Unmentionables: Some Remarks on Taboo
This paper discusses the phenomenon of linguistic taboo. It contrasts that phenomenon with the truth-conditional and non-truth-conditional dimensions of meaning, paying particular attention to slurs and coarseness. It then highlights the peculiarities of taboo and its meta-semantic repercussions: ta...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | CS EN SK |
Publicado: |
Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.28312 https://doaj.org/article/4dba6db2d9cb4c7eaae4c64b1cd974fe |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:4dba6db2d9cb4c7eaae4c64b1cd974fe |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:4dba6db2d9cb4c7eaae4c64b1cd974fe2021-11-30T16:30:50ZUnmentionables: Some Remarks on Taboohttps://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.283121335-06682585-7150https://doaj.org/article/4dba6db2d9cb4c7eaae4c64b1cd974fe2021-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/09211822orgf.2021.28312.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/1335-0668https://doaj.org/toc/2585-7150This paper discusses the phenomenon of linguistic taboo. It contrasts that phenomenon with the truth-conditional and non-truth-conditional dimensions of meaning, paying particular attention to slurs and coarseness. It then highlights the peculiarities of taboo and its meta-semantic repercussions: taboo is a meaning-related feature that is nevertheless directly associated with the tokening process. In the conclusion, it gestures to the role of taboo within a theory of linguistic action and the standard framework for conversational exchanges. On these results, I am going to end by looking at some of the harms that epistemic injustice inflicts upon its victims.Stefano PredelliInstitute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciencesarticletaboonon-truth-conditional meaningderogationcoarsenessregisterdavid kaplanPhilosophy (General)B1-5802CSENSKOrganon F, Vol 28, Iss 3, Pp 726-744 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
CS EN SK |
topic |
taboo non-truth-conditional meaning derogation coarseness register david kaplan Philosophy (General) B1-5802 |
spellingShingle |
taboo non-truth-conditional meaning derogation coarseness register david kaplan Philosophy (General) B1-5802 Stefano Predelli Unmentionables: Some Remarks on Taboo |
description |
This paper discusses the phenomenon of linguistic taboo. It contrasts that phenomenon with the truth-conditional and non-truth-conditional dimensions of meaning, paying particular attention to slurs and coarseness. It then highlights the peculiarities of taboo and its meta-semantic repercussions: taboo is a meaning-related feature that is nevertheless directly associated with the tokening process. In the conclusion, it gestures to the role of taboo within a theory of linguistic action and the standard framework for conversational exchanges. On these results, I am going to end by looking at some of the harms that epistemic injustice inflicts upon its victims. |
format |
article |
author |
Stefano Predelli |
author_facet |
Stefano Predelli |
author_sort |
Stefano Predelli |
title |
Unmentionables: Some Remarks on Taboo |
title_short |
Unmentionables: Some Remarks on Taboo |
title_full |
Unmentionables: Some Remarks on Taboo |
title_fullStr |
Unmentionables: Some Remarks on Taboo |
title_full_unstemmed |
Unmentionables: Some Remarks on Taboo |
title_sort |
unmentionables: some remarks on taboo |
publisher |
Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.31577/orgf.2021.28312 https://doaj.org/article/4dba6db2d9cb4c7eaae4c64b1cd974fe |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stefanopredelli unmentionablessomeremarksontaboo |
_version_ |
1718406443383652352 |