Unmentionables: Some Remarks on Taboo

This paper discusses the phenomenon of linguistic taboo. It contrasts that phenomenon with the truth-conditional and non-truth-conditional dimensions of meaning, paying particular attention to slurs and coarseness. It then highlights the peculiarities of taboo and its meta-semantic repercussions: ta...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Stefano Predelli
Formato: article
Lenguaje:CS
EN
SK
Publicado: Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.28312
https://doaj.org/article/4dba6db2d9cb4c7eaae4c64b1cd974fe
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:4dba6db2d9cb4c7eaae4c64b1cd974fe
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:4dba6db2d9cb4c7eaae4c64b1cd974fe2021-11-30T16:30:50ZUnmentionables: Some Remarks on Taboohttps://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.283121335-06682585-7150https://doaj.org/article/4dba6db2d9cb4c7eaae4c64b1cd974fe2021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/09211822orgf.2021.28312.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/1335-0668https://doaj.org/toc/2585-7150This paper discusses the phenomenon of linguistic taboo. It contrasts that phenomenon with the truth-conditional and non-truth-conditional dimensions of meaning, paying particular attention to slurs and coarseness. It then highlights the peculiarities of taboo and its meta-semantic repercussions: taboo is a meaning-related feature that is nevertheless directly associated with the tokening process. In the conclusion, it gestures to the role of taboo within a theory of linguistic action and the standard framework for conversational exchanges. On these results, I am going to end by looking at some of the harms that epistemic injustice inflicts upon its victims.Stefano PredelliInstitute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciencesarticletaboonon-truth-conditional meaningderogationcoarsenessregisterdavid kaplanPhilosophy (General)B1-5802CSENSKOrganon F, Vol 28, Iss 3, Pp 726-744 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language CS
EN
SK
topic taboo
non-truth-conditional meaning
derogation
coarseness
register
david kaplan
Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
spellingShingle taboo
non-truth-conditional meaning
derogation
coarseness
register
david kaplan
Philosophy (General)
B1-5802
Stefano Predelli
Unmentionables: Some Remarks on Taboo
description This paper discusses the phenomenon of linguistic taboo. It contrasts that phenomenon with the truth-conditional and non-truth-conditional dimensions of meaning, paying particular attention to slurs and coarseness. It then highlights the peculiarities of taboo and its meta-semantic repercussions: taboo is a meaning-related feature that is nevertheless directly associated with the tokening process. In the conclusion, it gestures to the role of taboo within a theory of linguistic action and the standard framework for conversational exchanges. On these results, I am going to end by looking at some of the harms that epistemic injustice inflicts upon its victims.
format article
author Stefano Predelli
author_facet Stefano Predelli
author_sort Stefano Predelli
title Unmentionables: Some Remarks on Taboo
title_short Unmentionables: Some Remarks on Taboo
title_full Unmentionables: Some Remarks on Taboo
title_fullStr Unmentionables: Some Remarks on Taboo
title_full_unstemmed Unmentionables: Some Remarks on Taboo
title_sort unmentionables: some remarks on taboo
publisher Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.28312
https://doaj.org/article/4dba6db2d9cb4c7eaae4c64b1cd974fe
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanopredelli unmentionablessomeremarksontaboo
_version_ 1718406443383652352