DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF RESISTIVE INDEX IN DOPPLER IMAGING IN DIAGNOSING MALIGNANT AND BENIGN ADNEXAL MASSES

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of resistive index in Doppler Imaging in diagnosing benign and malignant adnexal masses, taking Histopathology as Gold standard. Study Design: Prospective observational study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Radiology, Jinnah Hospital,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Nadia Irshad, Ammara Arshad, Zahra Nasrullah
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Army Medical College Rawalpindi 2021
Materias:	doppler imaging diagnostic accuracy resistive index Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/4c85cea35d4c41189393fd2c89ce5f66
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:4c85cea35d4c41189393fd2c89ce5f66
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:4c85cea35d4c41189393fd2c89ce5f662021-12-02T15:13:09ZDIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF RESISTIVE INDEX IN DOPPLER IMAGING IN DIAGNOSING MALIGNANT AND BENIGN ADNEXAL MASSES0030-96482411-8842https://doaj.org/article/4c85cea35d4c41189393fd2c89ce5f662021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/6381https://doaj.org/toc/0030-9648https://doaj.org/toc/2411-8842Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of resistive index in Doppler Imaging in diagnosing benign and malignant adnexal masses, taking Histopathology as Gold standard. Study Design: Prospective observational study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Radiology, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore Pakistan, from Jan to Jun 2018. Methodology: A sample size of 200 patients was calculated using WHO calculator. Patients were selected through non probability consecutive sampling. After taking informed consent and relevant history, trans-abdominal Doppler Ultrasound of the patients with adnexal masses, using 3.5 MHz transducer on Logic 5 GE Doppler Ultrasound machine was performed. The Resistive Index (RI) was calculated in every case and threshold Resistive Index of 0.4 was used to differentiate benign from malignant lesions. Patients were followed after one month. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 24. Post stratification chi-square test was applied. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered significant. Results: Total 200 patients were included in study. Mean age of patients was 40.53 ± 10.54 years. Mean size of lesion was 28.72 ± 11.48 SD. Diagnostic parameters of doppler imaging were sensitivity 91.3%, specificity 90.59%, positive predictive value 92.92% and negative predictive value 88.51%. ROC curve analysis showed 91% diagnostic accuracy of doppler imaging in diagnosing malignant and benign adnexal masses. Conclusion: Resistive index in doppler Imaging is the non-invasive modality of choice with high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign and malignant adnexal masses, and has not only dramatically improved our ability of differentiating benign and malignant adnexal masses pre-operatively but also helps the surgeons for proper decision making.Nadia IrshadAmmara ArshadZahra NasrullahArmy Medical College Rawalpindiarticledoppler imagingdiagnostic accuracyresistive indexMedicineRMedicine (General)R5-920ENPakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal, Vol 71, Iss 1, Pp 343-346 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	doppler imaging diagnostic accuracy resistive index Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	doppler imaging diagnostic accuracy resistive index Medicine R Medicine (General) R5-920 Nadia Irshad Ammara Arshad Zahra Nasrullah DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF RESISTIVE INDEX IN DOPPLER IMAGING IN DIAGNOSING MALIGNANT AND BENIGN ADNEXAL MASSES
description	Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of resistive index in Doppler Imaging in diagnosing benign and malignant adnexal masses, taking Histopathology as Gold standard. Study Design: Prospective observational study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Radiology, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore Pakistan, from Jan to Jun 2018. Methodology: A sample size of 200 patients was calculated using WHO calculator. Patients were selected through non probability consecutive sampling. After taking informed consent and relevant history, trans-abdominal Doppler Ultrasound of the patients with adnexal masses, using 3.5 MHz transducer on Logic 5 GE Doppler Ultrasound machine was performed. The Resistive Index (RI) was calculated in every case and threshold Resistive Index of 0.4 was used to differentiate benign from malignant lesions. Patients were followed after one month. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 24. Post stratification chi-square test was applied. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered significant. Results: Total 200 patients were included in study. Mean age of patients was 40.53 ± 10.54 years. Mean size of lesion was 28.72 ± 11.48 SD. Diagnostic parameters of doppler imaging were sensitivity 91.3%, specificity 90.59%, positive predictive value 92.92% and negative predictive value 88.51%. ROC curve analysis showed 91% diagnostic accuracy of doppler imaging in diagnosing malignant and benign adnexal masses. Conclusion: Resistive index in doppler Imaging is the non-invasive modality of choice with high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign and malignant adnexal masses, and has not only dramatically improved our ability of differentiating benign and malignant adnexal masses pre-operatively but also helps the surgeons for proper decision making.
format	article
author	Nadia Irshad Ammara Arshad Zahra Nasrullah
author_facet	Nadia Irshad Ammara Arshad Zahra Nasrullah
author_sort	Nadia Irshad
title	DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF RESISTIVE INDEX IN DOPPLER IMAGING IN DIAGNOSING MALIGNANT AND BENIGN ADNEXAL MASSES
title_short	DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF RESISTIVE INDEX IN DOPPLER IMAGING IN DIAGNOSING MALIGNANT AND BENIGN ADNEXAL MASSES
title_full	DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF RESISTIVE INDEX IN DOPPLER IMAGING IN DIAGNOSING MALIGNANT AND BENIGN ADNEXAL MASSES
title_fullStr	DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF RESISTIVE INDEX IN DOPPLER IMAGING IN DIAGNOSING MALIGNANT AND BENIGN ADNEXAL MASSES
title_full_unstemmed	DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF RESISTIVE INDEX IN DOPPLER IMAGING IN DIAGNOSING MALIGNANT AND BENIGN ADNEXAL MASSES
title_sort	diagnostic accuracy of resistive index in doppler imaging in diagnosing malignant and benign adnexal masses
publisher	Army Medical College Rawalpindi
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/4c85cea35d4c41189393fd2c89ce5f66
work_keys_str_mv	AT nadiairshad diagnosticaccuracyofresistiveindexindopplerimagingindiagnosingmalignantandbenignadnexalmasses AT ammaraarshad diagnosticaccuracyofresistiveindexindopplerimagingindiagnosingmalignantandbenignadnexalmasses AT zahranasrullah diagnosticaccuracyofresistiveindexindopplerimagingindiagnosingmalignantandbenignadnexalmasses
_version_	1718387566593441792

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF RESISTIVE INDEX IN DOPPLER IMAGING IN DIAGNOSING MALIGNANT AND BENIGN ADNEXAL MASSES

Ejemplares similares