Stochastic sampling effects favor manual over digital contact tracing
Contact tracing for a timely isolation of potentially infected individuals can be provided manually or via digital applications. Mancastroppa et al. show that in the combination of both procedures the manual tracing is dominant and allows for better detection of infection super-spreaders.
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | Marco Mancastroppa, Claudio Castellano, Alessandro Vezzani, Raffaella Burioni |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/4cef804f41ca461ebb15f42dfba86254 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Modelling digital and manual contact tracing for COVID-19. Are low uptakes and missed contacts deal-breakers?
por: Andrei C Rusu, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Modelling digital and manual contact tracing for COVID-19. Are low uptakes and missed contacts deal-breakers?
por: Andrei C. Rusu, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control
por: G. Cencetti, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
COVID-19 mitigation by digital contact tracing and contact prevention (app-based social exposure warnings)
por: Germán J. Soldano, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
How detection ranges and usage stops impact digital contact tracing effectiveness for COVID-19
por: Konstantin D. Pandl, et al.
Publicado: (2021)