGrandRounds and #VitalSigns: A Twitter Analysis
title_sort #cdcgrandrounds and #vitalsigns: a twitter analysis
publisher Ubiquity Press
publishDate 2018
url https://doaj.org/article/4b9ba0dadac3464eb35bd338bf66da44
work_keys_str_mv AT ashleymjackson cdcgrandroundsandvitalsignsatwitteranalysis
AT lindsayamullican cdcgrandroundsandvitalsignsatwitteranalysis
AT jingjingyin cdcgrandroundsandvitalsignsatwitteranalysis
AT ziontszhotse cdcgrandroundsandvitalsignsatwitteranalysis
AT hailiang cdcgrandroundsandvitalsignsatwitteranalysis
AT kingwafu cdcgrandroundsandvitalsignsatwitteranalysis
AT jenniferoahweyevu cdcgrandroundsandvitalsignsatwitteranalysis
AT jimmyjjenkinsiii cdcgrandroundsandvitalsignsatwitteranalysis
AT nitinsaroha cdcgrandroundsandvitalsignsatwitteranalysis
AT isaacchunhaifung cdcgrandroundsandvitalsignsatwitteranalysis
_version_ 1718398299933769728