The Practice of Russian Conservatism of the Nineteenth and early Twentieth Centuries

Russian conservatism as a current social thought, consistently turned into political action is formed at the turn of the XVIII-XIX centuries. The goal of its constant aspirations and efforts was creative protection that meant adaptation, modernization, development of the historical Russian autocracy...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	M. M. Shevchenko
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”) 2018
Materias:	conservatism russia autocracy monarchy liberalism nationalism International relations JZ2-6530
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/4c3b797980864639a29a3ed92bb8b6d3
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:4c3b797980864639a29a3ed92bb8b6d3
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:4c3b797980864639a29a3ed92bb8b6d32021-11-07T14:45:01ZThe Practice of Russian Conservatism of the Nineteenth and early Twentieth Centuries2542-02402587-932410.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-6-44-64https://doaj.org/article/4c3b797980864639a29a3ed92bb8b6d32018-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/258https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324Russian conservatism as a current social thought, consistently turned into political action is formed at the turn of the XVIII-XIX centuries. The goal of its constant aspirations and efforts was creative protection that meant adaptation, modernization, development of the historical Russian autocracy as a response to the liberal-egalitarian challenges of the time. N.M. Karamzin, who went through the accumulation, comprehension and generalization of the empirics of domestic historical experience, developed a system of apology for an autocratic monarchy, which, combined with the atmosphere of the patriotic upsurge of 1812, led to the abolition of the liberal political agenda initiated by Alexander I. The era of Nicholas I was the longest experience of a stable and progressive conservative domestic and foreign policy that ended with the death of her symbol and realizer because of the accumulated contradictions, mistakes and omissions that destroyed her prestige in Russian public opinion. The policy of the liberation reforms of Alexander II in the short term strengthened the autocracy, but in the long term generated social and political dynamism that bore the constant threat of its fall with catastrophic consequences for Russia as a whole. The conservative turn of Alexander III was an imperfect attempt, without losing the prospect of economic progress and the consolidation of the Russian great power in the rapidly changing world of modernity, to take the path of long-term sociopolitical stabilization. After the defeat in the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905, which resulted from both the grave strategic mistake of Nicholas II and the uncorrected systemic errors of his predecessors, the discrediting of the autocracy took an avalanche character.M. M. ShevchenkoАссоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)articleconservatismrussiaautocracymonarchyliberalismnationalismInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUКонтуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право, Vol 10, Iss 6, Pp 44-64 (2018)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	conservatism russia autocracy monarchy liberalism nationalism International relations JZ2-6530
spellingShingle	conservatism russia autocracy monarchy liberalism nationalism International relations JZ2-6530 M. M. Shevchenko The Practice of Russian Conservatism of the Nineteenth and early Twentieth Centuries
description	Russian conservatism as a current social thought, consistently turned into political action is formed at the turn of the XVIII-XIX centuries. The goal of its constant aspirations and efforts was creative protection that meant adaptation, modernization, development of the historical Russian autocracy as a response to the liberal-egalitarian challenges of the time. N.M. Karamzin, who went through the accumulation, comprehension and generalization of the empirics of domestic historical experience, developed a system of apology for an autocratic monarchy, which, combined with the atmosphere of the patriotic upsurge of 1812, led to the abolition of the liberal political agenda initiated by Alexander I. The era of Nicholas I was the longest experience of a stable and progressive conservative domestic and foreign policy that ended with the death of her symbol and realizer because of the accumulated contradictions, mistakes and omissions that destroyed her prestige in Russian public opinion. The policy of the liberation reforms of Alexander II in the short term strengthened the autocracy, but in the long term generated social and political dynamism that bore the constant threat of its fall with catastrophic consequences for Russia as a whole. The conservative turn of Alexander III was an imperfect attempt, without losing the prospect of economic progress and the consolidation of the Russian great power in the rapidly changing world of modernity, to take the path of long-term sociopolitical stabilization. After the defeat in the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905, which resulted from both the grave strategic mistake of Nicholas II and the uncorrected systemic errors of his predecessors, the discrediting of the autocracy took an avalanche character.
format	article
author	M. M. Shevchenko
author_facet	M. M. Shevchenko
author_sort	M. M. Shevchenko
title	The Practice of Russian Conservatism of the Nineteenth and early Twentieth Centuries
title_short	The Practice of Russian Conservatism of the Nineteenth and early Twentieth Centuries
title_full	The Practice of Russian Conservatism of the Nineteenth and early Twentieth Centuries
title_fullStr	The Practice of Russian Conservatism of the Nineteenth and early Twentieth Centuries
title_full_unstemmed	The Practice of Russian Conservatism of the Nineteenth and early Twentieth Centuries
title_sort	practice of russian conservatism of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries
publisher	Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)
publishDate	2018
url	https://doaj.org/article/4c3b797980864639a29a3ed92bb8b6d3
work_keys_str_mv	AT mmshevchenko thepracticeofrussianconservatismofthenineteenthandearlytwentiethcenturies AT mmshevchenko practiceofrussianconservatismofthenineteenthandearlytwentiethcenturies
_version_	1718443417488326656

The Practice of Russian Conservatism of the Nineteenth and early Twentieth Centuries

Ejemplares similares