Integrating Ecosystem Services Valuation into Land Use Planning: Case of the Ukrainian Agricultural Landscapes

Modern agricultural landscapes produce multiple ecosystem services. Ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes have social, economic, and environmental value—providing a wide array of benefits to society. Absence of scientifically based and practically tested methodologies of identification, mapp...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ihor Soloviy, Roman Kuryltsiv, Józef Hernik, Nadiia Kryshenyk, Taras Kuleshnyk
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/4cb3dafb74ac4febbb06e85c4438521b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4cb3dafb74ac4febbb06e85c4438521b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4cb3dafb74ac4febbb06e85c4438521b2021-11-25T17:37:33ZIntegrating Ecosystem Services Valuation into Land Use Planning: Case of the Ukrainian Agricultural Landscapes10.3390/f121114651999-4907https://doaj.org/article/4cb3dafb74ac4febbb06e85c4438521b2021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/12/11/1465https://doaj.org/toc/1999-4907Modern agricultural landscapes produce multiple ecosystem services. Ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes have social, economic, and environmental value—providing a wide array of benefits to society. Absence of scientifically based and practically tested methodologies of identification, mapping, and evaluation of ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes hamper integration of its values in the current system of land use planning. The value of ecosystem services is calculated for the case study territory located within the administrative borders of Kolomak Territorial Community in Bohodukhiv district, Kharkiv region (Ukraine). The highest estimated value among non-market ecosystem services is carbon storage service, and among market services—food production. The baseline scenario of land use (business as usual) is compared with two alternative scenarios (Scenario 1. Land reclamation scenario; Scenario 2. Land protection and bioenergy production scenario). Designing of an integrated production system in the forest agro-landscape, which combines multiple ecosystem services, allows us to attain maximum results in terms of value. Amelioration of agricultural landscape through establishing a system of protective forest shelterbelts allows society to increase the total value of ecosystem services, and this is why it should be better integrated into land use planning and land management.Ihor SoloviyRoman KuryltsivJózef HernikNadiia KryshenykTaras KuleshnykMDPI AGarticleecosystem servicesforest meliorationbioenergy plantationsprotective shelterbeltsland use planningland managementPlant ecologyQK900-989ENForests, Vol 12, Iss 1465, p 1465 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic ecosystem services
forest melioration
bioenergy plantations
protective shelterbelts
land use planning
land management
Plant ecology
QK900-989
spellingShingle ecosystem services
forest melioration
bioenergy plantations
protective shelterbelts
land use planning
land management
Plant ecology
QK900-989
Ihor Soloviy
Roman Kuryltsiv
Józef Hernik
Nadiia Kryshenyk
Taras Kuleshnyk
Integrating Ecosystem Services Valuation into Land Use Planning: Case of the Ukrainian Agricultural Landscapes
description Modern agricultural landscapes produce multiple ecosystem services. Ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes have social, economic, and environmental value—providing a wide array of benefits to society. Absence of scientifically based and practically tested methodologies of identification, mapping, and evaluation of ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes hamper integration of its values in the current system of land use planning. The value of ecosystem services is calculated for the case study territory located within the administrative borders of Kolomak Territorial Community in Bohodukhiv district, Kharkiv region (Ukraine). The highest estimated value among non-market ecosystem services is carbon storage service, and among market services—food production. The baseline scenario of land use (business as usual) is compared with two alternative scenarios (Scenario 1. Land reclamation scenario; Scenario 2. Land protection and bioenergy production scenario). Designing of an integrated production system in the forest agro-landscape, which combines multiple ecosystem services, allows us to attain maximum results in terms of value. Amelioration of agricultural landscape through establishing a system of protective forest shelterbelts allows society to increase the total value of ecosystem services, and this is why it should be better integrated into land use planning and land management.
format article
author Ihor Soloviy
Roman Kuryltsiv
Józef Hernik
Nadiia Kryshenyk
Taras Kuleshnyk
author_facet Ihor Soloviy
Roman Kuryltsiv
Józef Hernik
Nadiia Kryshenyk
Taras Kuleshnyk
author_sort Ihor Soloviy
title Integrating Ecosystem Services Valuation into Land Use Planning: Case of the Ukrainian Agricultural Landscapes
title_short Integrating Ecosystem Services Valuation into Land Use Planning: Case of the Ukrainian Agricultural Landscapes
title_full Integrating Ecosystem Services Valuation into Land Use Planning: Case of the Ukrainian Agricultural Landscapes
title_fullStr Integrating Ecosystem Services Valuation into Land Use Planning: Case of the Ukrainian Agricultural Landscapes
title_full_unstemmed Integrating Ecosystem Services Valuation into Land Use Planning: Case of the Ukrainian Agricultural Landscapes
title_sort integrating ecosystem services valuation into land use planning: case of the ukrainian agricultural landscapes
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/4cb3dafb74ac4febbb06e85c4438521b
work_keys_str_mv AT ihorsoloviy integratingecosystemservicesvaluationintolanduseplanningcaseoftheukrainianagriculturallandscapes
AT romankuryltsiv integratingecosystemservicesvaluationintolanduseplanningcaseoftheukrainianagriculturallandscapes
AT jozefhernik integratingecosystemservicesvaluationintolanduseplanningcaseoftheukrainianagriculturallandscapes
AT nadiiakryshenyk integratingecosystemservicesvaluationintolanduseplanningcaseoftheukrainianagriculturallandscapes
AT taraskuleshnyk integratingecosystemservicesvaluationintolanduseplanningcaseoftheukrainianagriculturallandscapes
_version_ 1718412163778871296