Real-time streamflow forecasting: AI vs. Hydrologic insights
In this paper, we propose a set of simple benchmarks for the evaluation of data-based models for real-time streamflow forecasting, such as those developed with sophisticated Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms. The benchmarks are also data-based and provide context to judge incremental improveme...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/4c2cfbdae0dd4b09a187c30eb60680c1 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:4c2cfbdae0dd4b09a187c30eb60680c1 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:4c2cfbdae0dd4b09a187c30eb60680c12021-11-30T04:17:31ZReal-time streamflow forecasting: AI vs. Hydrologic insights2589-915510.1016/j.hydroa.2021.100110https://doaj.org/article/4c2cfbdae0dd4b09a187c30eb60680c12021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589915521000389https://doaj.org/toc/2589-9155In this paper, we propose a set of simple benchmarks for the evaluation of data-based models for real-time streamflow forecasting, such as those developed with sophisticated Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms. The benchmarks are also data-based and provide context to judge incremental improvements in the performance metrics from the more complicated approaches. The benchmarks include temporal and spatial persistence, persistence corrected for baseflow and streamflow, as well as river distance weighted runoff obtained from space-time distributed rainfall. In the development of the benchmarks, we use basic hydrologic insights such as flow aggregation by the river network, scale-dependence in basin response, streamflow partitioning into quick flow and baseflow, water travel time, and rainfall averaging by the basin width function. The study uses 140 streamflow gauges in Iowa that cover a range of basin scales between 7 and 37,000 km2. The data cover 17 years. This work demonstrates that the proposed benchmarks can provide good performance according to several commonly used metrics. For example, streamflow forecasting at half of the test locations across years achieves a Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) score of 0.6 or higher at one-day ahead lead time, and 20% of cases reach the KGE of 0.8 or higher. The proposed benchmarks are easy to implement and should prove useful for developers of data-based as well as physics-based hydrologic models and real-time data assimilation techniques.Witold F. KrajewskiGanesh R. GhimireIbrahim DemirRicardo MantillaElsevierarticleReal-time streamflow forecastingArtificial intelligenceHydrologic insightsBenchmarkingPersistenceIowaEnvironmental engineeringTA170-171Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENJournal of Hydrology X, Vol 13, Iss , Pp 100110- (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Real-time streamflow forecasting Artificial intelligence Hydrologic insights Benchmarking Persistence Iowa Environmental engineering TA170-171 Environmental sciences GE1-350 |
spellingShingle |
Real-time streamflow forecasting Artificial intelligence Hydrologic insights Benchmarking Persistence Iowa Environmental engineering TA170-171 Environmental sciences GE1-350 Witold F. Krajewski Ganesh R. Ghimire Ibrahim Demir Ricardo Mantilla Real-time streamflow forecasting: AI vs. Hydrologic insights |
description |
In this paper, we propose a set of simple benchmarks for the evaluation of data-based models for real-time streamflow forecasting, such as those developed with sophisticated Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms. The benchmarks are also data-based and provide context to judge incremental improvements in the performance metrics from the more complicated approaches. The benchmarks include temporal and spatial persistence, persistence corrected for baseflow and streamflow, as well as river distance weighted runoff obtained from space-time distributed rainfall. In the development of the benchmarks, we use basic hydrologic insights such as flow aggregation by the river network, scale-dependence in basin response, streamflow partitioning into quick flow and baseflow, water travel time, and rainfall averaging by the basin width function. The study uses 140 streamflow gauges in Iowa that cover a range of basin scales between 7 and 37,000 km2. The data cover 17 years. This work demonstrates that the proposed benchmarks can provide good performance according to several commonly used metrics. For example, streamflow forecasting at half of the test locations across years achieves a Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) score of 0.6 or higher at one-day ahead lead time, and 20% of cases reach the KGE of 0.8 or higher. The proposed benchmarks are easy to implement and should prove useful for developers of data-based as well as physics-based hydrologic models and real-time data assimilation techniques. |
format |
article |
author |
Witold F. Krajewski Ganesh R. Ghimire Ibrahim Demir Ricardo Mantilla |
author_facet |
Witold F. Krajewski Ganesh R. Ghimire Ibrahim Demir Ricardo Mantilla |
author_sort |
Witold F. Krajewski |
title |
Real-time streamflow forecasting: AI vs. Hydrologic insights |
title_short |
Real-time streamflow forecasting: AI vs. Hydrologic insights |
title_full |
Real-time streamflow forecasting: AI vs. Hydrologic insights |
title_fullStr |
Real-time streamflow forecasting: AI vs. Hydrologic insights |
title_full_unstemmed |
Real-time streamflow forecasting: AI vs. Hydrologic insights |
title_sort |
real-time streamflow forecasting: ai vs. hydrologic insights |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/4c2cfbdae0dd4b09a187c30eb60680c1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT witoldfkrajewski realtimestreamflowforecastingaivshydrologicinsights AT ganeshrghimire realtimestreamflowforecastingaivshydrologicinsights AT ibrahimdemir realtimestreamflowforecastingaivshydrologicinsights AT ricardomantilla realtimestreamflowforecastingaivshydrologicinsights |
_version_ |
1718406741757001728 |