Tunnelling times, Larmor clock, and the elephant in the room

Abstract A controversy surrounding the “tunnelling time problem” stems from the seeming inability of quantum mechanics to provide, in the usual way, a definition of the duration a particle is supposed to spend in a given region of space. For this reason, the problem is often approached from an “oper...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D. Sokolovski, E. Akhmatskaya
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4b9dc978784346f88bc0230eb6dc1dd7
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4b9dc978784346f88bc0230eb6dc1dd7
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4b9dc978784346f88bc0230eb6dc1dd72021-12-02T17:02:13ZTunnelling times, Larmor clock, and the elephant in the room10.1038/s41598-021-89247-82045-2322https://doaj.org/article/4b9dc978784346f88bc0230eb6dc1dd72021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89247-8https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract A controversy surrounding the “tunnelling time problem” stems from the seeming inability of quantum mechanics to provide, in the usual way, a definition of the duration a particle is supposed to spend in a given region of space. For this reason, the problem is often approached from an “operational” angle. Typically, one tries to mimic, in a quantum case, an experiment which yields the desired result for a classical particle. One such approach is based on the use of a Larmor clock. We show that the difficulty with applying a non-perturbing Larmor clock in order to “time” a classically forbidden transition arises from the quantum Uncertainty Principle. We also demonstrate that for this reason a Larmor time (in fact, any Larmor time) cannot be interpreted as a physical time interval. We provide a theoretical description of the quantities measured by the clock.D. SokolovskiE. AkhmatskayaNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
D. Sokolovski
E. Akhmatskaya
Tunnelling times, Larmor clock, and the elephant in the room
description Abstract A controversy surrounding the “tunnelling time problem” stems from the seeming inability of quantum mechanics to provide, in the usual way, a definition of the duration a particle is supposed to spend in a given region of space. For this reason, the problem is often approached from an “operational” angle. Typically, one tries to mimic, in a quantum case, an experiment which yields the desired result for a classical particle. One such approach is based on the use of a Larmor clock. We show that the difficulty with applying a non-perturbing Larmor clock in order to “time” a classically forbidden transition arises from the quantum Uncertainty Principle. We also demonstrate that for this reason a Larmor time (in fact, any Larmor time) cannot be interpreted as a physical time interval. We provide a theoretical description of the quantities measured by the clock.
format article
author D. Sokolovski
E. Akhmatskaya
author_facet D. Sokolovski
E. Akhmatskaya
author_sort D. Sokolovski
title Tunnelling times, Larmor clock, and the elephant in the room
title_short Tunnelling times, Larmor clock, and the elephant in the room
title_full Tunnelling times, Larmor clock, and the elephant in the room
title_fullStr Tunnelling times, Larmor clock, and the elephant in the room
title_full_unstemmed Tunnelling times, Larmor clock, and the elephant in the room
title_sort tunnelling times, larmor clock, and the elephant in the room
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/4b9dc978784346f88bc0230eb6dc1dd7
work_keys_str_mv AT dsokolovski tunnellingtimeslarmorclockandtheelephantintheroom
AT eakhmatskaya tunnellingtimeslarmorclockandtheelephantintheroom
_version_ 1718381904355393536