Disability, pain, and wound-specific concerns self-reported by adults at risk of limb loss: A cross-sectional study using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.
<h4>Introduction</h4>There has been limited study of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients at risk of limb loss. Our primary objective was to estimate the prevalence of disability in this patient population using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WH...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN |
| Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/4c2694be0a87455b9e29d5cfd3642e6c |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:4c2694be0a87455b9e29d5cfd3642e6c |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:4c2694be0a87455b9e29d5cfd3642e6c2021-12-02T20:10:38ZDisability, pain, and wound-specific concerns self-reported by adults at risk of limb loss: A cross-sectional study using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0253288https://doaj.org/article/4c2694be0a87455b9e29d5cfd3642e6c2021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253288https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Introduction</h4>There has been limited study of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients at risk of limb loss. Our primary objective was to estimate the prevalence of disability in this patient population using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>We recruited patients referred to a limb-preservation clinic. Patients self-reported their disability status using the 12-domain WHODAS 2.0. Severity of disability in each domain was scored from 1 = none to 5 = extreme and the total normalized to a 100-point scale (total score ≥25 = clinically significant disability). We also asked patients about wound-specific concerns and wound-related discomfort or distress.<h4>Results</h4>We included 162 patients. Reasons for clinic referral included arterial-insufficient (37.4%), postoperative (25.9%), and mixed etiology (10.8%) wounds. The mean WHODAS 2.0 disability score was 35.0 (standard deviation = 16.0). One-hundred-and-nineteen (73.5%) patients had clinically significant disability. Patients reported they had the greatest difficulty walking a long distance (mean score = 4.2), standing for long periods of time (mean score = 3.6), taking care of household responsibilities (mean score = 2.7), and dealing with the emotional impact of their health problems (mean score = 2.5). In the two-weeks prior to presentation, 87 (52.7%) patients expressed concern over their wound(s) and 90 (55.6%) suffered a moderate amount or great deal of wound-related discomfort or distress. In adjusted ordinary least squares regression models, although WHODAS 2.0 disability scores varied with changes in wound volume (p = 0.03) and total revised photographic wound assessment tool scores (p<0.001), the largest decrease in disability severity was seen in patients with less wound-specific concerns and wound-related discomfort and distress.<h4>Discussion</h4>The majority of people at risk of limb loss report suffering a substantial burden of disability, pain, and wound-specific concerns. Research is needed to further evaluate the WHODAS 2.0 in a multicenter fashion among these patients and determine whether care and interventions may improve their PROs.Derek J RobertsSudhir K NagpalAlan J ForsterTimothy BrandysChristine MurphyAlison JenningsShira A StraussEvgeniya VishnyakovaJulie LawsonDaniel I McIsaacPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 6, p e0253288 (2021) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN |
| topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
| spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Derek J Roberts Sudhir K Nagpal Alan J Forster Timothy Brandys Christine Murphy Alison Jennings Shira A Strauss Evgeniya Vishnyakova Julie Lawson Daniel I McIsaac Disability, pain, and wound-specific concerns self-reported by adults at risk of limb loss: A cross-sectional study using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. |
| description |
<h4>Introduction</h4>There has been limited study of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients at risk of limb loss. Our primary objective was to estimate the prevalence of disability in this patient population using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0).<h4>Materials and methods</h4>We recruited patients referred to a limb-preservation clinic. Patients self-reported their disability status using the 12-domain WHODAS 2.0. Severity of disability in each domain was scored from 1 = none to 5 = extreme and the total normalized to a 100-point scale (total score ≥25 = clinically significant disability). We also asked patients about wound-specific concerns and wound-related discomfort or distress.<h4>Results</h4>We included 162 patients. Reasons for clinic referral included arterial-insufficient (37.4%), postoperative (25.9%), and mixed etiology (10.8%) wounds. The mean WHODAS 2.0 disability score was 35.0 (standard deviation = 16.0). One-hundred-and-nineteen (73.5%) patients had clinically significant disability. Patients reported they had the greatest difficulty walking a long distance (mean score = 4.2), standing for long periods of time (mean score = 3.6), taking care of household responsibilities (mean score = 2.7), and dealing with the emotional impact of their health problems (mean score = 2.5). In the two-weeks prior to presentation, 87 (52.7%) patients expressed concern over their wound(s) and 90 (55.6%) suffered a moderate amount or great deal of wound-related discomfort or distress. In adjusted ordinary least squares regression models, although WHODAS 2.0 disability scores varied with changes in wound volume (p = 0.03) and total revised photographic wound assessment tool scores (p<0.001), the largest decrease in disability severity was seen in patients with less wound-specific concerns and wound-related discomfort and distress.<h4>Discussion</h4>The majority of people at risk of limb loss report suffering a substantial burden of disability, pain, and wound-specific concerns. Research is needed to further evaluate the WHODAS 2.0 in a multicenter fashion among these patients and determine whether care and interventions may improve their PROs. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Derek J Roberts Sudhir K Nagpal Alan J Forster Timothy Brandys Christine Murphy Alison Jennings Shira A Strauss Evgeniya Vishnyakova Julie Lawson Daniel I McIsaac |
| author_facet |
Derek J Roberts Sudhir K Nagpal Alan J Forster Timothy Brandys Christine Murphy Alison Jennings Shira A Strauss Evgeniya Vishnyakova Julie Lawson Daniel I McIsaac |
| author_sort |
Derek J Roberts |
| title |
Disability, pain, and wound-specific concerns self-reported by adults at risk of limb loss: A cross-sectional study using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. |
| title_short |
Disability, pain, and wound-specific concerns self-reported by adults at risk of limb loss: A cross-sectional study using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. |
| title_full |
Disability, pain, and wound-specific concerns self-reported by adults at risk of limb loss: A cross-sectional study using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. |
| title_fullStr |
Disability, pain, and wound-specific concerns self-reported by adults at risk of limb loss: A cross-sectional study using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Disability, pain, and wound-specific concerns self-reported by adults at risk of limb loss: A cross-sectional study using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. |
| title_sort |
disability, pain, and wound-specific concerns self-reported by adults at risk of limb loss: a cross-sectional study using the world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. |
| publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/4c2694be0a87455b9e29d5cfd3642e6c |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT derekjroberts disabilitypainandwoundspecificconcernsselfreportedbyadultsatriskoflimblossacrosssectionalstudyusingtheworldhealthorganizationdisabilityassessmentschedule20 AT sudhirknagpal disabilitypainandwoundspecificconcernsselfreportedbyadultsatriskoflimblossacrosssectionalstudyusingtheworldhealthorganizationdisabilityassessmentschedule20 AT alanjforster disabilitypainandwoundspecificconcernsselfreportedbyadultsatriskoflimblossacrosssectionalstudyusingtheworldhealthorganizationdisabilityassessmentschedule20 AT timothybrandys disabilitypainandwoundspecificconcernsselfreportedbyadultsatriskoflimblossacrosssectionalstudyusingtheworldhealthorganizationdisabilityassessmentschedule20 AT christinemurphy disabilitypainandwoundspecificconcernsselfreportedbyadultsatriskoflimblossacrosssectionalstudyusingtheworldhealthorganizationdisabilityassessmentschedule20 AT alisonjennings disabilitypainandwoundspecificconcernsselfreportedbyadultsatriskoflimblossacrosssectionalstudyusingtheworldhealthorganizationdisabilityassessmentschedule20 AT shiraastrauss disabilitypainandwoundspecificconcernsselfreportedbyadultsatriskoflimblossacrosssectionalstudyusingtheworldhealthorganizationdisabilityassessmentschedule20 AT evgeniyavishnyakova disabilitypainandwoundspecificconcernsselfreportedbyadultsatriskoflimblossacrosssectionalstudyusingtheworldhealthorganizationdisabilityassessmentschedule20 AT julielawson disabilitypainandwoundspecificconcernsselfreportedbyadultsatriskoflimblossacrosssectionalstudyusingtheworldhealthorganizationdisabilityassessmentschedule20 AT danielimcisaac disabilitypainandwoundspecificconcernsselfreportedbyadultsatriskoflimblossacrosssectionalstudyusingtheworldhealthorganizationdisabilityassessmentschedule20 |
| _version_ |
1718374943562924032 |