Leaf Apoplast of Field-Grown Potato Analyzed by Quantitative Proteomics and Activity-Based Protein Profiling

Multiple biotic and abiotic stresses challenge plants growing in agricultural fields. Most molecular studies have aimed to understand plant responses to challenges under controlled conditions. However, studies on field-grown plants are scarce, limiting application of the findings in agricultural con...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kibrom B. Abreha, Erik Alexandersson, Svante Resjö, Åsa Lankinen, Daniela Sueldo, Farnusch Kaschani, Markus Kaiser, Renier A. L. van der Hoorn, Fredrik Levander, Erik Andreasson
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4c5521147f00474d8b9d88ab663b36e3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4c5521147f00474d8b9d88ab663b36e3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4c5521147f00474d8b9d88ab663b36e32021-11-11T17:26:00ZLeaf Apoplast of Field-Grown Potato Analyzed by Quantitative Proteomics and Activity-Based Protein Profiling10.3390/ijms2221120331422-00671661-6596https://doaj.org/article/4c5521147f00474d8b9d88ab663b36e32021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/21/12033https://doaj.org/toc/1661-6596https://doaj.org/toc/1422-0067Multiple biotic and abiotic stresses challenge plants growing in agricultural fields. Most molecular studies have aimed to understand plant responses to challenges under controlled conditions. However, studies on field-grown plants are scarce, limiting application of the findings in agricultural conditions. In this study, we investigated the composition of apoplastic proteomes of potato cultivar Bintje grown under field conditions, i.e., two field sites in June–August across two years and fungicide treated and untreated, using quantitative proteomics, as well as its activity using activity-based protein profiling (ABPP). Samples were clustered and some proteins showed significant intensity and activity differences, based on their field site and sampling time (June–August), indicating differential regulation of certain proteins in response to environmental or developmental factors. Peroxidases, class II chitinases, pectinesterases, and osmotins were among the proteins more abundant later in the growing season (July–August) as compared to early in the season (June). We did not detect significant differences between fungicide Shirlan treated and untreated field samples in two growing seasons. Using ABPP, we showed differential activity of serine hydrolases and β-glycosidases under greenhouse and field conditions and across a growing season. Furthermore, the activity of serine hydrolases and β-glycosidases, including proteins related to biotic stress tolerance, decreased as the season progressed. The generated proteomics data would facilitate further studies aiming at understanding mechanisms of molecular plant physiology in agricultural fields and help applying effective strategies to mitigate biotic and abiotic stresses.Kibrom B. AbrehaErik AlexanderssonSvante ResjöÅsa LankinenDaniela SueldoFarnusch KaschaniMarkus KaiserRenier A. L. van der HoornFredrik LevanderErik AndreassonMDPI AGarticleABPPapoplastproteomicsserine hydrolasesβ-glycosidasespotatoBiology (General)QH301-705.5ChemistryQD1-999ENInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, Vol 22, Iss 12033, p 12033 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic ABPP
apoplast
proteomics
serine hydrolases
β-glycosidases
potato
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Chemistry
QD1-999
spellingShingle ABPP
apoplast
proteomics
serine hydrolases
β-glycosidases
potato
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Chemistry
QD1-999
Kibrom B. Abreha
Erik Alexandersson
Svante Resjö
Åsa Lankinen
Daniela Sueldo
Farnusch Kaschani
Markus Kaiser
Renier A. L. van der Hoorn
Fredrik Levander
Erik Andreasson
Leaf Apoplast of Field-Grown Potato Analyzed by Quantitative Proteomics and Activity-Based Protein Profiling
description Multiple biotic and abiotic stresses challenge plants growing in agricultural fields. Most molecular studies have aimed to understand plant responses to challenges under controlled conditions. However, studies on field-grown plants are scarce, limiting application of the findings in agricultural conditions. In this study, we investigated the composition of apoplastic proteomes of potato cultivar Bintje grown under field conditions, i.e., two field sites in June–August across two years and fungicide treated and untreated, using quantitative proteomics, as well as its activity using activity-based protein profiling (ABPP). Samples were clustered and some proteins showed significant intensity and activity differences, based on their field site and sampling time (June–August), indicating differential regulation of certain proteins in response to environmental or developmental factors. Peroxidases, class II chitinases, pectinesterases, and osmotins were among the proteins more abundant later in the growing season (July–August) as compared to early in the season (June). We did not detect significant differences between fungicide Shirlan treated and untreated field samples in two growing seasons. Using ABPP, we showed differential activity of serine hydrolases and β-glycosidases under greenhouse and field conditions and across a growing season. Furthermore, the activity of serine hydrolases and β-glycosidases, including proteins related to biotic stress tolerance, decreased as the season progressed. The generated proteomics data would facilitate further studies aiming at understanding mechanisms of molecular plant physiology in agricultural fields and help applying effective strategies to mitigate biotic and abiotic stresses.
format article
author Kibrom B. Abreha
Erik Alexandersson
Svante Resjö
Åsa Lankinen
Daniela Sueldo
Farnusch Kaschani
Markus Kaiser
Renier A. L. van der Hoorn
Fredrik Levander
Erik Andreasson
author_facet Kibrom B. Abreha
Erik Alexandersson
Svante Resjö
Åsa Lankinen
Daniela Sueldo
Farnusch Kaschani
Markus Kaiser
Renier A. L. van der Hoorn
Fredrik Levander
Erik Andreasson
author_sort Kibrom B. Abreha
title Leaf Apoplast of Field-Grown Potato Analyzed by Quantitative Proteomics and Activity-Based Protein Profiling
title_short Leaf Apoplast of Field-Grown Potato Analyzed by Quantitative Proteomics and Activity-Based Protein Profiling
title_full Leaf Apoplast of Field-Grown Potato Analyzed by Quantitative Proteomics and Activity-Based Protein Profiling
title_fullStr Leaf Apoplast of Field-Grown Potato Analyzed by Quantitative Proteomics and Activity-Based Protein Profiling
title_full_unstemmed Leaf Apoplast of Field-Grown Potato Analyzed by Quantitative Proteomics and Activity-Based Protein Profiling
title_sort leaf apoplast of field-grown potato analyzed by quantitative proteomics and activity-based protein profiling
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/4c5521147f00474d8b9d88ab663b36e3
work_keys_str_mv AT kibrombabreha leafapoplastoffieldgrownpotatoanalyzedbyquantitativeproteomicsandactivitybasedproteinprofiling
AT erikalexandersson leafapoplastoffieldgrownpotatoanalyzedbyquantitativeproteomicsandactivitybasedproteinprofiling
AT svanteresjo leafapoplastoffieldgrownpotatoanalyzedbyquantitativeproteomicsandactivitybasedproteinprofiling
AT asalankinen leafapoplastoffieldgrownpotatoanalyzedbyquantitativeproteomicsandactivitybasedproteinprofiling
AT danielasueldo leafapoplastoffieldgrownpotatoanalyzedbyquantitativeproteomicsandactivitybasedproteinprofiling
AT farnuschkaschani leafapoplastoffieldgrownpotatoanalyzedbyquantitativeproteomicsandactivitybasedproteinprofiling
AT markuskaiser leafapoplastoffieldgrownpotatoanalyzedbyquantitativeproteomicsandactivitybasedproteinprofiling
AT renieralvanderhoorn leafapoplastoffieldgrownpotatoanalyzedbyquantitativeproteomicsandactivitybasedproteinprofiling
AT fredriklevander leafapoplastoffieldgrownpotatoanalyzedbyquantitativeproteomicsandactivitybasedproteinprofiling
AT erikandreasson leafapoplastoffieldgrownpotatoanalyzedbyquantitativeproteomicsandactivitybasedproteinprofiling
_version_ 1718432060803121152