Using self-determination theory to understand and improve recruitment for the Coaching for Healthy Ageing (CHAnGE) trial
<h4>Background</h4> Intervention trials promoting physical activity among older people frequently report low and unrepresentative recruitment. Better understanding of reasons for participation can help improve recruitment. This study explored why participants enrolled in the Coaching for...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/4c691d1e6e78475e84f9360b76271bc3 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:4c691d1e6e78475e84f9360b76271bc3 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:4c691d1e6e78475e84f9360b76271bc32021-11-25T06:19:33ZUsing self-determination theory to understand and improve recruitment for the Coaching for Healthy Ageing (CHAnGE) trial1932-6203https://doaj.org/article/4c691d1e6e78475e84f9360b76271bc32021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8604286/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4> Intervention trials promoting physical activity among older people frequently report low and unrepresentative recruitment. Better understanding of reasons for participation can help improve recruitment. This study explored why participants enrolled in the Coaching for Healthy Ageing (CHAnGE) trial, including how their decision was influenced by recruitment strategies. CHAnGE was a cluster randomised controlled trial testing the effectiveness of a healthy ageing program targeting inactivity and falls. Seventy-two groups of people aged 60+ were recruited from community organisations via informal presentations by the health coaches. <h4>Methods</h4> We conducted a secondary thematic analysis of interview data from our wider qualitative evaluation in which 32 purposively sampled trial participants took part in semi-structured interviews about their experiences of CHAnGE. Data relating to recruitment and participation were analysed inductively to identify themes, then a coding framework comprising the core constructs from self-determination theory—autonomy, competence and relatedness—was used to explore if and how this theory fit with and helped to explain our data. <h4>Results</h4> Recruitment presentations promoted the CHAnGE intervention well in terms of addressing value expectations of structured support, different forms of accountability, credibility, achievability and, for some, a potential to enhance social relationships. Participation was motivated by the desire for improved health and decelerated ageing, altruism and curiosity. These factors related strongly to self-determination concepts of autonomy, competence and relatedness, but the intervention’s demonstrated potential to support self-determination needs could be conveyed more effectively. <h4>Conclusions</h4> Findings suggest that recruitment could have greater reach using: 1. Strengths-based messaging focusing on holistic gains, 2. Participant stories that highlight positive experiences, and 3. Peer support and information sharing to leverage altruism and curiosity. These theory-informed improvements will be used to increase participation in future trials, including people in hard-to-recruit groups. They may also inform other physical activity trials and community programs.Abby HaynesCatherine SherringtonGeraldine WallbankJames WickhamAllison TongCatherine KirkhamShona ManningElisabeth RamsayAnne TiedemannPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 11 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Abby Haynes Catherine Sherrington Geraldine Wallbank James Wickham Allison Tong Catherine Kirkham Shona Manning Elisabeth Ramsay Anne Tiedemann Using self-determination theory to understand and improve recruitment for the Coaching for Healthy Ageing (CHAnGE) trial |
description |
<h4>Background</h4> Intervention trials promoting physical activity among older people frequently report low and unrepresentative recruitment. Better understanding of reasons for participation can help improve recruitment. This study explored why participants enrolled in the Coaching for Healthy Ageing (CHAnGE) trial, including how their decision was influenced by recruitment strategies. CHAnGE was a cluster randomised controlled trial testing the effectiveness of a healthy ageing program targeting inactivity and falls. Seventy-two groups of people aged 60+ were recruited from community organisations via informal presentations by the health coaches. <h4>Methods</h4> We conducted a secondary thematic analysis of interview data from our wider qualitative evaluation in which 32 purposively sampled trial participants took part in semi-structured interviews about their experiences of CHAnGE. Data relating to recruitment and participation were analysed inductively to identify themes, then a coding framework comprising the core constructs from self-determination theory—autonomy, competence and relatedness—was used to explore if and how this theory fit with and helped to explain our data. <h4>Results</h4> Recruitment presentations promoted the CHAnGE intervention well in terms of addressing value expectations of structured support, different forms of accountability, credibility, achievability and, for some, a potential to enhance social relationships. Participation was motivated by the desire for improved health and decelerated ageing, altruism and curiosity. These factors related strongly to self-determination concepts of autonomy, competence and relatedness, but the intervention’s demonstrated potential to support self-determination needs could be conveyed more effectively. <h4>Conclusions</h4> Findings suggest that recruitment could have greater reach using: 1. Strengths-based messaging focusing on holistic gains, 2. Participant stories that highlight positive experiences, and 3. Peer support and information sharing to leverage altruism and curiosity. These theory-informed improvements will be used to increase participation in future trials, including people in hard-to-recruit groups. They may also inform other physical activity trials and community programs. |
format |
article |
author |
Abby Haynes Catherine Sherrington Geraldine Wallbank James Wickham Allison Tong Catherine Kirkham Shona Manning Elisabeth Ramsay Anne Tiedemann |
author_facet |
Abby Haynes Catherine Sherrington Geraldine Wallbank James Wickham Allison Tong Catherine Kirkham Shona Manning Elisabeth Ramsay Anne Tiedemann |
author_sort |
Abby Haynes |
title |
Using self-determination theory to understand and improve recruitment for the Coaching for Healthy Ageing (CHAnGE) trial |
title_short |
Using self-determination theory to understand and improve recruitment for the Coaching for Healthy Ageing (CHAnGE) trial |
title_full |
Using self-determination theory to understand and improve recruitment for the Coaching for Healthy Ageing (CHAnGE) trial |
title_fullStr |
Using self-determination theory to understand and improve recruitment for the Coaching for Healthy Ageing (CHAnGE) trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Using self-determination theory to understand and improve recruitment for the Coaching for Healthy Ageing (CHAnGE) trial |
title_sort |
using self-determination theory to understand and improve recruitment for the coaching for healthy ageing (change) trial |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/4c691d1e6e78475e84f9360b76271bc3 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT abbyhaynes usingselfdeterminationtheorytounderstandandimproverecruitmentforthecoachingforhealthyageingchangetrial AT catherinesherrington usingselfdeterminationtheorytounderstandandimproverecruitmentforthecoachingforhealthyageingchangetrial AT geraldinewallbank usingselfdeterminationtheorytounderstandandimproverecruitmentforthecoachingforhealthyageingchangetrial AT jameswickham usingselfdeterminationtheorytounderstandandimproverecruitmentforthecoachingforhealthyageingchangetrial AT allisontong usingselfdeterminationtheorytounderstandandimproverecruitmentforthecoachingforhealthyageingchangetrial AT catherinekirkham usingselfdeterminationtheorytounderstandandimproverecruitmentforthecoachingforhealthyageingchangetrial AT shonamanning usingselfdeterminationtheorytounderstandandimproverecruitmentforthecoachingforhealthyageingchangetrial AT elisabethramsay usingselfdeterminationtheorytounderstandandimproverecruitmentforthecoachingforhealthyageingchangetrial AT annetiedemann usingselfdeterminationtheorytounderstandandimproverecruitmentforthecoachingforhealthyageingchangetrial |
_version_ |
1718413861530370048 |