Singing Philosophy: Deviating Voices and Rhythms without a Time Signature

This text practices a philosophical voice that deviates from visuo-centric theory and the muteness of its language and instead sings a complex simultaneity of things and thoughts that burn through the walls of the discipline and illuminate the activities at the margins. This philosophical voice sing...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Voegelin Salomé
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	De Gruyter 2021
Materias:	song voice simultaneity time space sounding listening philosophy polyphony body Philosophy (General) B1-5802
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/4bda211ff3fa43aa94fbbbcc7871a230
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:4bda211ff3fa43aa94fbbbcc7871a230
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:4bda211ff3fa43aa94fbbbcc7871a2302021-12-05T14:11:01ZSinging Philosophy: Deviating Voices and Rhythms without a Time Signature2543-887510.1515/opphil-2020-0186https://doaj.org/article/4bda211ff3fa43aa94fbbbcc7871a2302021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2020-0186https://doaj.org/toc/2543-8875This text practices a philosophical voice that deviates from visuo-centric theory and the muteness of its language and instead sings a complex simultaneity of things and thoughts that burn through the walls of the discipline and illuminate the activities at the margins. This philosophical voice sings a refrain of “I,” which brings us back to bring us forward, surprising us in its renewal again and again. It is a body that is, as Samuel Beckett’s Not I, at once not I and I; an idiosyncratic subjectivity that carries its plural name in its mouth. In this way, it further diffracts the sonic possibility of counterfactual slices into simultaneous dimensionalities open to our gaze in the dark, when we have let go of a normative orientation and are able to see the image at its depth. Between text scores, Churten theory, Canto Cardenche, and the breath of a humpback whale, this voice tries not to theorise. It does not want to produce a philosophical message, supporting a “philosophism” which akin to “scientism” treats philosophy as a phenomenon unconnected to cultural values or location, gender or racial specificity. Instead, it aims to practice a philosophy that opens in song to its own anxiety of objectivity, its fear of a reflective centre, and performs a translucent marginality that generates the view of a plural world burning through a permeable skin.Voegelin SaloméDe GruyterarticlesongvoicesimultaneitytimespacesoundinglisteningphilosophypolyphonybodyPhilosophy (General)B1-5802ENOpen Philosophy, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 284-291 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	song voice simultaneity time space sounding listening philosophy polyphony body Philosophy (General) B1-5802
spellingShingle	song voice simultaneity time space sounding listening philosophy polyphony body Philosophy (General) B1-5802 Voegelin Salomé Singing Philosophy: Deviating Voices and Rhythms without a Time Signature
description	This text practices a philosophical voice that deviates from visuo-centric theory and the muteness of its language and instead sings a complex simultaneity of things and thoughts that burn through the walls of the discipline and illuminate the activities at the margins. This philosophical voice sings a refrain of “I,” which brings us back to bring us forward, surprising us in its renewal again and again. It is a body that is, as Samuel Beckett’s Not I, at once not I and I; an idiosyncratic subjectivity that carries its plural name in its mouth. In this way, it further diffracts the sonic possibility of counterfactual slices into simultaneous dimensionalities open to our gaze in the dark, when we have let go of a normative orientation and are able to see the image at its depth. Between text scores, Churten theory, Canto Cardenche, and the breath of a humpback whale, this voice tries not to theorise. It does not want to produce a philosophical message, supporting a “philosophism” which akin to “scientism” treats philosophy as a phenomenon unconnected to cultural values or location, gender or racial specificity. Instead, it aims to practice a philosophy that opens in song to its own anxiety of objectivity, its fear of a reflective centre, and performs a translucent marginality that generates the view of a plural world burning through a permeable skin.
format	article
author	Voegelin Salomé
author_facet	Voegelin Salomé
author_sort	Voegelin Salomé
title	Singing Philosophy: Deviating Voices and Rhythms without a Time Signature
title_short	Singing Philosophy: Deviating Voices and Rhythms without a Time Signature
title_full	Singing Philosophy: Deviating Voices and Rhythms without a Time Signature
title_fullStr	Singing Philosophy: Deviating Voices and Rhythms without a Time Signature
title_full_unstemmed	Singing Philosophy: Deviating Voices and Rhythms without a Time Signature
title_sort	singing philosophy: deviating voices and rhythms without a time signature
publisher	De Gruyter
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/4bda211ff3fa43aa94fbbbcc7871a230
work_keys_str_mv	AT voegelinsalome singingphilosophydeviatingvoicesandrhythmswithoutatimesignature
_version_	1718371472577134592

Singing Philosophy: Deviating Voices and Rhythms without a Time Signature

Ejemplares similares