Robotic stone surgery – Current state and future prospects: A systematic review

Objective: To provide a comprehensive review of robot-assisted surgery in urolithiasis and to consider the future prospects of robotic approaches in stone surgery. Materials and methods: We performed a systematic PubMed© literature search using predefined Medical Subject Headings search terms to ide...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Philippe F. Müller, Daniel Schlager, Simon Hein, Christian Bach, Arkadiusz Miernik, Dominik S. Schoeb
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Taylor & Francis Group 2018
Materias:	Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology RC870-923
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/4c1466edb9324e6cb62aad0eaf447260
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:4c1466edb9324e6cb62aad0eaf447260
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:4c1466edb9324e6cb62aad0eaf4472602021-12-02T10:23:51ZRobotic stone surgery – Current state and future prospects: A systematic review2090-598X10.1016/j.aju.2017.09.004https://doaj.org/article/4c1466edb9324e6cb62aad0eaf4472602018-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090598X17301055https://doaj.org/toc/2090-598XObjective: To provide a comprehensive review of robot-assisted surgery in urolithiasis and to consider the future prospects of robotic approaches in stone surgery. Materials and methods: We performed a systematic PubMed© literature search using predefined Medical Subject Headings search terms to identify PubMed-listed clinical research studies on robotic stone surgery. All authors screened the results for eligibility and two independent reviewers performed the data extraction. Results: The most common approach in robotic stone surgery is a robot-assisted pyelolithotomy using the da Vinci™ system (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Several studies show this technique to be comparable to classic laparoscopic and open surgical interventions. One study that focused on ureteric stones showed a similar result. In recent years, promising data on robotic intrarenal surgery have been reported (Roboflex Avicenna™; Elmed Medical Systems, Ankara, Turkey). Initial studies have shown its feasibility and high stone-free rates and prove that this novel endoscopic approach is safe for the patient and comfortable for the surgeon. Conclusions: The benefits of robotic devices in stone surgery in existing endourological, laparoscopic, and open treatment strategies still need elucidation. Although recent data are promising, more prospective randomised controlled studies are necessary to clarify the impact of this technique on patient safety and stone-free rates. Keywords: Robotic stone surgery, Urolithiasis, Nephrolithiasis, Stone disease, EndourologyPhilippe F. MüllerDaniel SchlagerSimon HeinChristian BachArkadiusz MiernikDominik S. SchoebTaylor & Francis GrouparticleDiseases of the genitourinary system. UrologyRC870-923ENArab Journal of Urology, Vol 16, Iss 3, Pp 357-364 (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology RC870-923
spellingShingle	Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology RC870-923 Philippe F. Müller Daniel Schlager Simon Hein Christian Bach Arkadiusz Miernik Dominik S. Schoeb Robotic stone surgery – Current state and future prospects: A systematic review
description	Objective: To provide a comprehensive review of robot-assisted surgery in urolithiasis and to consider the future prospects of robotic approaches in stone surgery. Materials and methods: We performed a systematic PubMed© literature search using predefined Medical Subject Headings search terms to identify PubMed-listed clinical research studies on robotic stone surgery. All authors screened the results for eligibility and two independent reviewers performed the data extraction. Results: The most common approach in robotic stone surgery is a robot-assisted pyelolithotomy using the da Vinci™ system (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Several studies show this technique to be comparable to classic laparoscopic and open surgical interventions. One study that focused on ureteric stones showed a similar result. In recent years, promising data on robotic intrarenal surgery have been reported (Roboflex Avicenna™; Elmed Medical Systems, Ankara, Turkey). Initial studies have shown its feasibility and high stone-free rates and prove that this novel endoscopic approach is safe for the patient and comfortable for the surgeon. Conclusions: The benefits of robotic devices in stone surgery in existing endourological, laparoscopic, and open treatment strategies still need elucidation. Although recent data are promising, more prospective randomised controlled studies are necessary to clarify the impact of this technique on patient safety and stone-free rates. Keywords: Robotic stone surgery, Urolithiasis, Nephrolithiasis, Stone disease, Endourology
format	article
author	Philippe F. Müller Daniel Schlager Simon Hein Christian Bach Arkadiusz Miernik Dominik S. Schoeb
author_facet	Philippe F. Müller Daniel Schlager Simon Hein Christian Bach Arkadiusz Miernik Dominik S. Schoeb
author_sort	Philippe F. Müller
title	Robotic stone surgery – Current state and future prospects: A systematic review
title_short	Robotic stone surgery – Current state and future prospects: A systematic review
title_full	Robotic stone surgery – Current state and future prospects: A systematic review
title_fullStr	Robotic stone surgery – Current state and future prospects: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed	Robotic stone surgery – Current state and future prospects: A systematic review
title_sort	robotic stone surgery – current state and future prospects: a systematic review
publisher	Taylor & Francis Group
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/4c1466edb9324e6cb62aad0eaf447260
work_keys_str_mv	AT philippefmuller roboticstonesurgerycurrentstateandfutureprospectsasystematicreview AT danielschlager roboticstonesurgerycurrentstateandfutureprospectsasystematicreview AT simonhein roboticstonesurgerycurrentstateandfutureprospectsasystematicreview AT christianbach roboticstonesurgerycurrentstateandfutureprospectsasystematicreview AT arkadiuszmiernik roboticstonesurgerycurrentstateandfutureprospectsasystematicreview AT dominiksschoeb roboticstonesurgerycurrentstateandfutureprospectsasystematicreview
_version_	1718397281443512320

Robotic stone surgery – Current state and future prospects: A systematic review

Ejemplares similares