Developing and validating an instrument to measure: the medical professionalism climate in clinical settings

This study was conducted to develop and validate an instrument to measure the medical professionalism climate in clinical settings. The item pool was developed based on the Tehran University of Medical Sciences Guideline for Professional Conduct. The items were distributed between two questionnaire...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Fariba Asghari, Zahra Shahvari, Abbas Ebadi, Fateme Alipour, Shahram Samadi, Maryam Bahreini, Homayoun Amini
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:	Professionalism; Clinical setting; Questionnaire; Validation. History of medicine. Medical expeditions R131-687 Medical philosophy. Medical ethics R723-726
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/4cce53caa9c747b48f78a18ebdd8def4
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:4cce53caa9c747b48f78a18ebdd8def4
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:4cce53caa9c747b48f78a18ebdd8def42021-11-20T05:24:34ZDeveloping and validating an instrument to measure: the medical professionalism climate in clinical settings10.18502/jmehm.v14i11.76662008-0387https://doaj.org/article/4cce53caa9c747b48f78a18ebdd8def42021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jmehm.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jmehm/article/view/950https://doaj.org/toc/2008-0387 This study was conducted to develop and validate an instrument to measure the medical professionalism climate in clinical settings. The item pool was developed based on the Tehran University of Medical Sciences Guideline for Professional Conduct. The items were distributed between two questionnaires, one for health-care providers and the other for patients. To assess the construct validity of the questionnaires, 350 health-care providers and 88 patients were enrolled in the study. The reliability of the questionnaires was evaluated by calculating Cronbach’s alpha and ICC. At first a 74-item pool was generated. After assessing and confirming face and content validity, 41 items remained in the final version of the scale. Exploratory factor analysis revealed the three factors of “personal behavior”, “collegiality” and “respect for patient autonomy” in a 25-item questionnaire for service providers and a single factor of “professional behavior” in a 6-item questionnaire for patients. The three factors explained 51.775% of the variance for service providers’ questionnaire and the single factor explained 63.9% of the variance for patients’ questionnaire. The findings demonstrated that from the viewpoints of patients and service providers, this instrument could be applied to assess the medical professionalism climate in hospital clinical settings. Fariba AsghariZahra ShahvariAbbas EbadiFateme AlipourShahram SamadiMaryam BahreiniHomayoun AminiTehran University of Medical SciencesarticleProfessionalism; Clinical setting; Questionnaire; Validation.History of medicine. Medical expeditionsR131-687Medical philosophy. Medical ethicsR723-726ENJournal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Vol 14 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Professionalism; Clinical setting; Questionnaire; Validation. History of medicine. Medical expeditions R131-687 Medical philosophy. Medical ethics R723-726
spellingShingle	Professionalism; Clinical setting; Questionnaire; Validation. History of medicine. Medical expeditions R131-687 Medical philosophy. Medical ethics R723-726 Fariba Asghari Zahra Shahvari Abbas Ebadi Fateme Alipour Shahram Samadi Maryam Bahreini Homayoun Amini Developing and validating an instrument to measure: the medical professionalism climate in clinical settings
description	This study was conducted to develop and validate an instrument to measure the medical professionalism climate in clinical settings. The item pool was developed based on the Tehran University of Medical Sciences Guideline for Professional Conduct. The items were distributed between two questionnaires, one for health-care providers and the other for patients. To assess the construct validity of the questionnaires, 350 health-care providers and 88 patients were enrolled in the study. The reliability of the questionnaires was evaluated by calculating Cronbach’s alpha and ICC. At first a 74-item pool was generated. After assessing and confirming face and content validity, 41 items remained in the final version of the scale. Exploratory factor analysis revealed the three factors of “personal behavior”, “collegiality” and “respect for patient autonomy” in a 25-item questionnaire for service providers and a single factor of “professional behavior” in a 6-item questionnaire for patients. The three factors explained 51.775% of the variance for service providers’ questionnaire and the single factor explained 63.9% of the variance for patients’ questionnaire. The findings demonstrated that from the viewpoints of patients and service providers, this instrument could be applied to assess the medical professionalism climate in hospital clinical settings.
format	article
author	Fariba Asghari Zahra Shahvari Abbas Ebadi Fateme Alipour Shahram Samadi Maryam Bahreini Homayoun Amini
author_facet	Fariba Asghari Zahra Shahvari Abbas Ebadi Fateme Alipour Shahram Samadi Maryam Bahreini Homayoun Amini
author_sort	Fariba Asghari
title	Developing and validating an instrument to measure: the medical professionalism climate in clinical settings
title_short	Developing and validating an instrument to measure: the medical professionalism climate in clinical settings
title_full	Developing and validating an instrument to measure: the medical professionalism climate in clinical settings
title_fullStr	Developing and validating an instrument to measure: the medical professionalism climate in clinical settings
title_full_unstemmed	Developing and validating an instrument to measure: the medical professionalism climate in clinical settings
title_sort	developing and validating an instrument to measure: the medical professionalism climate in clinical settings
publisher	Tehran University of Medical Sciences
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/4cce53caa9c747b48f78a18ebdd8def4
work_keys_str_mv	AT faribaasghari developingandvalidatinganinstrumenttomeasurethemedicalprofessionalismclimateinclinicalsettings AT zahrashahvari developingandvalidatinganinstrumenttomeasurethemedicalprofessionalismclimateinclinicalsettings AT abbasebadi developingandvalidatinganinstrumenttomeasurethemedicalprofessionalismclimateinclinicalsettings AT fatemealipour developingandvalidatinganinstrumenttomeasurethemedicalprofessionalismclimateinclinicalsettings AT shahramsamadi developingandvalidatinganinstrumenttomeasurethemedicalprofessionalismclimateinclinicalsettings AT maryambahreini developingandvalidatinganinstrumenttomeasurethemedicalprofessionalismclimateinclinicalsettings AT homayounamini developingandvalidatinganinstrumenttomeasurethemedicalprofessionalismclimateinclinicalsettings
_version_	1718419480357371904

Developing and validating an instrument to measure: the medical professionalism climate in clinical settings

Ejemplares similares