COVID-19 among Nursing Staff: Settings and Regional Differences

Background/Aims: So far detailed insights into the nursing staff’s COVID-19 symptoms, testing, and results are missing. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the setting and regional differences in the occurrence of COVID-19 among nursing staff, analysing symptoms, testing, and their respective re...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manuela Hoedl, Doris Eglseer, Silvia Bauer
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Karger Publishers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4bd659baef184ae4b2425326cd00d1b8
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4bd659baef184ae4b2425326cd00d1b8
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4bd659baef184ae4b2425326cd00d1b82021-12-02T12:40:23ZCOVID-19 among Nursing Staff: Settings and Regional Differences2504-31372504-314510.1159/000520475https://doaj.org/article/4bd659baef184ae4b2425326cd00d1b82021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/520475https://doaj.org/toc/2504-3137https://doaj.org/toc/2504-3145Background/Aims: So far detailed insights into the nursing staff’s COVID-19 symptoms, testing, and results are missing. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the setting and regional differences in the occurrence of COVID-19 among nursing staff, analysing symptoms, testing, and their respective results. Methods: We used an online survey to conduct this cross-sectional study among Austrian nursing staff in different settings between May 12 and July 13, 2020. This article follows the STROBE statement. The survey includes demographic data, including age, professional qualification, e.g., nurse, nurse aid, and in which federal state and setting the participants work. In addition, we asked for COVID-19 symptoms and (result of the) testing. We used descriptive statistics as well as bivariate analysis to calculate the differences. Results: Nearly every sixth nurse reported experiencing COVID-19 symptoms. We found statistically significant differences between the settings and the federal provinces for the reported COVID-19 symptoms, but not the test results. In total, 1.6% of the participating nurses were tested for COVID-19, of which all were positive for COVID-19. Conclusions: In the future during a pandemic, health care staff should be comprehensively tested in all settings. Our results showed that shifting the perspectives from critical/acute settings to other settings, such as nursing homes, is needed.Manuela HoedlDoris EglseerSilvia BauerKarger Publishersarticlecovid-19coronavirus infectionsnursessymptomsdiagnosisPublic aspects of medicineRA1-1270ENPortuguese Journal of Public Health, Pp 1-6 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic covid-19
coronavirus infections
nurses
symptoms
diagnosis
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
spellingShingle covid-19
coronavirus infections
nurses
symptoms
diagnosis
Public aspects of medicine
RA1-1270
Manuela Hoedl
Doris Eglseer
Silvia Bauer
COVID-19 among Nursing Staff: Settings and Regional Differences
description Background/Aims: So far detailed insights into the nursing staff’s COVID-19 symptoms, testing, and results are missing. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the setting and regional differences in the occurrence of COVID-19 among nursing staff, analysing symptoms, testing, and their respective results. Methods: We used an online survey to conduct this cross-sectional study among Austrian nursing staff in different settings between May 12 and July 13, 2020. This article follows the STROBE statement. The survey includes demographic data, including age, professional qualification, e.g., nurse, nurse aid, and in which federal state and setting the participants work. In addition, we asked for COVID-19 symptoms and (result of the) testing. We used descriptive statistics as well as bivariate analysis to calculate the differences. Results: Nearly every sixth nurse reported experiencing COVID-19 symptoms. We found statistically significant differences between the settings and the federal provinces for the reported COVID-19 symptoms, but not the test results. In total, 1.6% of the participating nurses were tested for COVID-19, of which all were positive for COVID-19. Conclusions: In the future during a pandemic, health care staff should be comprehensively tested in all settings. Our results showed that shifting the perspectives from critical/acute settings to other settings, such as nursing homes, is needed.
format article
author Manuela Hoedl
Doris Eglseer
Silvia Bauer
author_facet Manuela Hoedl
Doris Eglseer
Silvia Bauer
author_sort Manuela Hoedl
title COVID-19 among Nursing Staff: Settings and Regional Differences
title_short COVID-19 among Nursing Staff: Settings and Regional Differences
title_full COVID-19 among Nursing Staff: Settings and Regional Differences
title_fullStr COVID-19 among Nursing Staff: Settings and Regional Differences
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 among Nursing Staff: Settings and Regional Differences
title_sort covid-19 among nursing staff: settings and regional differences
publisher Karger Publishers
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/4bd659baef184ae4b2425326cd00d1b8
work_keys_str_mv AT manuelahoedl covid19amongnursingstaffsettingsandregionaldifferences
AT doriseglseer covid19amongnursingstaffsettingsandregionaldifferences
AT silviabauer covid19amongnursingstaffsettingsandregionaldifferences
_version_ 1718393737093054464