Polemical Reflections about the Possibility of Controversy in Contemporary Philosophy

On the question whether the controversy in the field of philosophy in our time, the author responds negatively, for the following reasons: in the early ages of the real clash of interests could not be, because all the philosophers were inside understanding integrity of the world and their teaching i...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Milan Uzelaz
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	MGIMO University Press 2012
Materias:	dialogue pluralism relativity postgegelevsky period the phenomenology of husserl antagonism of modern science and philosophy International relations JZ2-6530
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/4c2afe00a3784d67b364625a9eda732a
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:4c2afe00a3784d67b364625a9eda732a
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:4c2afe00a3784d67b364625a9eda732a2021-11-23T14:50:51ZPolemical Reflections about the Possibility of Controversy in Contemporary Philosophy2071-81602541-909910.24833/2071-8160-2012-6-27-213-215https://doaj.org/article/4c2afe00a3784d67b364625a9eda732a2012-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/1646https://doaj.org/toc/2071-8160https://doaj.org/toc/2541-9099On the question whether the controversy in the field of philosophy in our time, the author responds negatively, for the following reasons: in the early ages of the real clash of interests could not be, because all the philosophers were inside understanding integrity of the world and their teaching is not consistent; today's thinkers have no more idea of the world that they could unify and give them a uniform basis for the formation of speculative concepts.Milan UzelazMGIMO University Pressarticledialoguepluralismrelativitypostgegelevsky periodthe phenomenology of husserlantagonism of modern science and philosophyInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, Vol 0, Iss 6(27), Pp 213-215 (2012)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	dialogue pluralism relativity postgegelevsky period the phenomenology of husserl antagonism of modern science and philosophy International relations JZ2-6530
spellingShingle	dialogue pluralism relativity postgegelevsky period the phenomenology of husserl antagonism of modern science and philosophy International relations JZ2-6530 Milan Uzelaz Polemical Reflections about the Possibility of Controversy in Contemporary Philosophy
description	On the question whether the controversy in the field of philosophy in our time, the author responds negatively, for the following reasons: in the early ages of the real clash of interests could not be, because all the philosophers were inside understanding integrity of the world and their teaching is not consistent; today's thinkers have no more idea of the world that they could unify and give them a uniform basis for the formation of speculative concepts.
format	article
author	Milan Uzelaz
author_facet	Milan Uzelaz
author_sort	Milan Uzelaz
title	Polemical Reflections about the Possibility of Controversy in Contemporary Philosophy
title_short	Polemical Reflections about the Possibility of Controversy in Contemporary Philosophy
title_full	Polemical Reflections about the Possibility of Controversy in Contemporary Philosophy
title_fullStr	Polemical Reflections about the Possibility of Controversy in Contemporary Philosophy
title_full_unstemmed	Polemical Reflections about the Possibility of Controversy in Contemporary Philosophy
title_sort	polemical reflections about the possibility of controversy in contemporary philosophy
publisher	MGIMO University Press
publishDate	2012
url	https://doaj.org/article/4c2afe00a3784d67b364625a9eda732a
work_keys_str_mv	AT milanuzelaz polemicalreflectionsaboutthepossibilityofcontroversyincontemporaryphilosophy
_version_	1718416454467977216

Polemical Reflections about the Possibility of Controversy in Contemporary Philosophy

Ejemplares similares